diamond said:would we be ok w Pee Wee Herman adopting children...?
Would you mind elaborating on this question?
Melon
diamond said:would we be ok w Pee Wee Herman adopting children...?
diamond said:would we be ok w Pee Wee Herman adopting children...?
diamond said:How about Robert Maplethorpe?
Should this fella be permitted?
melon said:
Should Anna Nicole Smith be permitted to adopt a child? Since we all know she represents heterosexuality like Robert Mapplethorpe represents homosexuality...
Melon
Dreadsox said:
Do you think before you type????????????
diamond said:would we be ok w Pee Wee Herman adopting children...?
Zoomerang96 said:
just cause you dont agree with what the person said, does not mean you should attack them in this manner.
in a discussion, different view points are presented, for your information. and believe it or not, you may not find yourself agreeing with what everyone has to say.
martha said:Diamond, leave pedophiles out of the discussion. The question wasn't "Should pedophiles be allowed to adopt children?" Your equating pedophiles and gay men is offensive even to me, and I cut you a lot of slack, maybe too much. So knock that shit off in this thread. Start another thread for it, because we're not discussing that here.
Dreadsox said:
When are you going to cut me some slack??????
LOL
martha said:
I'll let you know.
diamond said:
Pedopliles/child murderes come from all walks of life.
Zoomerang96 said:
just cause you dont agree with what the person said, does not mean you should attack them in this manner.
in a discussion, different view points are presented, for your information. and believe it or not, you may not find yourself agreeing with what everyone has to say.
martha said:
Almost 100% of those are MEN.
If you want to start shit, we can go.
paxetaurora said:
I'm ready to go, martha, howsabout you?
diamond said:no duh..they are men .
now a break down of their sexual preference..is the next logical question.
Is it a 90/10 percent split? like the general population or not?
I dont have the answer, do you?
diamond
melon said:
You know what? This upsets me. I, and many others like me, have spent our entire fucking life looking for approval and acceptance in Christianity...only to run into flat out insulting statements like these. And are you being insulting on purpose? From what it reads, not at all...and that's what upsets me the most.
"Twisting nature."
"Raising standards."
Yes, you don't need to say it a third time. You think homosexuals, either consciously or subconsciously, are unnatural freaks undeserving of even the most basic of human emotions. Honestly? At a theoretic level, I would love to deprive you of all love, take away any chances for you having children, nonchalantly call you a "defective sinner" who just didn't have "enough faith" your entire life, and see how you would have turned out in this world. If anything, Christianity is devoid of empathy, a lost art in human emotions...and I've often wondered why I've even given a fuck all these years about Christianity, considering how "un-Christian" it is in practice.
Melon
Achtung_Bebe said:all i can say to this is that you mistook a few of my quotes there, I wasn't even referring to the gay act by saying "twisting nature" and "raising standards"... twisting nature as in what would be occuring should a same sex couple become parents. Can you deny this? Does reproduction allow this? No and that's all I meant...... not referring to "unnatural freaks" at all.
And when I spoke of raising standards I was referring to things such as abortion... these standards set by society, not standards within the "unnatural freak" as you have suggested I meant it. You drew the conclusion that I am a horrible individual that gains excitement out of sitting back and labelling homosexuals as evil scum on the face of this Earth, and THAT upsets me, because I went out of my way to make it clear that I do not hold this prejudice.
If it were still in my power I would close this thread immediately