The Nativity Story movie

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
80sU2isBest said:


When I brought up the part about Christ rising from the dead in a physical body, you said that many things in the Bible are analogies. Why did you bring up analogies at that specific time, if you did not think that the part about him being in a physical body was an analogy?

No, I was talking about the "Ascension", and that it's actually going up to a place in the sky.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


What does this mean? Where does it say this?

Colossians tell us that Christ has a body. remember that Colossians was of course written after the ascension.

"For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form." -Colossians 2:9. That verse is in present tense, not the past.

So in what form is that body?

"...who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body."-Philippians 3:21.

And Romans is one of the places in which we discover that we will one day have glorified bodies:

"Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies."-Romans 8:23
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


No, I was talking about the "Ascension", and that it's actually going up to a place in the sky.

Okey dokey, so why would you assume that the ascension was analogy?

Where did Christ go if he didn't go back up to the Father?
 
martha said:
So anyway, this movie looks interesting.

Hopefully it won't be filled with gratuitous violence and I can actually consider going to see it.

I'll bet it won't. The opnly thing I can think of that would be violent would be the killing of the babies, and if they were to show that in detail, I'd get up and walk out.
 
deep said:
80s,

I am fairly familiar with a lot of scripture

I just don't take it at face value

I certainly didn't mean to imply that you weren't. You asked me what "ascension" meant, so I naturally assumed you didn't know about the ascension event.

deep said:
yet, we have not found Heaven and the hosts of Heaven with all this space exploration.

And if God is all-powerful and doesn't want it found, I would think we never will.
 
martha said:


They would have to stretch a bit to make it too violent. I don't imagine that it's going to be all puppies and butterflies either, though.

If it's that, I wouldn't want to watch it, either.

It looks very dramatic to me. Looks like it was filmed well.
 
80sU2isBest said:


Okey dokey, so why would you assume that the ascension was analogy?

Where did Christ go if he didn't go back up to the Father?

I don't believe Jesus flew through the stars like an astronaut and touched upon some place in a galaxy far far away. Do Christians in Austrailia have a different Bible?

Do you also believe hell is in the core of the earth?
 
80sU2isBest said:


Colossians tell us that Christ has a body. remember that Colossians was of course written after the ascension.

"For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form." -Colossians 2:9. That verse is in present tense, not the past.




"9For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, 10and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority. 11In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature,[a] not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, 12having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead."

If you want context you should quote the whole passage. Analogy, analogy, analogy... Were you really buried with him? Will Jesus really circumsize you?

Analogy.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:




"9For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, 10and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority. 11In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature,[a] not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, 12having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead."

If you want context you should quote the whole passage. Analogy, analogy, analogy... Were you really buried with him? Will Jesus really circumsize you?

Analogy.

BVS - the Gnostics had a view similar to this. That the Jesus story was an anology of our lives.

Here are a few paragraphs that summarize what many Christians today believe about this:

In Acts 1:9, we are told: "After Jesus said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight." I would like to address a simple question: why? Why was Jesus taken up in this way? But before we get to that, let's read the next three verses:

They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. "Men of Galilee," they said, "why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven." Then they returned to Jerusalem from the hill called the Mount of Olives, a Sabbath day's walk from the city. (vs. 10-12)

This passage makes two basic points— that Jesus ascended into heaven, and that he will return. Both of those items are important in the Christian faith, and both are included in the Apostles' Creed, for example. First, Jesus ascended into heaven. This is commonly known as the Ascension, which is celebrated each year 40 days after Easter, always on a Thursday.

The second point this passage makes is that Jesus will return— he will return in the same way that he ascended. I believe that this latter point is the reason that Jesus ascended in a visible way— to emphasize that he will return in a visible way.

It would have been easy for Jesus to simply tell his disciples that he was going to his Father, and that that he would come back — and then he would simply disappear, as he did on other occasions, just this time never to be see again. I don't know of any theological reason why Jesus would have to ascend in a visible way. He did this to make a point, to teach a particular lesson, to the disciples — and through them, to us.

By visibly going up into the air, Jesus made it clear that he wasn't just disappearing— he was going to heaven, and there, he would be at the Father's right hand to intercede for us as our eternal High Priest. As one writer put it, Jesus is "our Man in heaven." We have somebody in heaven who understands who we are, understands our weaknesses, understands our needs, because he is a human. Even in heaven, he is still a human as well as being God.

