That Racist Bastard GW Bush

diamond · 11-25-2002, 07:52 PM

... is..is..granting Amnesty to 3 Million illegal Mexican immigrants.

I just dont know what to think

Is he truly a compassionate conserative?

Will other arch conseratives like Pat Buchannan get their panties in a wad?

Will GW tell the other closed minded conservatives to blow it out their asses?

Your spin- my liberal pundits?

DB9

Zoomerang96 · 11-25-2002, 07:56 PM

can you site a source or link? id be interested in reading a news release.

cloudimani · 11-26-2002, 03:48 PM

this place is very rapidly becoming the home of Bush/Republican propaganda.

ouizy · 11-26-2002, 05:27 PM

Even I, liberal of liberals fully disagrees with this decision.

Borders should have been sealed on Sept 12 2001.

Immigration laws should have been rethunk Sept 13 2001.

That Canada / Mexico bridge should be built.

Danospano · 11-26-2002, 07:08 PM

That's interesting, Diamond. It doesn't sound like Bush is serious about closing off the borders to possible terrorist. Maybe he's trying to sway Latino votes away from the Democrats....aay?

bonoman · 11-26-2002, 07:31 PM

If he would have kicked 3 million out you would have been aplauding him. you's would have said he's being tough on illegal immigrants. I could care less. Its always, it seems, jump on the president wagon around here.

Scarletwine · 11-26-2002, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cloudimani
this place is very rapidly becoming the home of Bush/Republican propaganda.

No joke!

First you can't call him a N____ even I think he's close. Then you can't call him H_____ (but he's closer to the Chancellor). Maybe I can call him a moron?

He's actually less.

diamond · 11-26-2002, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bonoman
If he would have kicked 3 million out you would have been aplauding him.

bull shit.
it would make me sad.
u dont know me.

DB9

U2Bama · 11-26-2002, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scarletwine

First you can't call him a N____ even I think he's close. Then you can't call him H_____ (but he's closer to the Chancellor).

Hey, Scarletwine! How are you doing this evening?

I saw your post above and I wanted to ask you about a couple of the things you hit upon. I studied World History and U.S. History a lot in college, and I have always been interested in the subject in general, incuding the era of the National Socialist movement in Germany and their leader. I am alos an avid follower of U.S. politics (since I live here) and try to keep up with everything on a daily basis.

I was curious if you would be willing to elaborate on the ways that you think that U.S. President George W. Bush is close to the National Socialist Part and its Chancellor. I promise I am not trying to be ugly or anything. I don't think you are joking about it (at least I hope you aren's) and knowing the seriousness of the abuses committed by the National Socialist regime in the 1930s and 1940s, if these same actions are being carried out by the current U.S. administration, I would like to know about it for my own well-being.

So if you could, what are some examples of these similarities? I do know that there are some racist hate groups in the U.S. (generally anti-government militia-type groups) and in some governments areound the world, but this is the first I have heard about it being an active voice in the U.S. government. My ears are open to what you have to say.

Thanks and have a great evening! I look forward to hearing from you.

~U2Alabama

V Nura · 11-26-2002, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scarletwine

No joke!

First you can't call him a N____ even I think he's close. Then you can't call him H_____ (but he's closer to the Chancellor). Maybe I can call him a moron?

He's actually less.

I dont' like bush that much...but those comparisons are pretty ridiculous.

I will say this

the only reason he's doing this is because INS is soo overwhelemed by illegal immigrants from mexico that they seem to think it's a good idea to hand visas out to terrorists and even renew them after they are dead.

This is more about security than it is about compassion.

diamond · 11-26-2002, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arun V

I dont' like bush that much...but those comparisons are pretty ridiculous.

I will say this

This is more about security than it is about compassion.

i disagree

Merry Christmas

DB9

V Nura · 11-26-2002, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by diamond

i disagree
Merry Christmas

DB9

merry xmas?...whatever happened to pluralism

Bush is trying to protect america. there is nothing wrong with it...just don't make him into a christ figure because of it.

simply put if he could expel all the illegals from mexico..he would why??? because it's the law! and as president it's his job to uphold it. But in this day and age priorities have changed and bush is actually for once smart enough to realize that people working hard to get by in this country who aren't legal arent' a threat. People who want to kill innocent ppl are.

diamond · 11-26-2002, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arun V

Bush is trying to protect america. there is nothing wrong with it...

But in this day and age priorities have changed and bush is actually for once smart enough to realize that people working hard to get by in this country who aren't legal arent' a threat. People who want to kill innocent ppl are.

thats better.
happy thanksgiving

DB9

us3 · 11-26-2002, 10:15 PM

That racist bastard�? I thought he was just an "illegitimate" pres...So then who's his daddy?? I think I know.

diamond · 11-26-2002, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by us3
That racist bastard�? I thought he was just an "illegitimate" pres...So then who's his daddy?? I think I know.

us3-
the title of this thread was meant to be cynical.
do not confuse the clones here,u stiff little monkey

thank u
DB9

diamond · 11-26-2002, 11:24 PM

for us3

i see no humor

diamond

diamond · 11-26-2002, 11:29 PM

still not funny

thank u
DB9

Zoomerang96 · 11-27-2002, 12:43 AM

the bottom line is, the government no longer speaks for us, the people.

ive been seeing polls lately, from various sources that i cannot name at the moment, that suggest the american public only supports war against iraq IF they go in alone by about 25%.

deep · 11-27-2002, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scarletwine

No joke!
Then you can't call him H_____ (but he's closer to the Chancellor).

Comparisons to Adolph are not valid,
Remember the mustached one was actually elected.

STING2 · 11-27-2002, 08:44 AM

Actually its about 35%. Thing is, the USA will not be alone no matter what happens. The United Kingdom will always be with us along with Kuwait, Romania and Bulgaria.

11-25-2002, 07:52 PM	#1
diamond ONE love, blood, life Join Date: May 2002 Location: Tempe, Az USA Posts: 12,856 Local Time: 01:33 PM	That Racist Bastard GW Bush ... is..is..granting Amnesty to 3 Million illegal Mexican immigrants. I just dont know what to think Is he truly a compassionate conserative? Will other arch conseratives like Pat Buchannan get their panties in a wad? Will GW tell the other closed minded conservatives to blow it out their asses? Your spin- my liberal pundits? DB9 __________________

11-25-2002, 07:56 PM	#2
Zoomerang96 ONE love, blood, life Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: canada Posts: 13,462 Local Time: 03:33 PM	can you site a source or link? id be interested in reading a news release. __________________

11-27-2002, 08:44 AM	#20
STING2 Rock n' Roll Doggie FOB Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 8,876 Local Time: 08:33 PM	Actually its about 35%. Thing is, the USA will not be alone no matter what happens. The United Kingdom will always be with us along with Kuwait, Romania and Bulgaria. __________________

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-26-2002, 03:48 PM	#3
cloudimani Acrobat Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Ireland Posts: 483 Local Time: 08:33 PM	this place is very rapidly becoming the home of Bush/Republican propaganda.

11-26-2002, 05:27 PM	#4
ouizy Rock n' Roll Doggie Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: s p o r a t i c Posts: 3,790 Local Time: 04:33 PM	Even I, liberal of liberals fully disagrees with this decision. Borders should have been sealed on Sept 12 2001. Immigration laws should have been rethunk Sept 13 2001. That Canada / Mexico bridge should be built.

11-26-2002, 07:08 PM	#5
Danospano Refugee Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 1,415 Local Time: 03:33 PM	That's interesting, Diamond. It doesn't sound like Bush is serious about closing off the borders to possible terrorist. Maybe he's trying to sway Latino votes away from the Democrats....aay?

11-26-2002, 07:31 PM	#6
bonoman Refugee Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Edmonton, Canada- Charlestown, Ireland Posts: 1,398 Local Time: 01:33 PM	If he would have kicked 3 million out you would have been aplauding him. you's would have said he's being tough on illegal immigrants. I could care less. Its always, it seems, jump on the president wagon around here.

11-26-2002, 10:15 PM	#14
us3 The Fly Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 165 Local Time: 12:33 PM	That racist bastard�? I thought he was just an "illegitimate" pres...So then who's his daddy?? I think I know.

11-26-2002, 11:24 PM	#16
diamond ONE love, blood, life Join Date: May 2002 Location: Tempe, Az USA Posts: 12,856 Local Time: 01:33 PM	for us3 i see no humor diamond

11-26-2002, 11:29 PM	#17
diamond ONE love, blood, life Join Date: May 2002 Location: Tempe, Az USA Posts: 12,856 Local Time: 01:33 PM	still not funny thank u DB9

11-27-2002, 12:43 AM	#18
Zoomerang96 ONE love, blood, life Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: canada Posts: 13,462 Local Time: 03:33 PM	the bottom line is, the government no longer speaks for us, the people. ive been seeing polls lately, from various sources that i cannot name at the moment, that suggest the american public only supports war against iraq IF they go in alone by about 25%.