Study: Men in Their 50s More Sexually Satisfied Than Younger Men

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

yolland

Forum Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
7,471
Do I really want to post this? OK, I'm gonna post it.
Men in their 50s more satisfied with their sex lives

by Tom Spears
Vancouver Sun
February 21, 2006


Men in their 50s have happier sex lives than guys in their 30s and 40s, despite the indignities of bodies that sputter like an old car, a joint Norwegian and American study suggests. Fifty-five-year-olds, in fact, can still get satisfaction nearly on a par with kids 30 years younger.

The study of nearly 1,200 men in Norway acknowledges that men in their 50s are starting to lose their physical oomph. Published in a urology journal called BJU International, it carries graphic detail of erections, or the lack of them, and everything else involved in the male reproductive tract. But the study also looks beyond the purely physical and asks: Are you happy with your sex life?

And it found that the 50s are a prime time to be a man in that respect -- almost tied on the ratings scale with men in their 20s. (Sadly, after age 59, the satisfaction level drops right off.)

The men in the survey were aged 20 to 79. They were asked to rate many aspects of their sex lives on a scale of zero to four, where four represents "good sexual function and no problems." Men in their 20s reported an average satisfaction level of close to 2.79. But the fifty-somethings were practically tied with them, at over 2.77. Men in their 30s were the least happy, at 2.55, and men in their 40s averaged 2.72. After the age of 59, overall satisfaction fell significantly to 2.46 for men in their 60s, and to 2.14 for men in their 70s.

While a man's sex drive and his body decline in a predictable way with age, "there wasn't such a strong link between age and overall sexual satisfaction," the team says in a written summary of their work. The study is by researchers at the University of Oslo, University of Bergen and Harvard Medical School.

It all makes perfect sense to Guy Grenier, a psychologist and sex therapist who teaches at the University of Western Ontario. "People who aren't young and perfect tend to be de-sexualized in our society. So the very fact that you're asking that question (why older men feel satisfied) is a reflection of this.
Look at our media images. Who's sexy? Who's got the hot bod? It isn't a 40-year-old, isn't a 50-year-old." Yet, he says sex therapists agree that growing older fits perfectly with sexual happiness. "These results are consistent with what we find in women as well," he noted. "In older age groups, people are less hung up about performance. People have learned more about themselves. They are more comfortable in their relationship. They have found ways to express their sexual needs. They're less focused on performance, so sex becomes a moment to be intimate and to bond with somebody."

Ronald Bracey, a psychologist with a special interest in male sexuality, told the BBC News website he too was not surprised by the results. "Men in their thirties and forties are often too stressed by things such as being successful in their career to enjoy sex. But by the time men get into their fifties they have usually adjusted to what they want out of life, and tend to be less hung up, less concerned by what other people think of them, and less prone to performance anxiety."
Nothing shocking here really, but it is interesting to note that men and women in their 30s and 40s experience more of a decline in sexual satisfaction than 50-somethings do. I doubt career and family stress alone is sufficient to explain this--I think the preoccupation of many people this age with lamenting the loss of being young, highly libidinous and conventionally desirable (i.e., young and "fresh" like the stars on the cover of Rolling Stone's "Hot" issue or whatever) feeds into it also. Probably this effect is even more pronounced in women--perhaps they will do a follow-up on that.

It's sad that things decline so much after 59, but I would like to think most people that age are more able to take comfort in pleasure and intimacy from other sources without beating themselves up emotionally for having to do so. You never outgrow your need for love and connectedness, but there are a thousand and one ways to pursue that once you're sufficiently at peace with the reality of progressively increasing limitations to center your emotional life on other pleasures.
 
It would be interesting to see the percentage of men (and women) who were married (or other long term relationships).

The media portrays the lust aspect of sex. Sex in marriage is more driven by the love (agape) aspect of sex. I would suggest that the relationship adds a far deeper aspect to sex (and thus more satisfying) than the base physical components found in lust driven sex.
 
nbcrusader said:
I would suggest that the relationship adds a far deeper aspect to sex (and thus more satisfying) than the base physical components found in lust driven sex.

I would think that is probably true, I want to believe it's true for men.

