Torture/Waterboarding: Discussion/Debate Thread

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Irvine511

Blue Crack Supplier
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
34,521
Location
the West Coast
[ *split off from Campaign Debate Discussion thread ~y.* ]





diamond said:

Lives have been saved because of waterboarding.



can you show me when, where, and how?

if you'd like, i can give you mountains of false confessions brought about by waterboarding that resulted in wasted time, money, and manpower.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Irvine511 said:




can you show me when, where, and how?

.

here's one story and that is suffcient for me:

'Waterboarding broke al Qaeda captive in 35 seconds,' says former CIA agent defending torture;

By WILLIAM LOWTHER - More by this author »

Last updated at 10:16am on 12th December 2007



Use of the interrogation technique known as "waterboarding" was approved by the White House and gets results, a former CIA agent admitted yesterday.

The technique - which simulates drowning - was used against Al Qaeda captives with success, John Kiriakou told a U.S. TV network.

The one-time CIA interrogator is the first to speak out about the "torture" methods that have earned President George Bush's administration worldwide condemnation.

Scroll down for more...


Reconstruction: To show how inhumane the practice is, a U.S. volunteer is waterboarded, as described by John Kiriakou
Read more...

Algiers reeling as 67 killed and 13 UN staff missing after devastating twin car bombings
Triple car bombs kill 'up to 60' in southern Iraq

The White House has denied torture is used on terror suspects, but Mr Kiriakou said waterboarding "broke" one stubbornly silent Al Qaeda recruiter after just 35 seconds.

Waterboarding involves wrapping plastic or fabric around a detainee's face then pouring water over the top until it is forced up the nose and down the throat to simulate drowning.

Suspects are told they will die if they do not talk.

And although the technique is supposed to be low-risk, critics say it can result in long-lasting psychological damage, injury to the lungs and even, in extreme cases, death.

Mr Kiriakou told the ABC network that he had fought an "intellectual battle" in his mind over the use of waterboarding, and had concluded that it is justified as it saves lives by preventing terror attacks. "This isn't something done willy-nilly," he added. "This was a policy made at the White House, with concurrence from the National Security Council and Justice Department."

Scroll down for more...


Defending waterboarding: Former CIA agent John Kiriakou on ABC News

Mr Kiriakou told how waterboarding was used on Zayn Abu Zubaida, the first high-ranking Al Qaeda member captured after the September 11 attacks in 2001.

Abu Zubaida was seized in a gun battle in Pakistan in the spring of 2002. For weeks he refused to talk and remained ideologically zealous, defiant and unco-operative. Then he was flown to a secret CIA prison - believed to be in Afghanistan - and strapped to a board with his feet in the air.

Cellophane was wrapped around the Al Qaeda man's face and water was forced up his nose and into his throat to make him think he was drowning.

The suspect lasted only 35 seconds before he broke.

"It was like flipping a switch," said Mr Kiriakou.

"From that day on, he answered every question. The threat information he provided disrupted a number of attacks, maybe dozens of attacks.

"Like a lot of Americans, I'm involved in this internal, intellectual battle with myself weighing the idea that waterboarding may be torture versus the quality of information that we often get.

"I struggle with it.



Tortured: Abu Zubaydah broke down in 'less than 35 seconds'
"At the time, I felt that waterboarding was something that we needed to do."

story.zubaydah.nyt.jpg


Mr Kiriakou said he did not interrogate Abu Zubaida, but learned the details from colleagues.

His account came as the U.S. Congress began questioning CIA director Michael Hayden yesterday about why the agency destroyed at least two videotapes of controversial interrogations.

Many senators believe it was done to hide evidence of illegal torture that could have been used against CIA agents in a war crimes tribunal.

General Hayden, speaking to the closed-doors Congress hearing yesterday was expected to say that CIA lawyers ruled that the interrogations were legal and the tapes were destroyed in 2005 to protect the identities of CIA employees who appear on them.

The torture scandal is likely to become a major issue in next year's presidential election.

Abu Zubaida - who says he was coerced into making false confessions - was eventually moved to the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where he is now held in solitary confinement.

He is likely to be tried next year on terrorism charges and the CIA expects that he will spend the rest of his life in custody.

Mr Kiriakou, a 14-year veteran of the CIA who worked in both the analysis and operations divisions, left in 2004 and works as a consultant for a private Washington-based firm.


--------


so this saved lives, and if you want to give me the argument that these guys would gleefully behead our soilders and piss on there corpses and you feel that pouring water over their faces for 35 seconds is cruel and inhumane you're living in a warped universe my dear sister.
 
Last edited:
You are living in a warped universe sister...

This article proves nothing. If this is all you have than this argument is worthless...

What details does this article expose?
 
martha said:
And yet diamond, you insist you're Christian.
?

Are Christians somehow supposed to be unwilling to torture? Are you questioning the faith of untold numbers of firm believers in the history of Christendom? Drawing a line in the sand between real religion (which the claimant invariably does subscribe to) and corrupted or weakened religion is a frivilous enterprise.

If torture didn't work then there would be no dilemma, at what point does the protection of a terrorist exceed the protection of innocent people, what is the burden of proof, how can there be a practical means of stopping it?

Diamond makes the point that waterboarding has gotten results (from a biased source with an agenda), rather than ad hominem attacks against him perhaps somebody could make a point that there was no oversight and accountability, that the institutional corruption of the intelligence services makes it open to mistake at best, but more likely deliberate abuse. All the evident flaws in giving a gang like the CIA carte blanche to abuse human rights around the globe.

I don't have much sympathy for a tortured terrorist, but from the perspective that bad press costs lives having torture in the blind spots of procedure is going to cost lives. There is no moral absolute against torture and any human being is capable of inflicting pain on others, out of sadism or utility.
 
diamond said:



'Waterboarding broke al Qaeda captive in 35 seconds,' says former CIA agent defending torture;



yes, the best people to ask about this are those people who are practicing it and trying to defend their actions.

seems like conservatives would be really interested in this ocean front property i've got in southern Kansas ...

and if you think waterboarding is just pouring water on someone's face, think again. it's correct name is "Simulated Drowning," and it's been used for centuries, most especially by Stalin, the Viet Cong, and Pol Pot.
 
I don't think the faith is really what's being questioned.

I think understanding and intelligence is being questioned.
 
Exactly. I think they believe in Jesus Christ, they just don't get what his point was.
 
but if Jesus and God are the same

the Old Testament is full of things that are on par with or worse than torture

in the name of the right side? (what ever that means)
 
Irvine511 said:




yes, the best people to ask about this are those people who are practicing it and trying to defend their actions.

seems like conservatives would be really interested in this ocean front property i've got in southern Kansas ...

and if you think waterboarding is just pouring water on someone's face, think again. it's correct name is "Simulated Drowning," and it's been used for centuries, most especially by Stalin, the Viet Cong, and Pol Pot.

and if the 1/2 minute of simulated drowning of a terrorist who would prefer to slash innocent people's throats, or blow up innocent people-I don't consider that the proper defintion of torture.

I understand torture to inflict physical harm on a person for sadistic reasons.

We are and have save lives thru different interogation techinques.

People who stand in the way of interrogation techniques that have saved innocent lives are actually a terrorist enablers.

Good job you!

Furthur, in a broader sense one could argue that liberalism is a mental disorder.

People of your mindset are as gullible as Neville Chamberlin waving the treaty in his hand.

dbs
 
martha said:
I'm talking about Christians


I think we have touch on this before

You have explained your definition of Christian .

and I accept that in terms of our conversation.




We might agree on the term patriot.

and Ralph Nader and Tom Delay would each describe themselves as the true patriot.
 
diamond said:


and if the 1/2 minute of simulated drowning of a terrorist who would prefer to slash innocent people's throats, or blow up innocent people-I don't consider that the proper defintion of torture.

I understand torture to inflict physical harm on a person for sadistic reasons.

We are and have save lives thru different interogation techinques.

People who stand in the way of interrogation techniques that have saved innocent lives are actually a terrorist enablers.

Good job you!

Furthur, in a broader sense one could argue that liberalism is a mental disorder.

People of your mindset are as gullible as Neville Chamberlin waving the treaty in his hand.

dbs

That's absolutely right.

And the idea that if we don't torture them they won't torture us is outrageous.

Hey terrorists, here's an idea. How about you tell what you know right away, and then you won't have to be "tortured." I don't have sympathy for a "tortured" terrorist at all. Waterboarding is used as a last resort, so terrorists have every opportunity to avoid it. They choose not to though, because they know it will cause an outrage here in America, and therefore put the focus on waterboarding rather than the actual important issue of potential attacks.
 
Last edited:
diamond said:
People who stand in the way of interrogation techniques that have saved innocent lives are actually a terrorist enablers.

That's one of the single stupidest statements I've ever seen on this board.
 
diamond said:

People who stand in the way of interrogation techniques that have saved innocent lives are actually a terrorist enablers.

So the majority of Americans are terrorists according to your definiton.
 
2861U2 said:


And the idea that if we don't torture them they won't torture us is outrageous.


Who said this? Wow, you like to put words in people's mouth a lot.

It's a matter of lowering yourself to their standards, becoming a monster to stop a monster.

Let me ask you a serious question, how do you justify your Christian beliefs and your support of torture?
 
diamond said:


We are and have save lives thru different interogation techinques.


No one has proven this. That article didn't provide any real information.
diamond said:

People who stand in the way of interrogation techniques that have saved innocent lives are actually a terrorist enablers.

Just plain dumb.

diamond said:

Furthur, in a broader sense one could argue that liberalism is a mental disorder.


Diamond with your debating skills you couldn't argue yourself out of a paper bag, let alone come close to arguing this.

Lay off the hypocritical soapboxing for awhile, will ya?
 
diamond said:
Furthur, in a broader sense one could argue that liberalism is a mental disorder.

In a not-so-broad sense, one could argue that conservatism is intentional ignorance.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


Who said this? Wow, you like to put words in people's mouth a lot.

I'm not saying I've heard it in here, but I've heard from Democrats.


BonoVoxSupastar said:

Let me ask you a serious question, how do you justify your Christian beliefs and your support of torture?

Because there are people in the world that are pure evil, and I certainly hope no one disputes that fact. I support waterboarding (or whatever is necessary) to protect America and my family and loved ones. God is just, and the Bible mentions many times that wars will happen. The Bible also mentions "destroying the wicked people" in times of war.

Look, I obviously would never condone waterboarding my friend who owes me 5 bucks, but a terrorist who would stop at nothing to kill me and you and destroy my country, I'm alright with. I believe God would prefer that to perversion of religion and terrorist attacks killing thousands of innocent lives. How many more Jews would have been killed if nothing was done to stop Hitler?

Again, there's a way to avoid waterboarding by just cooperating in the first place...

Do some people in here feel sorry for waterboarded terrorists? :scratch:
 
Last edited:
How do you know that the guy you have your hands on is (a) a terrorist and (b) in possession of knowledge that is relevant and helpful to you? Maybe he doesn't "talk" at first because he has nothing to say and you got the wrong guy.

You know, sort of like those poor bastards that make it out of jail after 20 years when DNA evidence clears them.
 
TissSlay.jpg






Let me ask you a serious question, how do you justify your Christian beliefs and your support of torture?

Every Christian I know believes in the Bible.

And it is full of a lot worse than this water torture, which I do not support.

One may ask, how does one fall into the "bad thinking" trap?

Accepting certain stories "on faith" as being proper and even righteous does not negate the horror inflicted upon others.

What is worse? Clubbing a thousand people to death?
Sounds like a horrible death, to be beaten to death. Times one thousand.

"And Samson said, With the jawbone of an ass, heaps upon heaps, with the jaw of an ass have I slain a thousand men."

or water boarding?
 
Clearly you don't understand two things if you are for waterboarding:

1) The law of your country.

2) How a terror cell works.
 
anitram said:
How do you know that the guy you have your hands on is (a) a terrorist and (b) in possession of knowledge that is relevant and helpful to you? Maybe he doesn't "talk" at first because he has nothing to say and you got the wrong guy.

You know, sort of like those poor bastards that make it out of jail after 20 years when DNA evidence clears them.

Well of course they would have to make sure it's a correct guy, but I haven't seen any stories of completely innocent people being waterboarded.
 
phillyfan26 said:
Clearly you don't understand two things if you are for waterboarding:

1) The law of your country.

2) How a terror cell works.


How does a terror cell work?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom