Saddam to be Executed next month.

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BrownEyedBoy said:


Why is your focus on the murderer? Why are you trying to make excuses for a MURDERER? There is NO EXCUSE FOR MURDER. Why do you have such sympathy for murderers? I will never understand that. :tsk:

well, you obviously still don't get his point.

his focus is on the murderer, because the murderer is the problem that needs to be taken care of by society. just like your focus is on the murderer; you only disagree on what needs to be done with him/her.

if a child has been brutally beaten and sexually abused by a swine of a father every day through 18 years and suddenly one day, in a moment of rage, stabs him in the back with a knife, would you decide to give this 18-year-old the death penalty?
 
Justin24 said:
omg I am not using emotion. I just want him dead. Your the one brining emotion into this also if your saying I am, because you have respect for his life, by not wanting him dead.

Take a look at your posts, they are filled with anger and are all emotionally charged. "I just want him dead", is an emotional response, it comes with no logical reasoning.

I've never responded emotional in this thread, I never said anything about his life in paticular.
 
BrownEyedBoy said:


Why is your focus on the murderer? Why are you trying to make excuses for a MURDERER? There is NO EXCUSE FOR MURDER. Why do you have such sympathy for murderers? I will never understand that. :tsk:

Why do you live in such a simple world?
 
Can you honestly say, this is to all the anti-death penalty opponents that never once in your life, you felt he/she deserved the DP?

Why is my view on the DP wrong? There is no wrong or right in this. This is my beliefs, like your belief that Abortion is ok.
 
BrownEyedBoy said:
Of course not.

She should be a free person in my book. Her government failed in protecting her and cannot blame her for trying to help herself.

See this is where you constantly contradict yourself. The example he gave IS murder. It's just justiable murder in your eyes.

So once again you contradict yourself.
 
I really want to know your backround on why you never supported the DP, what made you see it as something wrong? Is it because of religion, morals what?
 
Justin24 said:
Can you honestly say, this is to all the anti-death penalty opponents that never once in your life, you felt he/she deserved the DP?

Why is my view on the DP wrong? There is no wrong or right in this.

No one deserves death. No one.

Yes, there is a wrong and right.

Don't coward out by bringing in another issue, you don't know my full view on that issue, so don't pretend to do so.
 
Justin24 said:
I really want to know your backround on why you never supported the DP, what made you see it as something wrong? Is it because of religion, morals what?

I've answered this question about 50 times for you, I don't know any other way to explain it so that you get it. Sorry.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


See this is where you constantly contradict yourself. The example he gave IS murder. It's just justiable murder in your eyes.

So once again you contradict yourself.

That's a good point. I didn't explain myself at all. A murder as an initial act (say someone who doesn't have anything to do with their eventual murderer) is inexcusable.
 
BrownEyedBoy said:


That's a good point. I didn't explain myself at all. A murder as an initial act (say someone who doesn't have anything to do with their eventual murderer) is inexcusable.

Well then this changes your stance somewhat now doesn't it?
 
well, take a look at these quotes:

BrownEyedBoy said:
If the punishment for murder is your own execution then by murdering someone you are accepting the terms and conditions of your government and so accepting to be executed. That simple.

If you know what the punishment is for a certain act and you don't like then DON'T DO IT.

BrownEyedBoy said:



I have proven that not murdering anyone is really what I least expect from someone who wants to be a part of society. That's it.

You KNEW the rules, you still went ahead and did it, YOU brought this upon yourself. End of story.

and...

BrownEyedBoy said:
Of course not.

She should be a free person in my book. Her government failed in protecting her and cannot blame her for trying to help herself.
 
Justin24 said:
omg I am not using emotion. I just want him dead. Your the one brining emotion into this also if your saying I am, because you have respect for his life, by not wanting him dead.

Ok, so you say you aren't using emotion. So tell us, without saying anything about anyone's (your's, the friends and relatives of the victims, the Iraqi people's, etc.) desire or wish for his death, how his execution benefits society.


BrownEyedBoy -- feel free to answer as well.
 
BrownEyedBoy said:


That's a good point. I didn't explain myself at all. A murder as an initial act (say someone who doesn't have anything to do with their eventual murderer) is inexcusable.

so the world isn't black and white, after all?
 
Well my stance will always be for Death. That time when I said you won, was to be sarcastic.
 
indra said:


Ok, so you say you aren't using emotion. So tell us, without saying anything about anyone's (your's, the friends and relatives of the victims, the Iraqi people's, etc.) desire or wish for his death, how his execution benefits society.


BrownEyedBoy -- feel free to answer as well.

It deters crime. If we didn't wait years to execute someone and showed we mean business then crime (murder) would be reduced.
 
Justin24 said:


It deters crime. If we didn't wait years to execute someone and showed we mean business then crime (murder) would be reduced.

Any proof to this? Seriously how would it deter crime? How many murders are crimes of passion, how many are crimes they think they've covered and will get away with...

This is just a myth to allow certain people to feel better at night.
 
Justin24 said:


It deters crime. If we didn't wait years to execute someone and showed we mean business then crime (murder) would be reduced.

is that why the u.s. (or any other country with death penalty) is such a peaceful society with such a low crime rate?

oh, the solution is to just execute a little quicker?
 
Last edited:
Justin24 said:


It deters crime. If we didn't wait years to execute someone and showed we mean business then crime (murder) would be reduced.

Um...no. At least in my state where the death penalty is still abided by, the crime rate is higher than the sun. at one point richmond was considered the murder capital of the world.

the death penalty is archaic and ineffective. how are we showing God's forgiveness (I only bring this up because I've read that you are a Christian) by killing people ourselves? "Whatever you do to the least of you, you do to me."

Blood will never wash away the tears.

I do respect you Justin, but time and time again you contradict yourself.

Btw, U2man, I don't know if I've seen you post inf FYM before. Welcome :)
 
How does putting some one in jail deter crime. Maybe we should follow Chinas example on execution.

I guess we dont mind paying for new prisons.
 
Justin24 said:


It deters crime. If we didn't wait years to execute someone and showed we mean business then crime (murder) would be reduced.

sorry, is this saddam talking? i cannot tell.

hi ms. mia :sexywink:
 
Justin24 said:
How does putting some one in jail deter crime. Maybe we should follow Chinas example on execution.

Rehabilitation. Giving people second chances. Teaching them what they weren't taught before. Taking responsibility as a society for taking care of one another. That is what works. Death isn't the only punishment there is to offer. Atonement can be much more powerful.
 
If they did not care and are in jail because of it, what makes you think they will want to rehabillitate themselves in jail? Especially with all the different prison gangs?
 
Justin24 said:


It deters crime. If we didn't wait years to execute someone and showed we mean business then crime (murder) would be reduced.

Ah, like Iraq is doing. I notice their murder rate is nice and low, isn't it? :yes:
 
Justin24 said:
If they did not care and are in jail because of it, what makes you think they will want to rehabillitate themselves in jail? Especially with all the different prison gangs?

Perhaps you haven't had any friends or family members locked up? I'm not saying everyone should b/c it will better their lives, but maybe because of personal experiences we share different opinions on this? All my life growing up I've had friends and family in and out of jail.

If you haven't yet, I definitely recommend doing some prison ministry work. Just visiting them, talking to them, seeing them as human beings, may change your mind. Or it may not, I don't know. But I'm just saying, I wouldn't be so quick to just classify them as evil and kill them. They are human beings too.
 
Death penalty is a deterrent
George E. Pataki, Governor of New York State
USA Today - March 1997
Capital punishment gives killers good cause to fear arrest and conviction.

SEPT. 1, 1995, marked the end of a long fight for justice in New York and the beginning of a new era in our state that promises safer communities, fewer victims of crime, and renewed personal freedom. For 22 consecutive years, my predecessors had ignored the urgent calls for justice from our citizens their repeated and pressing demands for the death penalty in New York State. Even after the legislature passed a reinstatement of the capital punishment law, it was vetoed for 18 years in a row. (Twelve of those vetoes came from the pen of former Gov. Mario Cuomo.)

That was wrong. To fight and deter crime effectively, individuals must have every tool government can afford them, including the death penalty. Upon taking office, I immediately began the process of reinstating the death penalty. Two months later, I signed the death penalty into law for the most heinous and ruthless killers in our society.

Protecting the residents of New York against crime and violence is my first priority. Indeed, it is the most fundamental duty of government. For too long, coddling of criminals allowed unacceptable levels of violence to permeate the streets. They were not subject to swift and certain punishment and, as a result, violent criminal acts were not deterred.

For more than two decades, New York was without the death penalty. During this time, fear of crime was compounded by the fact that, too often, it largely went unpunished.

No more. In New York, the death penalty has turned the tables on fear and put it back where it belongs-in the hearts of criminals. Within just one year, the death penalty helped produce a dramatic drop in violent crime. Just as important, it has restored New Yorkers' confidence in the justice system because they know their government genuinely is committed to their safety.

Honest, hard-working people share my vision for a safer New York, a place where children can play outside without worry; parents can send their kids to school with peace of mind; people can turn to each other on any street corner, in any subway, at any hour, without casting a suspicious eye; and New York citizens of all races, religions, and ages pull together and stand firm against crime.

In short, we are creating a state where law-abiding citizens have unlimited freedom from crime - a state where all can raise a family and follow their dreams in neighborhoods, streets, and schools that are free from the scourge of crime and violence. We've made tremendous progress. Although the death penalty has contributed to that progress, it's just one facet of New York's broad anti-crime strategy.

Other major reforms include substantially increasing the sentences for all violent criminals; eliminating parole eligibility for virtually all repeat violent offenders; barring murderers and sex offenders from participating in work release programs; toughening penalties for perpetrators of domestic violence; notifying communities as to the whereabouts of convicted sex offenders; overturning court created criminal-friendly loopholes to make it easier to prosecute violent criminals; and allowing juries to impose a sentence of life without parole for killers.

Arthur Shawcross (left) was paroled after serving 15 years for the brutal rape and murder of two children in upstate New York. In a subsequent 21 month killing spree, he took 11 more lives before being caught. Serial killer Nathaniel White triggered this outburst from the mother of one of his victims: "I have to go to the cemetery to see my daughter. Nathaniel White's mother goes to jail to see him and I don't think it's fair." With the death penalty reinstated in New York, such ruthless killers will face execution, rather than being released from prison for good behavior.

These new laws are working. Since I took office in 1995, violent crime has dropped 23, assaults are down 22, and murders have dropped by nearly one-third. New Yorkers now live in safer communities because we finally have begun to create a climate that protects and empowers our citizens, while giving criminals good cause to fear arrest and conviction. I believe this has occurred in part because of the strong signal that the death penalty and our other tough new laws sent to violent criminals and murderers: You will be punished with the full force of the law. Shortly before the death penalty went into effect, I listened to the families of 20 murder victims as they told of their pain. No loved ones should have to go through such a wrenching experience. I never will forget the words of Janice Hunter, whose 27-year-old daughter, Adrien, was stabbed 47 times by serial killer Nathaniel White in 1992. Mrs. Hunter spoke for every family member when she said, "It's a heartache that all parents suffer. I have to go to the cemetery to see my daughter. Nathaniel White's mother goes to jail to see him and I don't think it's fair." Although no law can bring back Mrs. Hunter's daughter, our laws can and must take every responsible step to prevent others from enduring the heartache suffered by her and her family. Before becoming Governor, I supported the death penalty because of my firm conviction that it would act as a significant deterrent and provide a true measure of justice to murder victims and their loved ones.

I know, as do most New Yorkers, that by restoring the death penalty, we have saved lives. Somebody's mother, somebody's brother, somebody's child is alive today because we were strong enough to be tough enough to care enough to do what was necessary to protect the innocent. Preventing a crime from being committed ultimately is more important than punishing criminals after they have shattered innocent lives.

No case illustrates this point more clearly than that of Arthur Shawcross. In 1973, Shawcross, one of New York's most ruthless serial killers, was convicted of the brutal rape and murder of two children in upstate New York. Since the death penalty had been declared unconstitutional, Shawcross was sentenced to prison. After serving just 15 years-an absurd prison term given the crime-he was paroled in 1988. In a horrific 21-month killing spree, Shawcross took 11 more lives. That is 11 innocent people who would be alive today had justice been served 24 years ago; 11 families that would have been spared the pain and agony of losing a loved one.

By reinstating the death penalty, New York has sent a clear message to criminals that the lives of our children are worth more than just a IS-year prison term. Moreover, it has given prosecutors the legal wherewithal to ensure New York State never has another Arthur Shawcross. Applying the ultimate punishment Too often, we are confronted with wanton acts of violence that cry out for justice. The World Trade Center bombing and the murderous rampage on the Long Island Rail Road by Colin Ferguson are but two examples. The slaying of a police officer in the line of duty is another. To kill a police officer is to commit an act of war against civilized society.

A person who knowingly commits such a heinous act poses a serious threat to us all, for government can not protect citizens without doing everything it can to protect those charged with our safety. Police officers put their lives on the line, not knowing whether their next traffic stop or call to duty will be their last.

Under New York's death penalty law, those who murder a police officer; a probation, parole, court, or corrections officer; a judge; or a witness or member of a witness' family can face the death penalty. Someone who murders while already serving life in prison, escaping from prison, or committing other serious felonies can face the death penalty.

Contract killers, serial murderers, those who torture their victims, or those who have murdered before also can be sentenced to death. In determining whether the death penalty should be imposed on anyone convicted of first-degree murder, the bill expressly authorizes juries to hear and consider additional evidence whenever the murder was committed as part of an act of terrorism or by someone with two or more prior serious felony convictions.

New York's death penalty is crafted carefully so that only the most inhuman murderers are eligible for it. Upon the conviction of the defendant, a separate sentencing phase is conducted during which the original jury, or a new jury under special circumstances, weighs the facts of the case.

The jury must consider the defendant's prior criminal history, mental capacity, character, background, state of mind, and the extent of his or her participation in the crime. It then compares this evidence with the facts. For the death penalty to be imposed, the jury must reach a verdict unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt.

Our state lived without adequate protection for 22 years. That is 22 years too long. Now, finally, we have begun to empower New Yorkers with the legal tools they need to make their communities safe.

At the same time, we have put lawless sociopaths like Arthur Shawcross on notice. The time that Shawcross spent in prison was not punishment; it was a mere inconvenience that offered New Yorkers nothing more than a 15-year moratorium from his murderous acts.

Our resolve to end crime is only as strong as the laws we pass to punish criminals. By making the death penalty the law of the land in New York, we have demonstrated that resolve, thus strengthening the promise that our children and future generations will grow up in a state that is free of violence. The death penalty and the other tough initiatives we have passed are just the beginning of an aggressive and comprehensive plan to reclaim our streets and give New Yorkers back the fundamental freedoms they too often felt had been lost to crime and violence. We will continue to do whatever is necessary to ensure that the lives of New Yorkers are unencumbered by violence, and that is why we will continue to pass laws that give our people unlimited Freedom to pursue their hopes and dreams.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 30, 1996

Statement on Anniversary of Death Penalty by Governor Pataki


Since I became Governor, violent crime has declined 11 percent, with murder showing the largest decline at even more than 22 percent. New Yorkers live in safer communities today because we are finally creating a climate that protects our citizens and causes criminals to fear arrest, prosecution and punishment.

We believe that this has occurred in part because of the strong signal that the death penalty sent to violent criminals and murderers: we won't excuse criminals, we will punish them. Last September 1 marked a new era in our fight against crime. The death penalty became the law of New York State.

Shortly before the death penalty went into effect I listened to the families of 20 murder victims as they told of their pain. No family should have to go through such a wrenching experience. I will never forget the words of Janice Hunter, whose 27-year-old daughter was stabbed 47 times by serial killer Nathaniel White in 1992.

Mrs. Hunter spoke for all the families when she said, "It's a heartache that all parents suffer. I have to go to the cemetery to see my daughter. Nathaniel White's mother goes to jail to see him and I don't think it's fair."

While no law can bring back Mrs. Hunter's daughter, our laws can and must take every responsible step to prevent other families from suffering the heartache suffered by Mrs. Hunter and her family. I sponsored the death penalty laws because of my firm conviction that it would act as a significant deterrent and provide a true measure of justice to murder victims and their loved ones.

I know, and most New Yorkers know, that by restoring the death penalty we have saved lives. There are loved ones alive today because we were strong enough to be tough enough to care enough to do what was necessary to protect innocent people. Preventing a crime from being a crime is ultimately more important than punishing criminals for crime after crime.

My administration has been actively monitoring our death penalty law. I have every confidence that it will continue to deter murders, will continue to enhance public safety and will be enforced fairly and justly.

We have a right to be proud. By standing strong, we have moved New York forward to becoming a safer and better place to live.
http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/Articles/Pataki.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom