nbcrusader
Blue Crack Addict
My guess is "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy"
Ah yes, I remember now.nbcrusader said:My guess is "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy"
melon said:
Hmm...so did you get an error dialog box when this failed? I'd be interested in what it is, if you can remember.
As for the QTs...I tend to export lots of uncompressed video, and then put it into a ZIP or RAR archive for transport. A 30 GB video file can often be archived into a 5 GB or less file, interestingly enough. Of course, unless you have a high-end workstation, you won't be able to play it; but I just use such files to export and import between the various programs I use...
...but even then, when you're dealing with deadlines and a less-than-ideal wireless router, that process can be a bit time consuming.
Good luck. Hope it all works out.
nbcrusader said:
If Robertson had made this statement, this place would have gone nuclear.
But, I guess we tiptoe around the elephant in the room in certain cases
financeguy said:
Can anyone say conservative paranoia?
As I write this the slam Hilary Clinton thread is close to the top of the page whereas hardly anyone has commented on a speech Al Gore made the other day (widely regarded as an excellent speech althogh I haven't heard it.)
Irvine511 said:
that's a wonderfully telling statement on how different people's worldviews can be.
financeguy did a nice job pointing this out.
i suppose we all need to feel under seige.
nbcrusader said:
Care to clarify?
Irvine511 said:the problem is the time crunch. posting to an FTP would get the composer the TimeCoded cut of the film immedately, whereas even FedExing something priority to the UK takes 2 business days. under the deadline, and with the price that compression would have cost us at the post house, it simply wasn't worth it to do it any other way.
had we the time, a DVD would have been a great idea.
Irvine511 said:re-read financeguy's post.
i could easily say, "if HRC had said it, this place would have gone nuclear."
i could also talk about the "religious bias" of FYM.
but such things are unmentionable in such a left-wing forum.
nbcrusader said:Dismiss a double standard as "paranoia" or try to mask it with the ambiguous "race matters" label - but if bigoted language becomes not-bigoted based on the color of the speaker, you have an act of bigotry in itself.
Irvine511 said:not sure i agree with you on this one.
we can expound on the myriad differences between n-i-g-g-e-r and n-i-g-g-a, for example.
i think the achievement of a single standard of bigotry, trying to nail down bigotry as having a fixed definition that is applicable in all situations, is inherently flawed.
after all, it will be the definition of bigotry as decided upon by the dominant culture.
nbcrusader said:It doesn't matter what the speaker was thinking, but what the hearer was feeling (or what others presume a hearer did or should feel).
I had a brief stint as a bookstore manager while I was in grad school, and I still have the mantra "Perceptions are everything, intentions are nothing" beaten into my head from the company's harassment policies.nbcrusader said:It doesn't matter what the speaker was thinking, but what the hearer was feeling (or what others presume a hearer did or should feel).