Same Sex Marriage Thread - Part III - Page 23 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-02-2013, 08:28 AM   #441
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,676
Local Time: 04:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martha View Post
It's good to know that the Republicans are taking care of what really matters:

Shameful: So-Called ‘Marriage Protection Amendment’ Introduced in House | Human Rights Campaign
Rep. Heulskamp's photo:

__________________

Diemen is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 08:37 AM   #442
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,778
Local Time: 10:02 AM




It's really sad that people that close minded are actually a representative of something...
__________________

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 12:14 PM   #443
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
I wasn't thinking of your recent tirades against religion when I made that statement. My statement covers about 7, 8, 9 years of "acceptable target" hypocrisy from the 'tolerant' Left of FYM. And it's not just Christians and it's not just regarding Christians and homosexuality.

In fact, your religion thread (and some of the reaction to it) where you had a nice go at Islam is a PERFECT illustration of what I really mean. You were picking on a target that wasn't acceptable. You should have gone after Christians. Then it would have been very popular. THIS is all I'm saying.
Oh, gotcha. Then I pretty much agree with you here

Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post

This always rubbed me the wrong way.



Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
You're pretty cool beans yourself, Jive. I changed my avatar back in your honor.

As an added bonus, your avatar automatically commands a sense of respect and admiration.


Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
Right! The teaching of all major religions going back thousands of years, all the marriage laws and jurisprudence of all previous governments and societies, and the personal beliefs of 2000 years of previous generations... all, all of, must now be worthless.

Apparently to some all wisdom begins the day one is born. Most certainly on this issue because to hold the belief that:
1) marriage requires a bride and a groom
2) a husband and a wife compliment each other in a way two members of the same gender cannot
3) or that children benefit from having both a mother and a father

is not only anti-gay, it's antiquated, it's bigoted, it's totally unsupported by one shred of evidence and apparently for those stubborn, "non-evolving," knuckledragging types such as myself -- the result of being bamboozled by "the conservative media-entertainment complex."

Can I just say your sanctimonious arrogance is breathtaking, with all due respect of course.

As I've said before, I understand why many people support SSM. I regret that the sentiment is rarely returned by its proponents.
What other 2000 year old laws would you like to bring back? If you like, we could list some for you.
An appeal to antiquity might be the most self deceptive, ignorant justification there is. You're in the medical field? What 2000 year old medical practices do you still defend?
Jive Turkey is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 03:13 PM   #444
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,676
Local Time: 04:02 AM
Blood letting to flush evil spirits is woefully underutilized.
Diemen is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 04:23 PM   #445
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 02:02 AM
HRC's been on fire lately:

Top NOM Staffer Abruptly Ends Radio Interview | Human Rights Campaign

You should listen. It's only 3 minutes long.
martha is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 04:30 PM   #446
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 05:02 AM
hahahaha

pretty much "errrrrrrrrrrr...bye"
Jive Turkey is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 08:46 PM   #447
Refugee
 
Cactus Annie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Mighty Jagrafess of the Holy Hadrojassic Maxaroedenfoe
Posts: 2,146
Local Time: 09:02 AM
Boom Boom
Cactus Annie is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 12:01 AM   #448
Blue Crack Supplier
 
IWasBored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 36,784
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diemen View Post
Blood letting to flush evil spirits is woefully underutilized.
Hmmm, leeches on the ambulance? DO NOT WANT.
IWasBored is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 12:07 AM   #449
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 02:02 AM
I suppose most are missing the moment where the host states, "I think the societal ideal is for kids to be raised in a heterosexual, married environment." That is not a statement that should be so quickly disregarded.
AEON is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 12:30 AM   #450
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWasBored View Post
Hmmm, leeches on the ambulance? DO NOT WANT.
Leeches are still occasionally used for establishing bloodflow in reattached limbs
Jive Turkey is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 09:30 AM   #451
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,858
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
I suppose most are missing the moment where the host states, "I think the societal ideal is for kids to be raised in a heterosexual, married environment." That is not a statement that should be so quickly disregarded.


no, i listened to the whole thing, and he's incorrect -- the children of gays and lesbians do as well if not better than the children of heterosexual parents.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 09:35 AM   #452
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Aside from it being incorrect, it is worthwhile noting that people who are relying on the "societal ideal parenting" line of thought to argue against SSM are not applying it to other situations.

If one believes that the ideal situation is for a child to be raised by a mother and a father joined in marriage and that situations falling short of that ideal should not be permissible, then why not also ban (i) single mothers; (ii) single fathers; (iii) children being raised by a grandparent; (iv) children being raised by a single, older sibling, etc, etc.
anitram is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 10:07 AM   #453
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
I suppose most are missing the moment where the host states, "I think the societal ideal is for kids to be raised in a heterosexual, married environment." That is not a statement that should be so quickly disregarded.
No, that was the point. The dude hangs up on a guy who is agreeing with him on a key point.
martha is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 12:02 PM   #454
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
Aside from it being incorrect, it is worthwhile noting that people who are relying on the "societal ideal parenting" line of thought to argue against SSM are not applying it to other situations.
.
This host was in support of SSM, but he also conceded near the beginning of the interview that the societal ideal for parenting is for heterosexual, married couples.
AEON is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 12:07 PM   #455
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,858
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post

This host was in support of SSM, but he also conceded near the beginning of the interview that the societal ideal for parenting is for heterosexual, married couples.
Conceded? Or just agreed?

