The Gay Thread - Page 44 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-27-2015, 11:00 AM   #861
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
It's a stunt, and California has a weird process by which anyone can introduce a bill.

It will be tossed out very quickly.
It's not a bill, it's an initiative. That means he needs to meet a threshold of signatures of registered voters, and if that requirement is met, the initiative becomes a ballot proposition and we vote on it in the next election. Any citizen can start an initiative and gather signatures to get it on the ballot.
__________________

martha is offline  
Old 03-27-2015, 11:50 AM   #862
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,461
Local Time: 09:44 AM
Martha knows.
__________________

Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-27-2015, 12:00 PM   #863
Blue Crack Addict
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,443
Local Time: 09:44 AM
That exists in other states.
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 03-27-2015, 01:43 PM   #864
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Hewson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your own private Idaho
Posts: 32,031
Local Time: 08:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
I have a deeply held religious objection to drunken bachelorette parties going to gay bars and treating them like petting zoos.
Is this an actual thing?
Hewson is offline  
Old 03-27-2015, 02:59 PM   #865
Blue Crack Addict
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,443
Local Time: 09:44 AM
Minus the religious objection, yes.
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 03-27-2015, 04:53 PM   #866
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 05:44 AM
Boycott Indiana

tapatalk, it works
deep is offline  
Old 03-27-2015, 05:15 PM   #867
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,461
Local Time: 09:44 AM
The Gay Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hewson View Post
Is this an actual thing?



Yes. There's this one club in DC that has risers banned heels "because safety." But they were really just trying to make it more difficult for the ladies to infiltrate and drunkenly ogle the shirtless dancing boys.

That said, I think ANYONE should be allowed and welcomed and encouraged to be in a gay bar, and the need for gay bars is declining now that we can go pretty much anywhere. New gay bars are big and open with rooftops and big windows whereas in the past they were in dark, secluded alleyways. Straights go. It's great. BUT there are some ladies who get drunk and act like dudes.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-27-2015, 05:20 PM   #868
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 05:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
there are some ladies who get drunk and act like dudes.

nothing worse,
like when some guys run like a girl.
deep is offline  
Old 03-27-2015, 07:44 PM   #869
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
Martha knows.
Yeah. It's how we set some of our educational policy.
martha is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:25 AM   #870
More 5G Than Man
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 68,491
Local Time: 05:44 AM
So someone explain this Indiana bill to me. It basically works on the honor system, right? Is there anything stopping a, let's say, homophobic atheist from using Christianity as a front? I mean, there's no way this entire law can be based off of someone's word alone. But that's how it reads to me right now.

It also sounds like a legal nightmare, if that is the case.
LemonMelon is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:41 AM   #871
Refugee
 
nbelcik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,592
Local Time: 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LemonMelon View Post
So someone explain this Indiana bill to me. It basically works on the honor system, right? Is there anything stopping a, let's say, homophobic atheist from using Christianity as a front? I mean, there's no way this entire law can be based off of someone's word alone. But that's how it reads to me right now.

It also sounds like a legal nightmare, if that is the case.

It is based on someone's word, so there isn't anything to stop a homophobic atheist from using Christianity as a front. Anyone can say they have a deeply held religious belief that justifies their personal prejudices.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
nbelcik is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 03:05 AM   #872
More 5G Than Man
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 68,491
Local Time: 05:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbelcik View Post
It is based on someone's word, so there isn't anything to stop a homophobic atheist from using Christianity as a front. Anyone can say they have a deeply held religious belief that justifies their personal prejudices.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Well, shit.

And I'm sure victims of discrimination, in 2015, will be happy to stand there and take it when there's so physical proof that a business owner even has such a faith. What a fucking trainwreck.
LemonMelon is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 09:34 AM   #873
The Fly
 
KoDVooDo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 52
Local Time: 09:44 AM
There are many things in this world I don't understand, but let's focus on those which pertain to this bullshit law. Excepting regulatory or legal requirements, shouldn't a business open to the public be required to be open to the entire public? I understand a person can have "deeply held" religious beliefs, but a business is separate from it's owner, isn't it? This would be a separate issue from Hobby Lobby not paying for health insurance because that's actually the owner spending his/her own money. Also separate from Chik-Fil-A, since they are closed to the entire public on Sundays not just those whom the owners consider immoral. Some may even argue that following their beliefs trumps the laws if man. Haven't been to church in years, but I seem to remember something about "render unto Caesar what is Ceasar's". The churches I went to generally accepted this to mean to live by the laws of the land even if the actions taken seemed at odds with religious teaching.

Just another reason I no longer have faith in religious establishments.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using U2 Interference mobile app
KoDVooDo is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 09:49 AM   #874
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,778
Local Time: 03:44 PM
I still find it striking that these intolerant homophobes still have such a strong voice. Here if someone utters something homophobic, it gets a small piece in the paper, everyone's duly outraged and then a day later nobody gives a damn anymore. They simply don't have a platform to shout their messages anymore.

Hopefully the US is gonna reach that point some day. There's a long way to go, but it's starting to go in the right direction.

It would be nice if everywhere around the world people would realise that religion and sexuality are private personal things, but yeah, I know that's pretty damn impossible to hope for.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 11:13 AM   #875
Blue Crack Distributor
 
bono_212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 83,644
Local Time: 05:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoDVooDo View Post
Some may even argue that following their beliefs trumps the laws if man. Haven't been to church in years, but I seem to remember something about "render unto Caesar what is Ceasar's". The churches I went to generally accepted this to mean to live by the laws of the land even if the actions taken seemed at odds with religious teaching.
Basically.
__________________
bono_212 is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 12:38 PM   #876
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,461
Local Time: 09:44 AM
The Gay Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by nbelcik View Post
It is based on someone's word, so there isn't anything to stop a homophobic atheist from using Christianity as a front. Anyone can say they have a deeply held religious belief that justifies their personal prejudices.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference



But only against the gays. If I say i have a deeply rooted religious belief against baking macaroons for a Bar Mitzvah or seating blacks at my restaurant, I can't refuse to do so. Because that would be discrimination, the bad kind.

So long as it's "deeply held" and "religious" it's automatically about the gays. These are our new code words. Right?
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 12:42 PM   #877
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 64,498
Local Time: 06:44 AM
Well, we all know if there had been any gays at the wedding at Canaa, Jesus would have been all "GTFO" and not let them have any of his magic fishes or wine.
corianderstem is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 12:43 PM   #878
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,461
Local Time: 09:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
I still find it striking that these intolerant homophobes still have such a strong voice. Here if someone utters something homophobic, it gets a small piece in the paper, everyone's duly outraged and then a day later nobody gives a damn anymore. They simply don't have a platform to shout their messages anymore.

Hopefully the US is gonna reach that point some day. There's a long way to go, but it's starting to go in the right direction.

It would be nice if everywhere around the world people would realise that religion and sexuality are private personal things, but yeah, I know that's pretty damn impossible to hope for.


There's a major rural/urban divide in the US. And it's a huge place. There's a reason why this passed in a place like Indiana.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 01:06 PM   #879
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,778
Local Time: 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
But only against the gays. If I say i have a deeply rooted religious belief against baking macaroons for a Bar Mitzvah or seating blacks at my restaurant, I can't refuse to do so. Because that would be discrimination, the bad kind.

So long as it's "deeply held" and "religious" it's automatically about the gays. These are our new code words. Right?
Yeah, cause gays apparently aren't equal to 'normal' people. While we have now learned that jews and blacks are.



Man in 50 years this will all sound as ridiculous as it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
There's a major rural/urban divide in the US. And it's a huge place. There's a reason why this passed in a place like Indiana.
Fraid I don't have much knowledge on the different states, asides from the usual cliches. I take it Indiana is a bit backwards?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:10 PM   #880
Blue Crack Distributor
 
bono_212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 83,644
Local Time: 05:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
But only against the gays. If I say i have a deeply rooted religious belief against baking macaroons for a Bar Mitzvah or seating blacks at my restaurant, I can't refuse to do so. Because that would be discrimination, the bad kind.

So long as it's "deeply held" and "religious" it's automatically about the gays. These are our new code words. Right?
Which is why a law like this bothers me so much. Who's to stop anyone from doing the above?

Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
Well, we all know if there had been any gays at the wedding at Canaa, Jesus would have been all "GTFO" and not let them have any of his magic fishes or wine.
Again, exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
There's a major rural/urban divide in the US. And it's a huge place. There's a reason why this passed in a place like Indiana.
Actually, Indiana is a lot more complex a state than people give it credit for, which is why this is a very difficult situation for many people who live there, and why my Facebook feed is more blown up with people against this law passing than for it. The entire northwestern portion of the state is completely different from the rest. Blue area, industrial-based, central time zone, etc. The loudest rep against this is from my home city. He's been in the Indiana government for most of my life and I worked a page for him for a day back in 8th grade. You've probably seen a lot of quotes from him in the last few days, he's the House Minority Leader.

There are so many other problems in Indiana right now that this is taking attention from, it's pathetic. The mills are about to have more lay-offs, there's an HIV scare down south, the education system is beyond broken (no thanks to Pence, or his predecessor), but the fact is, if it's not happening in Indianapolis, or the surrounding area, the rest of the state couldn't give two fucks.

I could write a novel the length of A Song of Ice and Fire about how effed up things are in Indiana, and have been for quite some time.
__________________

__________________
bono_212 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×