Even after the Ascension, Scripture calls him a man. When Paul was preaching to the Athenians at the Areopagus, he said that God would judge the world by a man he has appointed, and that man is Jesus Christ. And when he wrote to Timothy, he called him the man Christ Jesus. He is still a human, and he still has a body. His body rose from the dead, and his body ascended into heaven.
Which leads to the question of just where is that body right now? How can a God who is omnipresent, not limited to space and matter, also have a body that is localized in a particular place? Is the body of Jesus floating somewhere in outer space? I don't know. I don't know how Jesus appeared behind locked doors, either, and I don't know how he could ascend into the air, contrary to the law of gravity. Apparently the laws of physics don't apply to the body of Jesus Christ. It's still a body, but it doesn't have limitations that we think are part of having a body.
That still doesn't answer the question of where the body is right now, but that's really not the most important thing we need to worry about, is it? We need to know that Jesus is in heaven, but we do not need to know just where that is. It is more important for us to know about the spiritual body, the way in which Jesus is living on earth right now in the church. And he is doing that by means of the Holy Spirit.

When Jesus ascended bodily into heaven, he was giving a visible sign that he continues to be human as well as divine. That gives us assurance that he is a high priest who can sympathize with our weaknesses, as it says in Hebrews. So the visible rising into heaven makes this point: that Jesus didn't just go away — he continues his ministry in a different way, as our high priest, our intercessor, our mediator. - Michael Morrison
 
AEON said:


BVS - the Gnostics had a view similar to this. That the Jesus story was an anology of our lives.

Where did I say this?

AEON said:


Here are a few paragraphs that summarize what many Christians today believe about this:

In Acts 1:9, we are told: "After Jesus said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight." I would like to address a simple question: why? Why was Jesus taken up in this way? But before we get to that, let's read the next three verses:

Let's keep these passages in context. 9 verses later here's how they refer to Judas:

18
He bought a parcel of land with the wages of his iniquity, and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle, and all his insides spilled out. 7
19
This became known to everyone who lived in Jerusalem, so that the parcel of land was called in their language 'Akeldama,' that is, Field of Blood.

So did he burst open or hang himself? :hmm:
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


18
He bought a parcel of land with the wages of his iniquity, and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle, and all his insides spilled out. 7
19
This became known to everyone who lived in Jerusalem, so that the parcel of land was called in their language 'Akeldama,' that is, Field of Blood.

So did he burst open or hang himself? :hmm:


Why would a person burst open from a fall? I would think that maybe a person would burst open from a fall if he had fallen from a high tree branch from which he had hung himself.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:




"9For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, 10and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority. 11In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature,[a] not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, 12having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead."

If you want context you should quote the whole passage. Analogy, analogy, analogy... Were you really buried with him? Will Jesus really circumsize you?

Analogy.

Actually, my old man (the sinful nature/my sinful spirit) was actually destroyed and spiritually speaking, I am a new creation. That part is not analogy, but reality. Was I physically buried or circumsized? No. So that part is an analogy.

We could say "That's an analogy" all day long , about verses left and right, but until we develop a standard on how to decide what is analogy, then it's useless chaos. That standard is the two Cs: Context and Common Sense.

In the above passage, common sense makes it obvious that I wasn'y physically circumsized or physically buried with Christ, so that part of the verse must be an analogy.

But think about the words "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form". Does this mean anything other than what it says? Does common sense allow for this to be just an analogy? What could that analogy be? Does any analogy that you could think of make more common sense than the simple face value meaning of "Christ is God in a body"

Now think about context. This is not the only verse in the Bibble in which Christ is spoken of as having a body.
 
80sU2isBest said:



Why would a person burst open from a fall? I would think that maybe a person would burst open from a fall if he had fallen from a high tree branch from which he had hung himself.

How do you fall head first if your hanging?
 
Last edited:
80sU2isBest said:


That standard is the two Cs: Context and Common Sense.


You're right, and common sense and context tells me Jesus didn't fly through the galaxy like Superman and hell isn't in the core of the Earth.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


How do you fall head first if your hanging?

If he hit his head on a rock that would burst his head open, and it wouldn't have to be head first.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


You're right, and common sense and context tells me Jesus didn't fly through the galaxy like Superman and hell isn't in the core of the Earth.

The Bible doesn't say that Jesus flew through the air like Superman; it says he ascended into the clouds. But even if it did say he flew through the galaxy, why would you think that God in the flesh couldn't fly through the galaxy? Do you believe in a God who is bound by the laws of physics, or in a God who is outside them?
 