What Thomas Peters couldn't do was acknowledge the fact that some people get married with no intention of having children. And that gay adoption is legal almost everywhere. And the reason why is that kids do just as well if not better with L/G parents.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 01:36 PM   #456
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
Conceded? Or just agreed?

What Thomas Peters couldn't do was acknowledge the fact that some people get married with no intention of having children. And that gay adoption is legal almost everywhere. And the reason why is that kids do just as well if not better with L/G parents.
He may have agreed instead of conceded, I'll grant you that.

I just wanted to point out that there is still a societal ideal - and that it does deserve a little respect. That's all.
AEON is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 01:46 PM   #457
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
I just wanted to point out that there is still a societal ideal - and that it does deserve a little respect. That's all.
What I find curious is - let's say we accept that a child raised by a mother and a father united in marriage is the societal ideal.

Then how do you rank all other unideal situations?

Is a single mom better than two lesbian moms? Is a single dad worse than two gay dads? Is a grandmother better than a single, lesbian mom?

I mean, how else do you come to conclude that the only group whose rights are going to be in jeopardy are gays and lesbians?
anitram is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 01:57 PM   #458
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 04:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
I just wanted to point out that there is still a societal ideal - and that it does deserve a little respect. That's all.
Not all societal ideals deserve respect, i.e. race and marriage

Do I think the ideal situation is to be raised by the man and woman that made you? Sure, but guess what? I don't have that ideal situation. I was raised by another man and woman, who did an amazing job might I add. BUT I have absolutely no clue of my medical history and that's something that still to this day bothers me. Now my cousin didn't have that ideal situation because his father died before he was born.

But I also know A LOT of people that were raised in that "ideal" situation and had absolutely shitty childhood filled with abuse and neglect.

I think it's important for male or female to have both male and female role models in their childhood, but that doesn't mean they're going to have a mom and a dad. Gay adoption, open adoption, single mothers, single fathers, grandparent raising their grandchildren, etc. the family dynamic has changed, and you will find awesome examples and crap examples in almost every scenario you can think of.

So if one was really truly concerned about how the child will be raised, why are they not trying to legislate parenting instead of targeting just one group?
BVS is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 02:09 PM   #459
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,900
Local Time: 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
What I find curious is - let's say we accept that a child raised by a mother and a father united in marriage is the societal ideal.

Then how do you rank all other unideal situations?

Is a single mom better than two lesbian moms? Is a single dad worse than two gay dads? Is a grandmother better than a single, lesbian mom?

I mean, how else do you come to conclude that the only group whose rights are going to be in jeopardy are gays and lesbians?

Two is more ideal than one no matter the gender of the two. Parenting is hard. I don't know how people do it alone.

(Though I know it can be done, and done well. After all I was raised by a single mom and she did an OUTSTANDING job! I just know that it's easier if you have two)
maycocksean is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 04:42 PM   #460
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
What I find curious is - let's say we accept that a child raised by a mother and a father united in marriage is the societal ideal.

Then how do you rank all other unideal situations?

Is a single mom better than two lesbian moms? Is a single dad worse than two gay dads? Is a grandmother better than a single, lesbian mom?

I mean, how else do you come to conclude that the only group whose rights are going to be in jeopardy are gays and lesbians?
I guess I would personally rank the "next best thing" as similar to what BVS described - a model of the societal ideal, a mother and father. I would not rank a gay/lesbian couple as desirable as this.

I think that by living in a homosexual partnership, a consequence (or a benefit, depends on the couple) of that partnership is no children by natural means. Yes, there are male and female couples that can't have children, and they adopt or get artificially inseminated. Do I find this acceptable? Yes, because they can at least "model" the ideal situation. And in the Scriptures that I follow, which is my source of wisdom - even Jesus grew up in a less than ideal situation. But he had a step-dad, and that is a model for a father.

Now, the question is - how far away from the ideal should we allow? My conscience tells me that a gay or lesbian couple adopting is too far away from that ideal. I know that my mind is biased - and that I risk being called a bigot, but my conscience remains convinced of this point despite the social pressure to think otherwise. I realize that in 20 years some may look at this post and think, "wow" - people actually thought that way. Heck - in 20 years I may eventually change my mind on this, I've changed it before. But as of this moment - when I see a picture of a gay lesbian couple holding a baby - I can't help to think it is more about the couple than it is about the child.
__________________

AEON is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×