Reviving Jim Crow? - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-22-2005, 09:23 AM   #1
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,435
Local Time: 01:34 AM
Reviving Jim Crow?

The title of the article says it all....I'd say this is an issue to do a Foucs-on-the Family style e-mail bombardment of the Justice Dept with. Surely the JD has a website with a list of the names of its members.

PS WHY is it that I have a problem linking Wash post articles???? Can someone post this on here?? Thanks....

Teta040 is offline  
Old 08-22-2005, 10:24 AM   #2
love, blood, life
FizzingWhizzbees's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the choirgirl hotel
Posts: 12,614
Local Time: 01:34 AM
I suspect it could be because the Washington Post requires readers to register before accessing its content, meaning that when someone who isn't registered clicks on your link they don't see the article you're referring to. Or it could be that the URL for each article varies depending on the person's registration.

It's probably best if you quite a paragraph or two from the article (use the [ quote ] [/ quote ] tags) so people can see basically what the article is about and then they can decide to register with the site if they wish to read the rest of the article.

FizzingWhizzbees is offline  
Old 08-22-2005, 10:34 AM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
deep's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,600
Local Time: 05:34 PM
Reviving Jim Crow?

By David J. Becker
Monday, August 22, 2005; A17

Any day now the Justice Department will render judgment on one of the single most discriminatory pieces of voting legislation of recent years: a Georgia state law requiring voters to present one of only six forms of photo identification before they can exercise their right to vote. Before enforcing this statute, Georgia must get Justice Department approval by proving that the law will not put minority voters in a worse position than they were in before the requirement was instituted.

The facts surrounding Georgia's voter identification requirement cannot be disputed. Virtually every black legislator opposes the legislation, and most black lawmakers staged a walkout to protest its passage. Every major civil rights and minority advocacy group, including the NAACP, and many legal scholars, oppose the restriction; several have submitted comments to the Justice Department for consideration.

Additionally, it is surprisingly difficult to obtain a photo ID in Georgia. Though the state has 159 counties, there are only 56 places in which residents can obtain a driver's license, and not one is within the city limits of Atlanta or within the six counties that have the highest percentage of blacks.

There is also considerable evidence that photo ID requirements have a disproportionately negative impact on blacks and other minorities. The Justice Department found as recently as a decade ago that blacks in Louisiana were four to five times less likely than whites to have photo IDs.

Studies in other states indicate similar disparities. Consequently, the Michigan attorney general deemed a less restrictive voter identification bill unconstitutional, and the Federal Election Commission reported that photo identification requirements impose an undue and potentially discriminatory burden on citizens exercising their right to vote. Indeed, the Justice Department rejected a less restrictive Louisiana law in 1994 and 1995.

The law's proponents claim that it will help protect against voter fraud, but there appears to be no evidence to support this claim. Georgians already have to show one of 17 forms of ID to prove that they are who they say they are when they vote. Georgia's chief elections official, Secretary of State Cathy Cox, has said that not one instance of voter fraud relating to impersonation at the polls has been documented during her tenure.

Furthermore, while purporting to combat fraud, the Georgia law expressly excludes absentee ballots from the ID requirement. While all the evidence indicates that minorities are far less likely to vote absentee than whites, absentee balloting is the only form of voting in which there is documented fraud in Georgia. The exclusion of absentee ballots from the identification requirement raises serious questions about whether the anti-fraud justification for the law is purely pretextual.

One thing is certain: If this law is approved, it will be more difficult for minorities to vote in Georgia -- the home of John Lewis and Martin Luther King Jr. -- than in any other state.

In addition, federal support for Georgia's restrictions would probably open the floodgates for similar discriminatory laws in other jurisdictions.

Indiana recently passed such a law, as has Wisconsin (though Wisconsin's Democratic governor vetoed the legislation), and it's likely that legislatures in Florida, Texas, South Carolina, South Dakota and other Republican-controlled states are watching to see what the Justice Department will do. We'll soon discover whether the Justice Department accepts its role as the last line of defense for minority voter rights or becomes the very instrument for the suppression of those rights.
deep is offline  
Old 08-26-2005, 09:35 PM   #4
Rock n' Roll Doggie
U2Bama's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gulf Coast State of Mine
Posts: 3,405
Local Time: 07:34 PM

I tend to disagree with the assertion that requiring all voters to show a state-issued form of picture ID is a denial of anyone's rigth to vote. I live in a predominantly caucasian, Republican county and I have to show mine. I recall a rather liberal Democratic interferencer from Los Angeles, California who used to post in here and he was shocked that we didn't have to show picture ID a few years ago, because in his community it had always been required.

U2Bama is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright ©