Reuters accused of widespread racism in US class-action lawsuit

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Dreadsox

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Messages
10,885
The Reuters news group and one of its US subsidiaries is being sued for racial discrimination over allegations that a "white, public school attitude" tolerated and encouraged a racist environment in which black employees were abused and persecuted.

OK...I am taking a deep breath....but someone needs to help me out here. What the :censored: does "white, public school attitude" mean?

The class action announced yesterday alleges that black employees at Radianz ? a US-based internet services subsidiary of Reuters ? were forced to work in "an outrageous, patently offensive environment". One black employee was repeatedly referred to as "my ******" by a white supervisor and was sent racially offensive emails, the action alleges.

If true this is wrong. The rest of the article has other details. Again, everyone deserves their day in court. However, if found guilty good for the plaintifs.


AS for the school comment...help...I do not get it!!!
 
Dreadsox said:


OK...I am taking a deep breath....but someone needs to help me out here. What the :censored: does "white, public school attitude" mean?



If true this is wrong. The rest of the article has other details. Again, everyone deserves their day in court. However, if found guilty good for the plaintifs.


AS for the school comment...help...I do not get it!!!


here is the entire article for context

Reuters accused of widespread racism in US class-action lawsuit
By Andrew Buncombe
01 August 2003


The Reuters news group and one of its US subsidiaries is being sued for racial discrimination over allegations that a "white, public school attitude" tolerated and encouraged a racist environment in which black employees were abused and persecuted.

The class action announced yesterday alleges that black employees at Radianz ? a US-based internet services subsidiary of Reuters ? were forced to work in "an outrageous, patently offensive environment". One black employee was repeatedly referred to as "my ******" by a white supervisor and was sent racially offensive emails, the action alleges.

"It's astounding," said Douglas Wigdor, one of the lawyers bringing the action on behalf of two employees and one former member of staff. "The only way I can account for this is that the management have done nothing about this. The company's general counsel told one of our clients that nothing could be done because the company is run by white men from England and 'what can you do about it'. It's that public school mentality."

Asked if he thought it would have happened if the management had been American, he said: "There are plenty of American companies where racism happens ? but I think it would have been less likely that it would have been done on such a wide-scale basis."

Mr Wigdor said that one of the employees being represented in the class action, Eric Berry, repeatedly endured racial slurs from his white supervisor and was often the butt of racist jokes. He also received an email from a white supervisor, David Flynn, which depicted an electronically altered photograph of Mr Berry with a noose around his neck, fang-like teeth, braids in his hair and a large black penis. The email has been obtained by The Independent. Another email sent to Mr Berry depicted a scantily clad "Miss South Africa" with an ape's head placed on top of a woman's torso. Mr Wigdor, whose law firm was responsible for the recent class action against Macy's stores for the racial profiling of people suspected of shoplifting, said that a number of Radianz's 27 black employees received similar emails.

The class action is being assisted by celebrity lawyer Johnnie Cochran, famous for defending OJ Simpson. Mr Cochran said: "It is difficult to imagine how, in 2003, a company like Reuters could tolerate this sort of overt racist behaviour at the highest level in a business that it created and now controls." He added: "This lawsuit is meant to bring Reuters, Equant [the co-owners] and Radianz into the 21st century, to stop the disgusting practice of racism within these companies and to send a message that such immoral behaviour will not be tolerated no matter how rich or powerful a company may be."

The lawsuit also alleges that black employees were routinely paid less than their white counterparts. One former employee who complained about this was allegedly fired by the company. Peter Snowden, who had been a technical engineer at Radianz, said: "Not only does Radianz continue to tolerate racial harassment in the workplace and pay its African-American employees less than similarly situated white employees, the company looks at African-American employees as troublemakers and gives white employees the benefit of the doubt."

Radianz was created by Reuters and Equant in June 2000. Reuters owns a controlling 51 per cent in the company and the telecommunications company Equant holds 49 per cent. In a statement, Radianz said that inquiries into Mr Berry's complaint had resulted in one employee being fired and three others receiving disciplinary action. "Radianz absolutely denies any and all allegations that it engages in or tolerates discriminatory workplace practices of any kind," it said. Nancy Bobrowitz, a spokeswoman for Reuters America, said: "Reuters does not tolerate any form of discrimination within our own firm and we will not tolerate it in any of our affiliates."

Dread,,

ok, you can exhale now.

it has nothing to do with your public school or any public school in America.

The Independent is a UK newspaper and they are most likely referring to the British public school system. Maybe some of our UK members can enlighten us to this term.

here is the remark again
The company's general counsel told one of our clients that nothing could be done because the company is run by white men from England and 'what can you do about it'. It's that public school mentality
 
Um...I read the article...Still do not get it....That is why I asked. LOL
 
It's a British thing, which is why I should perhaps shut up and let Fizz or Anthony answer this. I'll give it a shot. It's a class-snobbery thing. It concerns upper-class snobs who send their kids to what's called "public school" in the U.K. I used to know why these schools are called "public", (I only know that we would call them "private" in the U.S.) now I forget dammit. :reject: :help: :banghead: :yikes: :censored:
 
As far as I know, "public school" in britainese would translate roughly into one of those snobby elite private schools that rich kids in New England go to. That puts the statement in an entirely different light.
 
Back
Top Bottom