I also wonder how many of these men in the study are in relationships with people their own age. I would like to believe most and that they don't need some young chick in order to feel that way :wink:

Of course it is Norway, I wonder if the same is true in the US

I like the name of the urology journal :shifty: :D
 
I was wondering about the relationship factor, too--I also am inclined to suspect that people in committed relationships probably fared somewhat better on these scores, if only (and to be cynical about it) because they have the confidence-booster of At Least Someone Still Wants Me. On the other hand, people in committed relationships are hardly immune to the fear of becoming less desirable, and that can bring down the quality of the sexual relationship even if commitment to the relationship overall remains. While knowing someone is there for you (and you for them) is a powerfully affirming thing, agape isn't always going to trump flagging sexual self-esteem. For better or for worse, our awareness of ourselves as sexual beings isn't limited to our actual sexual relationships, and that can have implications for said relationships no matter how strong the love is.

Maybe I just know too many self-loathing 30- and 40-something divorcees and that's making me cynical...on the other hand, some of my married friends that age wonder aloud occasionally where their sex lives have gone to, too, and more often than not they seem to be implicitly blaming the (mutual) loss of their formerly everready libidos for the problem. To me, that ought to have little bearing on their sexual satisfaction really, but at the same time, I can see how their preoccupation with "We're just not what we used to be"--which I suspect comes mostly from sources outside the marriage (or hangups they possess as individuals, rather than jointly) could really dampen their sexual enthusiasm for each other.
 
yolland said:

Nothing shocking here really, but it is interesting to note that men and women in their 30s and 40s experience more of a decline in sexual satisfaction than 50-somethings do. I doubt career and family stress alone is sufficient to explain this--I think the preoccupation of many people this age with lamenting the loss of being young, highly libidinous and conventionally desirable (i.e., young and "fresh" like the stars on the cover of Rolling Stone's "Hot" issue or whatever) feeds into it also. Probably this effect is even more pronounced in women--perhaps they will do a follow-up on that.


Many people I know in that age group (30's - 40's) are so exhausted by their careers, children, home, and family, that sex does not come very high on their list of priorities. Further (and I'm speaking mainly for females here, I've not had this conversation with many men ;) ) I find it hard to buy that aging into the 30's and 40s would have a negative impact on sexuality. Most women that I know of in that age group would tell you that they've become very comfortable with themselves, cognitively, emotionally, and physically, to a much larger degree than they were in their teens or 20's, but that's just a personal observation.

It would be interesting to look at other correlations - married or single, length of relationship, age of children, careers/ses. I think that may provide more clues as to what the causes might be.

As for men in their 50's, social psychology/stages of life research has shown that men of this age group tend to mellow, become less aggressive and concerned with careers, and become more loving, nurturing, and relationship-oriented. The converse is true for women, however. After years of nurturing and being placed in the role of the caregiver, they tend to become more assertive and self-oriented. Perhaps this tendency for men and women to essentially swap traits to a certain degree during this stage of their lives lends itself to a more satisfying sexual experience.


It's sad that things decline so much after 59, but I would like to think most people that age are more able to take comfort in pleasure and intimacy from other sources without beating themselves up emotionally for having to do so. You never outgrow your need for love and connectedness, but there are a thousand and one ways to pursue that once you're sufficiently at peace with the reality of progressively increasing limitations to center your emotional life on other pleasures.

If you look at the numbers, the differences between men in their 30's and men in their 60's are negligable - probably not even statistically significant. My guess is that though physical difficulties may surface in the 60's, by the time males reach their 70's, they become pronounced and common enough to then impact sexuality in a much more negative way.
 
here's hoping it just gets better and better and better ...


(though being in my 20's, it appears as if i have two decades of disappointment head ...)
 
MrsSpringsteen said:


I would think that is probably true, I want to believe it's true for men.

I also wonder how many of these men in the study are in relationships with people their own age. I would like to believe most and that they don't need some young chick in order to feel that way :wink:

The older man going after the younger women highlights the "conquest" component some men are after. Satisfaction may not come from a relationship, or even the sexual act itself, but only with the "victory" of bedding another person. I've got to imagine that after a while, that gets old.
 
I think sexual satisfaction in your 50s (or any age really) probably comes from having let go of unrealistic expectations and the related pressure. If you are no longer hung up on how often, how long, how to impress, how you look, how to keep up to previous levels etc etc, you are just free to enjoy mutual pleasure.
 
