Yea, it's realIs that real or altered?
Yea, it's realIs that real or altered?
I reckon this is a bit simplistic, the 'left' isn't this one mass, many of us ('us' as in those of a similar political persuasion) do not share the same goals as you/the Democrats and we never will. For the same reason, we oppose(d) Clinton not because we deem her 'imperfect' or whatever, but because we're against her full stop. There is an important distinction to be made here. This would be on much the same plane as me opposing Malcolm Turnbull in Australia.
Why did the Democrats punt on the Kansas 4th, which was very winnable tonight? Is it really just because it was a true leftist who beat the establishment Dem in the primary?
.
And that's the WHOLE POINT!! Throwing away an eminently qualified candidate that lines up in almost every way for you, but because of a few stances you don't like, you end up ushering in freaking Donald TRUMP!
Looking forward to the SNL skit that has Melissa McCarthy as Spicer getting kicked off a United flight kicking and screaming and then being handed a Pepsi for her trouble.
Compare the amount of money the GOP invested vs. the amount of money the Democratic Party invested.I understand that this election was making news, and twitter feeds were saying how the GOP are worried, but at the end of the day it's a Republican district. There's been no D win in over 20 years.
This idea that it was "very winnable" is a stretch, but I'm curious as to why you think the Dems "punted"?
So you're saying Spicey is #TeamBannon and not #TeamKush?So, anyone who uses a phrase like "Holocaust Camp" doesn't seem to be blowing a neo-Nazi dog whistle; that person is simply a blithering idiot. However, on FB, Spicer blamed the media and said that he wanted to clarify that Hitler didn't gas his own people. I guess because Jews, LGBT, and gypsys weren't real Germans. Which is kind of a neo-Nazi dog whistle.
Oh, and the WH didn't mention Jews on Holocaust Rememberance Day.
So you're saying Spicey is #TeamBannon and not #TeamKush?
Also, hearing about "Holocaust Centers" for gays in Chechnya.
Chechnya Opens 'Concentration Camps For Gay Men'
Why did the Democrats punt on the Kansas 4th, which was very winnable tonight? Is it really just because it was a true leftist who beat the establishment Dem in the primary?
yeah, why is this not a bigger news story?
Come on, this is a joke.
That district was +27 Trump and the Dems came within 6.8% last night. Hello?? That is HUGE.
It was not in any way a winnable district. It's the district around Wichita, which is one of the most solid red districts around. To come under a 10 point spread in an election where the Dems did not start pouring $ in until about 10 days before the race should be terrifying to the Republicans.
This is how you chip away, and any sort of suggestion that this is punting is totally divorced from the reality of this district.
It goes back to the Howard Dean strategy (how funny is it that a scream killed his campaign given Trump's behaviour?) of competing in all 50 states. No you are not going to win Kansas outright, and you may not for decades, but you have to make inroads by engaging local people, the grassroots party, encouraging people to run in districts knowing full well that they have no shot but maybe they erode the difference by a couple of % points each time. The Republicans would have laughed at Texas being within Democratic reach, but here we are and it's very possible that Texas will go red-purple-blue within the next 10-12 years. Yes, that is largely demographics BUT if the Democrats weren't willing to invest time and money in building up districts that are going to be competitive in 3-4 election cycles, they probably wouldn't be.
I get the sense from some people on the left that they are positively giddy anytime the Democratic party doesn't achieve some goal that they've set. Look, personally I find this party way too far to the right, they are the equivalent of the Canadian conservatives so I am not a voter who would be drawn that way, though may approve of some fiscal policies. But there is also such a thing as reality and the reality is that you don't go left in fucking Wichita 5 months after it goes +27 Trump. WTF honestly.
The irony of ironies will be when #TeamBannon ultimately brings down the whole shebang. The Russian connections are clearly in the #TeamKush camp. If they push Bannon out, does anyone have any doubt that he'll turn on them?Yes.
Any press secretary who comes out and throws a tantrum about the size of the inauguration crowd has to be #TeamBannon.
Only white nationalists are so petulant.
The irony of ironies will be when #TeamBannon ultimately brings down the whole shebang. The Russian connections are clearly in the #TeamKush camp. If they push Bannon out, does anyone have any doubt that he'll turn on them?
I don't think the WH is that tallPush Bannon out ... of a fourth floor window.
The irony of ironies will be when #TeamBannon ultimately brings down the whole shebang. The Russian connections are clearly in the #TeamKush camp. If they push Bannon out, does anyone have any doubt that he'll turn on them?
The dems could have started earlier, and pushed harder. The fact is, there aren't a lot of seats available on 2018 and everyone of them matters.Come on, this is a joke.
That district was +27 Trump and the Dems came within 6.8% last night. Hello?? That is HUGE.
It was not in any way a winnable district. It's the district around Wichita, which is one of the most solid red districts around. To come under a 10 point spread in an election where the Dems did not start pouring $ in until about 10 days before the race should be terrifying to the Republicans.
This is how you chip away, and any sort of suggestion that this is punting is totally divorced from the reality of this district.
Why would anyone on the left be against Clinton "full stop" when her policies lined up with about 90% of what the majority of the left stands for?
Add to that - she had a far, FAR stronger history of actually working to help people and push progressive values in and out of politics than Sanders.
And that's the WHOLE POINT!! Throwing away an eminently qualified candidate that lines up in almost every way for you, but because of a few stances you don't like, you end up ushering in freaking Donald TRUMP!
So anyone who was against Clinton "full stop" needs to explain how Trump or Jill Stein (LMFAO ) would have made a better president.
Also thank you for stating one of the most asinine schools of thought that brewed up this past election cycle. That there suddenly was this self-proclaimed group of "true progressives" and that fancied themselves having a completely different set of beliefs than those of us that are life-long liberals. In reality, our views line up about 90%. It was a ridiculous, immature tantrum of "us against the 'establishment'" bullshit, that most of us grow out of, fed by a social media construct that fed it in heaps to the tormented young, white privileged masses.
Now Vlad happen to catch your recent posts in the Aussie thread...
Just what kind of leftist policies do you espouse? Even The Left has a continuum of views.
I consider myself a liberal-progressive, who also has an interest in Nordic Democratic Socialism. Is NDS too milk- toasty for you?