popkidu2
War Child
I preface this post with two comments. 1. I don't have all my reading material here at my apartment, so I might be *slightly* vague with my info and 2. Hate to post and run, but that's what I'm gonna do...
Anyway.
I was watching the boston news last night, and saw that a woman driving recklessly with her kids in the vehicle and then crashed is going to claim that she sufferes from Post-Partum Depression. It some brief interviews with lawyers, and a review of the Andrea Yates case, they basically said that there is little hope that this defense will work.
The evidence that showed that Andrea Yates was mentally ill was overwhelming, and she lost her case.
It is estimated that more that 50% of the homeless, and 50% of the prison population suffer from severe and chronic mental illness, often the painfully debilitating Schizophrenia. Which, with proper care and medication, can be treated fairly well now.
The crimminal justice system defines "innocent by reason of insanity" as: A person's inability to tell right from wrong when the crime takes place.
This logic is faulty, as anyone in the mental health field knows. Whether a person knows right or wrong is not the issue. I've seen Schizophrenics who know that they are having "bad thoughts". Yet they still act on these thoughts. Why? Because there is a disconnect between different areas of the mind. It's not a matter of knowing right from wrong, good from bad, but being able to process that information and act accordingly. So what results is many very mentally ill people being sent to jail instead of treatment.
What we need, in my opinion, is a new verdict system.
Guilty by reason of Insanity: The person committed the crime while suffering from a mental illness. Evidence shows that the illness played a part in the casue for the individuals actions. Thus, the person shall be committed to a Psychiatric hospital, with restrictions to their contact with society, until such time as they are deemed mentally stable. In cases of severe and chronic mental illness, their stay in the hospital should equall what their sentance would be for a "sane" person going to jail. For less severe and "non-chronic" illnesses, after they are deemed mentally stable, they should be transferred to prison to serve their sentances (I have reservations about sending anyone to prison because the conditions are so severe that it actually *causes* people to lose their minds while they are there. I have read case studies of patients who suffer from PTSD because of experiences while they were serving time in jail.
Oops, gotta run. I'll continue this later.
Anyway.
I was watching the boston news last night, and saw that a woman driving recklessly with her kids in the vehicle and then crashed is going to claim that she sufferes from Post-Partum Depression. It some brief interviews with lawyers, and a review of the Andrea Yates case, they basically said that there is little hope that this defense will work.
The evidence that showed that Andrea Yates was mentally ill was overwhelming, and she lost her case.
It is estimated that more that 50% of the homeless, and 50% of the prison population suffer from severe and chronic mental illness, often the painfully debilitating Schizophrenia. Which, with proper care and medication, can be treated fairly well now.
The crimminal justice system defines "innocent by reason of insanity" as: A person's inability to tell right from wrong when the crime takes place.
This logic is faulty, as anyone in the mental health field knows. Whether a person knows right or wrong is not the issue. I've seen Schizophrenics who know that they are having "bad thoughts". Yet they still act on these thoughts. Why? Because there is a disconnect between different areas of the mind. It's not a matter of knowing right from wrong, good from bad, but being able to process that information and act accordingly. So what results is many very mentally ill people being sent to jail instead of treatment.
What we need, in my opinion, is a new verdict system.
Guilty by reason of Insanity: The person committed the crime while suffering from a mental illness. Evidence shows that the illness played a part in the casue for the individuals actions. Thus, the person shall be committed to a Psychiatric hospital, with restrictions to their contact with society, until such time as they are deemed mentally stable. In cases of severe and chronic mental illness, their stay in the hospital should equall what their sentance would be for a "sane" person going to jail. For less severe and "non-chronic" illnesses, after they are deemed mentally stable, they should be transferred to prison to serve their sentances (I have reservations about sending anyone to prison because the conditions are so severe that it actually *causes* people to lose their minds while they are there. I have read case studies of patients who suffer from PTSD because of experiences while they were serving time in jail.
Oops, gotta run. I'll continue this later.