Last edited:
VintagePunk said:
Many people I know in that age group (30's - 40's) are so exhausted by their careers, children, home, and family, that sex does not come very high on their list of priorities. Further (and I'm speaking mainly for females here, I've not had this conversation with many men ;) ) I find it hard to buy that aging into the 30's and 40s would have a negative impact on sexuality. Most women that I know of in that age group would tell you that they've become very comfortable with themselves, cognitively, emotionally, and physically, to a much larger degree than they were in their teens or 20's, but that's just a personal observation.
Well we've got three young kids and careers, and if I may say so we still keep sexual satisfaction pretty high on our priority list. ;) Having kids in particular does tend to drive down the frequency, there's no two ways about that, but frequency and satisfaction are not the same thing.

As far as what women friends say, I guess mine must be a more jaded lot than yours, because while it's true that they generally report feeling increasingly less preoccupied with their looks and "flirtability" and seem to welcome that, nonetheless this "freedom" often seems to me more than a little tinged with an attitude of weary resignation, rather than more positive feelings of newfound self-worth. Same with male friends really, though the effect is less pronounced and they're generally more hopeful about their continued desirability.
As for men in their 50's, social psychology/stages of life research has shown that men of this age group tend to mellow, become less aggressive and concerned with careers, and become more loving, nurturing, and relationship-oriented. The converse is true for women, however. After years of nurturing and being placed in the role of the caregiver, they tend to become more assertive and self-oriented. Perhaps this tendency for men and women to essentially swap traits to a certain degree during this stage of their lives lends itself to a more satisfying sexual experience.
This is a good point. I wonder, though, if there isn't an underlying similarity here in that both transitions involve coming to terms with the reality that you're never going to live up to all the gender role expectations you once aspired to, and are in fact only stunting yourself by doing so. Like AliEnvy said basically.

Are you in the mental health field, VintagePunk? You seem to be quite conversant with that literature.
Irvine511 said:
two decades of disappointment head
:giggle: Nice Freudian slip there chum.
 
AliEnvy said:
I think sexual satisfaction in your 50s (or any age really) probably comes from having let go of unrealistic expectations and the related pressure. If you are no longer hung up on how often, how long, how to impress, how you look, how to keep up to previous levels etc etc, you are just free to enjoy mutual pleasure.

That is an interesting point. I wonder what factors contribute to unrealistic expectations?
 
well dang it all.....

My poor wife....

If these are our off years...30's....

and I put her in the hospital withe vertigo....

What will the next couple of decades bring :combust:
 
My wife just told me....stop bragging....even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.:mad:
 
Well the hard part is explaining to the Dr. why she developed vertigo at 300 AM.....

Hehe:wink:
 
nbcrusader said:

The older man going after the younger women highlights the "conquest" component some men are after. Satisfaction may not come from a relationship, or even the sexual act itself, but only with the "victory" of bedding another person. I've got to imagine that after a while, that gets old.

It doesn't seem to get old for many

Of course women being involved with younger men seems to be more acceptable now, I'd venture an opinion that it's less of a conquest/ego thing for women-not in all cases of course.
 
yolland said:

Having kids in particular does tend to drive down the frequency, there's no two ways about that, but frequency and satisfaction are not the same thing.


I think that to some people, frequency does contribute to sexual satisfaction, as well as overall relationship satisfaction. If two partners have vastly different frequency needs, then at least one is apt to not be as satisfied overall, no matter how good the quality. Sounds like you and your partner have struck a good balance between quantity and quality. ;)

As far as what women friends say, I guess mine must be a more jaded lot than yours, because while it's true that they generally report feeling increasingly less preoccupied with their looks and "flirtability" and seem to welcome that, nonetheless this "freedom" often seems to me more than a little tinged with an attitude of weary resignation, rather than more positive feelings of newfound self-worth. Same with male friends really, though the effect is less pronounced and they're generally more hopeful about their continued desirability.

Weary resignation as far as aging goes? As far as their ability to attract male attention?

Again, I think this is probably a difference in the people we know and associate with. Many of the women I had in mind when writing my previous post have come out of long-term relationships, are very independant and confident, with extremely full lives, and are not really seeking another serious relationship. Not to imply that the women you know aren't these things, however.

This is a good point. I wonder, though, if there isn't an underlying similarity here in that both transitions involve coming to terms with the reality that you're never going to live up to all the gender role expectations you once aspired to, and are in fact only stunting yourself by doing so. Like AliEnvy said basically.

