speedracer
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2001
- Messages
- 7,604
http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/08/07/australia.lightspeed/index.html
I'm not an experimental physicist, so I'm not familiar with the experiment these astrophysicists did.
I wouldn't say that this proves that Einstein's special or general theories of relativity are wrong, though. What really governs the speed of light are epsilon_0 and mu_0, epsilon_0 being the constant that determines how strong electrostatic attraction/repulsion is in empty space (how strong of a force there is between two charges), and mu_0 being the constant that determines the coupling between electrodynamics and magnetism in empty space (how strong of a magnetic force is generated by an electric current). So it could be just that empty space was different in the early universe, however that might have happened.
Of course, the inconstancy of the speed of light may pose a quandary for theoretical physicists, who define the speed of light to be 1.
Anywho, thought some folks here might find this interesting/amusing.
I'm not an experimental physicist, so I'm not familiar with the experiment these astrophysicists did.
I wouldn't say that this proves that Einstein's special or general theories of relativity are wrong, though. What really governs the speed of light are epsilon_0 and mu_0, epsilon_0 being the constant that determines how strong electrostatic attraction/repulsion is in empty space (how strong of a force there is between two charges), and mu_0 being the constant that determines the coupling between electrodynamics and magnetism in empty space (how strong of a magnetic force is generated by an electric current). So it could be just that empty space was different in the early universe, however that might have happened.
Of course, the inconstancy of the speed of light may pose a quandary for theoretical physicists, who define the speed of light to be 1.
Anywho, thought some folks here might find this interesting/amusing.
Last edited: