The most trusted NEWS source in America? - Page 41 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-02-2012, 08:23 PM   #801
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 06:13 PM
*tries to figure out the next FOX conspiracy*

Anything is possible, really.
__________________

Pearl is offline  
Old 11-02-2012, 08:31 PM   #802
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,324
Local Time: 06:13 PM
Hannity and Rove on the Obama Sandy backlash just now. That it will be big this weekend. Talking about FEMA not distributing enough generators when Romney doesn't even believe that much in FEMA ( of course those two NEVER bring that up). Google the 08 debate clips. Well that depends on when you ask him, of course. They even brought up the marathon stuff, I guess because Bloomberg endorsed Obama. Hannity is always saying Obama is jetting off to Vegas. Every time I check out that show he's saying that. That's a lot of flights to Vegas.

Rove doesn't know how to pronounce Quinnipiac.
__________________

MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 05:36 AM   #803
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Popmartijn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 32,849
Local Time: 12:13 AM
Hold the press!
Someone at Fox endorses Obama. Why I am voting for Barack Obama | Fox News

Popmartijn is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 09:19 AM   #804
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 06:13 PM
She lives in NYC so she's not a real Amurkan anyway.
anitram is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 11:32 AM   #805
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 64,498
Local Time: 03:13 PM
They're only real Americans when someone needs to reference 9/11 for political purposes.
corianderstem is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 02:44 PM   #806
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 02:13 PM
Is Kohn a real Armeican name?

as for working at Fox*



* Kohn is an unpaid contributor for the Fox News Channel

Kohn met her partner, Sarah Hansen, at the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, in 2003. Hansen works as an activist and consultant, and is the former Executive Director of the Environmental Grantmakers Association. They have a 3 year old daughter, Willa Eliza Hansen-Kohn.
deep is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 09:41 PM   #807
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,266
Local Time: 06:13 PM
Funny, to me, that Fox News seems to get all the slam and the
mud here.

Do you really think that NBC, ABC, and CBS have been unbiased in
their reporting the last four years?


Note: None of them have mentioned anything about the controversy
about the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya
the iron horse is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 09:48 PM   #808
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 06:13 PM
No, I just don't think people fervently defend Fox the way conservatives tend to.
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 09:55 PM   #809
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 06:13 PM
I also don't think that the left spends that much time watching network tv news.

I certainly never do and I don't pay for MSNBC either. Shocking, I know.
anitram is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 09:55 PM   #810
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,266
Local Time: 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilsFan View Post
No, I just don't think people fervently defend Fox the way conservatives tend to.

Is that an answer to my question or a comment?
the iron horse is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 10:02 PM   #811
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse

Is that an answer to my question or a comment?
An answer. People don't defend those networks you listed the way people defend Fox. Which is why Fox is in the conversation so much more.

People like INDY dismiss Fox's tactics as "pissing off the right people." He has said that before on here.
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 11:28 PM   #812
Blue Crack Supplier
 
dazzledbylight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the sound dancing - w Bono & Edge :D
Posts: 34,878
Local Time: 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl View Post
*tries to figure out the next FOX conspiracy*

Anything is possible, really.
you could start a thread on this!

dazzledbylight is offline  
Old 11-03-2012, 11:38 PM   #813
Blue Crack Supplier
 
dazzledbylight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the sound dancing - w Bono & Edge :D
Posts: 34,878
Local Time: 06:13 PM
100% real New Yawk Citian 'Merakuhn
dazzledbylight is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 01:27 PM   #814
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 20,771
Local Time: 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
Funny, to me, that Fox News seems to get all the slam and the
mud here.

Do you really think that NBC, ABC, and CBS have been unbiased in
their reporting the last four years?


Note: None of them have mentioned anything about the controversy
about the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya
Has anyone here ever denied they were biased? Not to mention, I seem to recall many of us here talking quite often about how the news media in general, regardless of what side they support, sucks nowadays.

And I've also said before that I don't really care if Fox News has a conservative bent, if they want to promote that point of view, it's their network, they can do what they want. I just wish they'd own up to the fact that they are right-leaning, instead of constantly insisting on going with the "fair and balanced" BS.
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 09:32 PM   #815
Paper Gods
Forum Administrator
 
KhanadaRhodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a vampire in the limousine
Posts: 60,688
Local Time: 05:13 PM
it's next to impossible, if not totally impossible to not impart some bias when reporting things. we all do it. you tell a friend a story that happened to you where someone accidentally bumped into you and spilled some of her coffee on you and suddenly the woman's a bitch or did it on purpose or something. you add a slant to it.

the difference between all the news channels is how much of a bias is there and if they admit there's a bias. fox is the worst because of not just how much of a bias there is in their reporting but also how much they continue to deny they have any bias at all. msnbc is usually what's thrown in the lefties' faces as being "our" version of fox but msnbc doesn't have a slogan like "fair and balanced", nor do they claim to report news without a slant. that's the difference. no matter whether it's tv, print, or online, own up to and admit the bias and it doesn't matter how much of one there is. i don't care if you're going to call obama a kenyan, if you're going to admit you report with a drastically right slant to the point where it's barely considered news, then fine.

that's the difference. well that and also doing a better job at alerting viewers what shows are strictly news (and keeping it to the facts) and which are purely opinion pieces and actually calling them such. most lefties wouldn't say they get their news from jon stewart or rachel maddow, yet some righties think sean hannity and bill o'reilly are news.
__________________
KhanadaRhodes is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 10:26 PM   #816
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 06:13 PM
When I was an undergraduate, my journalism professor would start off every class with the question of being objective as a reporter, and whether that was every really possible.

I agree that it is tough, especially when it comes to certain issues where it is clear something is right or wrong. I mean, how could anyone be objective while covering Staten Island in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy? Then again, I'm biased myself

But as for FOX News, their problem is not only insisting that they're "fair and balanced" when they are not. They make outrageous claims that are getting worse and worse. Remember in 2008 when one of the anchors called Barack and Michelle's fist bump during a campaign a "terrorist fist jab"? And recently they called the hurricane relief show politically motivated. Seriously, who is writing that crap?

When I worked in news, I knew people who knew those who worked at FOX and they were told not everyone at FOX is conservative, but they pretend to be for the sake of survival (those are the technicians, production assistants, writers, but never the higher echelons). I can't imagine the hell in working for a station that is getting more paranoid and radical by the day, and you can see it but the powers that be can't.
Pearl is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 11:15 PM   #817
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 06:13 PM
MSNBC is the only network that remotely leans left, and that's only because it's trying to vie for a market of people who hate Fox News (most of those people, unfortunately for Comcast's executives, use the Internet for news).

All other networks simply follow the format that best serves the interests of the corporations they are operated by. Fox has decided to go for a very conservative demographic, while the others are generally right-leaning economically and left-leaning socially, because those are the trends in the corporate world.
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 11:46 PM   #818
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 20,771
Local Time: 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl View Post
But as for FOX News, their problem is not only insisting that they're "fair and balanced" when they are not. They make outrageous claims that are getting worse and worse. Remember in 2008 when one of the anchors called Barack and Michelle's fist bump during a campaign a "terrorist fist jab"? And recently they called the hurricane relief show politically motivated. Seriously, who is writing that crap?
This, too. It's one thing to bring up a conservative argument for a president's policy and why you would agree or disagree with what they're doing. That's fine, nothing wrong with that. There are certainly worthwhile criticisms to be made about the way Obama does things, things that I would gladly listen to and discuss and possibly even agree with.

But I would seriously hope any conservative worth their salt would be embarrased that Fox News is supposed to represent their point of view when they have people on there calling Obama a terrorist or terrorist sympathizer or someone who, as Glenn Beck put it once, has a "deep-seeded hatred of white people", or flailing their arms and being all, "He's a socialist communist who's going to turn this country into a tyranny!" all over the place.

That is not legitimate, reasonable critique of a president and their policies. That is all outright, blatant lying and paranoid, nonsensical rhetoric. And if you have an opinion/editorial show and you want to spout that craziness, even, that's one thing (though I still think it's bad even then), but if you're supposed to be claiming yourselves as a legit news organization, that kind of "reporting" shouldn't be happening at all.
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 11-05-2012, 07:58 AM   #819
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,324
Local Time: 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse

Do you really think that NBC, ABC, and CBS have been unbiased in
their reporting the last four years?

Note: None of them have mentioned anything about the controversy
about the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya
No they're not unbiased. But that's just not a true statement, about Libya. I sample all three networks and they have all done stories. So Fox or anyone else saying that isn't true.

I never watch MSNBC because they're as big of a joke as Fox. Both are comical farce.
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 11-05-2012, 08:35 AM   #820
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 05:13 PM
Fox and all the other right wing media is selling this story that NO ONE out there is telling the story about Libya except them, and their audience is buying hook, line, and sinker. But what they really mean is that no one is selling THEIR version of the story and if it's not THEIR version then it's biased. They are desperate and trying a last minute "throw some shit on the wall and see if it sticks" tactic. The truth is is that all three of those stations have covered the "controversy", but they are covering it in the same vein as Condoleezza Rice, we are not privy to all the information and saying otherwise is just Monday morning quarterbacking.
__________________

BVS is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×