Terrorists Could Be Your Next Door Neighbor... - Page 3 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-16-2005, 03:18 PM   #41
The Fly
 
Sonoftelepunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 90
Local Time: 09:02 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by financeguy



You shouldn't take posts so personally. What I would say is, if you are prepared to engage in robust debate, it is a give and take process.
Yes, and I had been given plenty and I was taking just then.
__________________

Sonoftelepunk is offline  
Old 08-16-2005, 04:28 PM   #42
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 07:02 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon
Well, I apologize. My point was to be a bit crass, but only because we spend so much time dehumanizing Muslims to make them sound like animals. After all, "sensitivity" is so "librul."

That was my point, which can be made by a word that even I think to be crass.

So I hope you can understand why I used it.

Melon
I understand.

(That word grates on me like no other.)
__________________

martha is offline  
Old 08-16-2005, 08:11 PM   #43
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Zoomerang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: canada
Posts: 13,462
Local Time: 09:02 AM
a_wanderer's comments always make coming to this forum worthwhile. hysterical!
Zoomerang96 is offline  
Old 08-16-2005, 08:50 PM   #44
ONE
love, blood, life
 
zoney!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: six metro locations
Posts: 11,378
Local Time: 08:02 AM
No child is left behind when it comes to TSA!

No baby would get through a TSA line with a "explosive jacket" - that is actually one of the things they are trained for (parents using children as decoys). It is sad...but that is how the terrorists think (and our very own sonoftelepunk).

Sonoftelepunk - you have now been added to the No-Fly-List.

actually, the list is updated just about daily. names are removed and added.
zoney! is offline  
Old 08-16-2005, 09:05 PM   #45
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 12:02 AM
Interesting that the idea of using the restricted resources as effectively as possible is considered hysterical. I suppose that the other options are do nothing or do everything ~ if every single person was submitted for full checks before boarding planes then there would be no cause for alarm; no profiling at all could take place.

Bombs can be detected with effective security technology, when you are trying to defend against hijackings they are probably going to be men aged 15 - 50, religion is a factor but it is not an effective means for profiling because anybody intent on doing such damage maintains a lower profile of adherence. Just look at the manner in which the 9/11 hijackers indulged in life before the attacks, it can minimise suspicion.

There should be a degree of profiling, which I said should probably age and sex; the September 11 hijackers, Trade Center Bombers, London Bombers, Richard Reid the Shoe Bomber etc. were all Muslim males aged 15 - 50, but if you exclusively profile on religion it is too tight and there are weaknesses. Sex and age are two broad factors that cut the potential pool by more than 50%.
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 08-17-2005, 09:42 AM   #46
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 07:02 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by verte76
I can't believe this. Babies? Yeah, they're a real threat.
Ever change a diaper?


Sometimes they do contain bombs - dirty ones - hazmat city
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:09 AM   #47
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 06:02 AM
don't ever change em
when they are standing on the kitchen table

unless you want to learn the true meaning of "whiz kid".
deep is offline  
Old 08-17-2005, 12:31 PM   #48
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 07:02 AM
I've got it! No men at all allowed on airplanes!

Think of it: bathrooms would be cleaner and smell better, fewer drunk men getting nasty with the flight crew, the female flight attendants wouldn't get harrassed, and since all the pilots prosecuted for drunk flying have been men so far, the pilot would be sober! And, no bombers!! Since they're all men so far, and profiling "works" keeping the guys off the plane is a win-win for everyone.

Well, almost. But hey, if it keeps one bomber from blowing up a plane, it's all worth it, and I'm more than willing to make the sacrifice.
__________________

martha is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×