It's fascinating to posit what the underlying mechanisms of such phenomena might be. In the case of women, I would suggest something much more simple as one factor, and that would be caregiver burn-out. I'm aware that women have more lifestyle choices today than ever, but the fact remains that most conscientious mothers do tend to sacrifice a great deal for their children, giving up some of their own desires and opportunities. The late 40s-50's is typically a time when empty-nest syndrome begins for many of these women, and so they have to opportunity for the first time in many years to be relatively self-indulgent, placing their own needs ahead of others for a change. For men, a rather simplistic explanation could be that their changes come in reaction to their wives' attitudes. Maybe a fear that since the nest is empty, she no longer has anything tying her to said nest, so he becomes more involved in nurturing and maintaining the relationship again. Sweeping generalizations, I know, but I'm just tossing out possibilities.

Speaking of gender roles, interestingly, studies have shown that those who are not caught up in rigid masculine or feminine roles - those where both partners tend to have more androgynous traits - have the happiest and most successful relationships.

Are you in the mental health field, VintagePunk? You seem to be quite conversant with that literature.

I'm one of those crazy mature students who willingly returned to school. I'm in the clinical division, but social psych is my second love. I'll be seeking employment again very soon. Any contacts would be appreciated. ;)
 
I really am skeptical when reading these articles on these kinds of studies. People are all different, especially the sexes. Factor in health, climate, financial security, lifestyle, and possibly geography and the percentages and data will likely completely change. Still, interesting read. My mother used to tell me when I was newly married (early 20's) that sex would be magnificent in my 30's and she was right...then improved at 40+. Who knows what 50's will be like? We will all have to wait and see when we get there, won't we?!!! :wink:
 
I can only speak for my husband. He is fifty five and I am fourty nine. We have been married for almost twenty three years. And both of us have a very satisfing sex life. There is of course love, intimacy and faithfulness. And also, the friendship. He is my best friend. We are more "in love" then we were. When our marriage was new. Neither one of us could imagine spending our lives with out each other.
 
Maeve said:
I can only speak for my husband. He is fifty five and I am fourty nine. We have been married for almost twenty three years. And both of us have a very satisfing sex life. There is of course love, intimacy and faithfulness. And also, the friendship. He is my best friend. We are more "in love" then we were. When our marriage was new. Neither one of us could imagine spending our lives with out each other.

:up: :up: :up: :up: :up:
 
Carek1230 said:
I really am skeptical when reading these articles on these kinds of studies. People are all different, especially the sexes. Factor in health, climate, financial security, lifestyle, and possibly geography and the percentages and data will likely completely change. Still, interesting read. My mother used to tell me when I was newly married (early 20's) that sex would be magnificent in my 30's and she was right...then improved at 40+. Who knows what 50's will be like? We will all have to wait and see when we get there, won't we?!!! :wink:

Hi Carek,

I am going to assume from your post that you are female. I am also a woman. And at 49, I am perimenupausal. Because of significant hormonal changes that are normal for a woman my age. The "lust factor" can also be less intense. But, for me. What replaces this is real intimacy with my husband. Making love is much better for both of us.

Another factor is that our home is almost paid for. Our children are grown, educated and have good jobs. The "fifties" is a time for us. We have more freedom and less financial worries. We can at the drop of a hat. Travel, go out to dinner and movie. And we don't have to worry about a babysitter.

I will be fifty this year. And though, I look different than I did at twenty. Two pregnancies, menopause, will put a couple of pounds on you. Acutually, I only weigh twenty pounds more. Then, I did in my twenties. I am now a size ten instead of a six. But, I am going to embrase "fifty." It is a wonderful time in my life.

Take care,

Maeve
 
Maeve said:
I can only speak for my husband. He is fifty five and I am fourty nine. We have been married for almost twenty three years. And both of us have a very satisfing sex life. There is of course love, intimacy and faithfulness. And also, the friendship. He is my best friend. We are more "in love" then we were. When our marriage was new. Neither one of us could imagine spending our lives with out each other.

That's awesome
 
Maeve said:


Another factor is that our home is almost paid for. Our children are grown, educated and have good jobs. The "fifties" is a time for us. We have more freedom and less financial worries. We can at the drop of a hat. Travel, go out to dinner and movie. And we don't have to worry about a babysitter.


I am envious. I love my children more than life itself, as any parent does....

But I do miss that freedom we shared in the first five years of our marriage.

We paid $13,000 in childcare/education two years ago. It is a strain on us.

I am not complaining, we have a good life, but if we get away one weekend a year without the kids, it is huge.
 
Back
Top Bottom