80sU2isBest said:


The Bible doesn't say that Jesus flew through the air like Superman; it says he ascended into the clouds. But even if it did say he flew through the galaxy, why would you think that God in the flesh couldn't fly through the galaxy? Do you believe in a God who is bound by the laws of physics, or in a God who is outside them?

My point is not a God that is bound by the laws of physics or not. It's just that your line of logic means he had to ascend into the clouds and keep going until he found this physical place of heaven. And that hell would have to be in the center of the earth.

This is your logic not mine.
 
80sU2isBest said:


I don't understand this; are you from Australia?

No I'm just pointing out that heaven would be in a different direction for Australians, it would be up and then take a left, given this very literalist logic.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


How do you fall head first if your hanging?

Given that tradition holds that Judas was trying to get Jesus to usher in the Kingdom, and did a poor job of that, it's not surprising that he would do a poor job of hanging himself too.
 
Last edited:
BonoVoxSupastar said:


My point is not a God that is bound by the laws of physics or not. It's just that your line of logic means he had to ascend into the clouds and keep going until he found this physical place of heaven. And that hell would have to be in the center of the earth.

This is your logic not mine.

Christian philosophers hold that Heaven is not literally held in the heavens; however, given the relative inability of the disciples to understand interdimensionality, Jesus most likely ascended to conform to where conventional wisdom said Heaven was at the time.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


My point is not a God that is bound by the laws of physics or not. It's just that your line of logic means he had to ascend into the clouds and keep going until he found this physical place of heaven. And that hell would have to be in the center of the earth.

This is your logic not mine.

We know that Heaven is a place. We know that because of all the things that the Bible tells us happened there, like the great war in Heaven, which resulted in Satan being "cast down" from heaven, and other things.

Knowing that it's a place in which God lives, we are left with what I told Deep earlier, that if the omnipotent God didn't want you to find Heaven, you wouldn't.

Also, since God is not bound by the laws of physics, wouldn't it be entirely possible (more likely probable) that he would create a dwelling place that would exist beyond human wisdom and the laws of physics?
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


It said he fell headlong, by definition is head first. I mean we're taking it literally right?

Ah, but what about the other meanings? It can also mean "In an impetuous manner; rashly" and "uncontrollably forceful or fast", amongst other definitions.

I think I've addressed everything you asked me. You may not agree with my answers, but I have answered them. Now, please address the following, which I asked you several posts ago:


But think about the words "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form". Does this mean anything other than what it says? Does common sense allow for this to be just an analogy? What could that analogy be? Does any analogy that you could think of make more common sense than the simple face value meaning of "Christ is God in a body"?
 
nathan1977 said:


Christian philosophers hold that Heaven is not literally held in the heavens; however, given the relative inability of the disciples to understand interdimensionality, Jesus most likely ascended to conform to where conventional wisdom said Heaven was at the time.

And here's what I'm getting at. I'm sure there may have been some sign of grand exit, one of which the folks could somehow grasp. Thanks for making the point of conventional wisdom, it's something I've pointed out many times in here to literalist.

But the point that, because he ascended means he still has to have his body makes no sense to me.
 
80sU2isBest said:


We know that Heaven is a place. We know that because of all the things that the Bible tells us happened there, like the great war in Heaven, which resulted in Satan being "cast down" from heaven, and other things.

Knowing that it's a place in which God lives, we are left with what I told Deep earlier, that if the omnipotent God didn't want you to find Heaven, you wouldn't.

Also, since God is not bound by the laws of physics, wouldn't it be entirely possible (more likely probable) that he would create a dwelling place that would exist beyond human wisdom and the laws of physics?

Well you're getting a little closer to what I've been trying to point out to you, but I still don't think there's any concrete reasoning to believe it's a physical place.
 
80sU2isBest said:


I think I've addressed everything you asked me. You may not agree with my answers, but I have answered them. Now, please address the following, which I asked you several posts ago:


Actually, no you keep avoiding the hell question.

80sU2isBest said:

But think about the words "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form". Does this mean anything other than what it says? Does common sense allow for this to be just an analogy? What could that analogy be? Does any analogy that you could think of make more common sense than the simple face value meaning of "Christ is God in a body"?

I honestly have no problem with this. In fact I believe I stated that this wasn't the issue I had. Yes Christ had a body, but it doesn't mean he has to have one now.
 
Back
Top Bottom