Poverty and Education - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-04-2007, 11:41 AM   #21
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha


I'd post more, but I have an entire day odf schoolwork ahead of me today. Have a nice day off Dread.
Haha! Like I said, make it personal....Must be us lazy administrators who get the weekend off with those parents who screw everything up.

Have fun Martha...

I will be working on my school improvement plan today, my presentation for the school committee, and my analysis of the NCLB report for the school, finalizing the standards for the new reports card, finishing my evaluations of three staff members, finishing my proposal for the installation of smartboards in every classroom, writing a grant.......and god willing start the budget for next year, where I will be fighting to keep classroom positions for students to have smaller class sizes.

Somewhere in there I will play daddy and go to a soccer game for my son.

So yes, I will have a productive day off.
__________________

Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 11:50 AM   #22
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha


1. Not enough kids on free/reduced lunch.

really, never been in school without it.
__________________

Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 01:37 PM   #23
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox


really, never been in school without it.
They do exist, and we do ok without federal funds. Although smartboards would be cool, we make do with old whitebaords our PTA bought for us.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 01:38 PM   #24
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
[QU.Must be us lazy administrators who get the weekend off with those parents who screw everything up.
[/B][/QUOTE]

I can tell you moved up to administration. Once people leave the classroom, they become obsessed with statistics and are more than willing to tell teachers how to teach.

It does get personal when people from other states start telling me how to teach.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 01:40 PM   #25
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by financeguy


Ahem

http://www.buymybook.co.uk/irony_detector.htm
You're difficult to read sometimes.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 01:41 PM   #26
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
And this is why I try to avoid education threads.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:25 PM   #27
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha


I can tell you moved up to administration. Once people leave the classroom, they become obsessed with statistics and are more than willing to tell teachers how to teach.

It does get personal when people from other states start telling me how to teach.
This is is typical of those in the profession who want to go back to the days, where their classroom was an island, and they could teach in isolation, and there was no accountability for anything they taught. And the problem is the kids we are given, or the grade below us, or the television, or the parents.....but never look in the mirror, because it can never be what we are doing in the classroom. Show me poeple in the profession who make adjustments are willing to try new things that have worked in other places, and I will show you a staff that is successful

Nowhere in this thread did I tell you how to teach. I spoke about someting I tried with TITLE ONE children that worked to improve their results. Having never had the challenge of working with TITLE ONE children, I understand you could give a SHITE about someone in the profession who met with success. It is far easier to slander them, and take personal digs at them for moving into administration.

I love this profession tremendously and if you were not making such personal comments I would have enjoyed participation in the discussion. I think it clear from my comments I was explaining something I tried and did.


Statistics have nothing to do with me, it is the culture of the building I work in. I am not the stat analyzer. As a matter of fact, every committee in my building is chaired by a TEACHER because I have faith that the TEACHER knows what they should be doing better than anyone. So, DATA, is given to me from them. The staff I work with conducts their own data analysis on each and every piece of assessment that is given. It comes from them to me. They determine what to do with the data, re-evaluate the results, and if something works, they stick with it. If it is not working, they try something else.

Your (well veiled smart ass) comments about white boards made me laugh tremendously. MY STAFF is writing grants, MY STAFF has donated the money, MY STAFF is working to bring smartboards into the classroom. They are training each other on their own time, without pay. They have created the standards based report card, without pay. They (Nurse, Teachers, Custodians, AIDES, Principa) have tutored students without pay for six week intervals. They have come in on three day weekends on their own time, without pay. We are a team. I guess, that would be a foreign concept to you based on the tone of your remarks about administrators.

You made this personal, not me.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:51 PM   #28
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
.but never look in the mirror, because it can never be what we are doing in the classroom.
Nice assumption on your part.


Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
Having never had the challenge of working with TITLE ONE children, I understand you could give a SHITE about someone in the profession who met with success.
Did you get your promotion making these kinds of assumptions?


Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
So, DATA, is given to me from them. The staff I work with conducts their own data analysis on each and every piece of assessment that is given. .....
...MY STAFF is writing grants, MY STAFF has donated the money, MY STAFF is working to bring smartboards into the classroom. They are training each other on their own time, without pay. They have created the standards based report card, without pay. They (Nurse, Teachers, Custodians, AIDES, Principa) have tutored students without pay for six week intervals. They have come in on three day weekends on their own time, without pay.
You made this personal, not me.
This is the major thing wrong with both NCLB and the non-teachers who love it: The insistance that teachers work for free. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "teamwork" and everything to do with underfunded federal mandates. This unpaid work is unfair to the teachers AND to administrators.

But if that's what makes everythning work, then do it and buckle under rather than face the problem head-on.

Dread, you know as well as I do that all education is local.

What works for your students may not work for my students, and reducing students to a plie of DATA isn't serving anyone. It's jumping through the federal hoops that are killing learning and teaching and innovation.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:52 PM   #29
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:52 PM   #30
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 06:41 AM
I hate trying to quote multiple posts.
martha is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 03:03 PM   #31
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha
Did you get your promotion making these kinds of assumptions?
No I got my promossion by busting my ass for kids.


[Q]This is the major thing wrong with both NCLB and the non-teachers who love it: The insistance that teachers work for free. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "teamwork" and everything to do with underfunded federal mandates. This unpaid work is unfair to the teachers AND to administrators. [/Q]

They would disagree with you. I have actually battled them for doing too much. THe first three day weekend I would not open the building, they got upset with me.


[Q]Dread, you know as well as I do that all education is local.

What works for your students may not work for my students, and reducing students to a plie of DATA isn't serving anyone. It's jumping through the federal hoops that are killing learning and teaching and innovation. [/B][/Q]

My staff would argue that DATA should be used to measure learning. They would argue that too long eduaction has focused on the teaching, verses student learning. They would argue that if you measure the learning, evaluate the learning, and use the data to drive instruction. This prinicpal has nothing to do with your location or mine. The results of the data may indicate one thing to you because of your demographics, and something else to my staff. The main idea is that they are constantly evaluating learning and changing instruction based on frequent formative assessments more than the summative assessments. If you are not basing instruction on formative results, then u are reducing it to the summative NCLB. So in principal, yes, what may work in your local may not work here....but they would argue firmly with you that DATA about LEARNING has to be the driving force behind what occurs daily in the classroom.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 03:55 PM   #32
New Yorker
 
Sherry Darling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,857
Local Time: 09:41 AM
Dread, accountability does not have to come in the form of numbers. Minds and learning simply are not standard. We need to continue devloping ways of measuring that are more authentic than approaches like NCLB, its various predecessors, or Virginia's SOLs (standards of learning) allow.

A test on math can tell me if kids can add and multiply or even do albegra. It will never be able to tell me if kids have a clue why math matters. Why did people come up with it, anyway? What problems does it solve? We need to create curriculum around AUTHENTIC PROBLEMS and no true/false or mult. choice test for Richmond (or insert your state capital here) will every tell us that.
They simply cannot measure what MATTERS which is critical and creative thinking. And until educational leaders admit this and embrace more authentic means of holding kids and teachers accountable, our dropout rates will remain low and employers will continue to have a point when they bitch that we're sending them folks who can test but can't think.

Our standarized system is the product of a microwave instant culture and is meant to serve the needs of politicians and administrators, not kids.
Sherry Darling is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 04:22 PM   #33
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sherry Darling
Dread, accountability does not have to come in the form of numbers. Minds and learning simply are not standard. We need to continue devloping ways of measuring that are more authentic than approaches like NCLB, its various predecessors, or Virginia's SOLs (standards of learning) allow.
Hence my comment about frequent formative assessment verses a summative standardized test.

Good article on Formative & Summative Assessment:

http://www.nmsa.org/Publications/Web...0/Default.aspx

I fail to see how anything I said means standardized testing is be and end all.

NCLB is about accountability. There should be accountability for a set standard of skills that schools should be held accountable. There should be accountability to the subgroups of students, be they African American, Hispanic, or from a Free and Reduced Lunch population.

If teachers are using frequent formative assessment to drive insturuction, then the NCLB (summative) falls into place.

If you are trying to improve a subgroup - you should be measuring constantly to see if your strategies for reaching the subgroup work. Until your formative assessments indicate learning is happening, staff should constantly be evaluating the methodology of their lessons.

You cannot make the necessary changes using any summative, NCLB test to drive your instructional practices. You can use it to identify areas of weakness, but you have to constantly be working as a staff to see if anything you are doing works.

I would also argue, that the written component of the MCAS test, is more than a standardized multiple choice test. Since every state creates their own assessment for NCLB, I can not say for certain if other states have any kind of authentic assessment the way I feel the MCAS does.

This is why I refer to the NAEP. It is the only common assessment that all of the states are using. It has been used for more than thirty years, and is an excellent measure of how we are doing nationwide.

Interestingly enough, many of the southern states have shown growth and improvement over the last three years in the area of instructing Free and Reduces Lunch populations.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 04:24 PM   #34
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sherry Darling

They simply cannot measure what MATTERS which is critical and creative thinking. And until educational leaders admit this and embrace more authentic means of holding kids and teachers accountable, our dropout rates will remain low and employers will continue to have a point when they bitch that we're sending them folks who can test but can't think.
I believe this can be measured. There are plenty of open response measures that can be used to measure application of concepts.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 04:25 PM   #35
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sherry Darling
Our standarized system is the product of a microwave instant culture and is meant to serve the needs of politicians and administrators, not kids.
Well I know how much my opinion was wanted. I complete regret participating in this thread.

I resent any implication that I or any other administrator I work with is not working for the interests of children. That comment, as politely as it was written, is an insult to myself, and everything I work for on a daily basis.

Things were so much better when every teacher was an island, and chose to teach what they wanted without any accountability at all.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 04:27 PM   #36
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
The title of the thread, poverty and education, and the article seem to me to have more to do with private schools for white children, lower scores via NAEP standards, and segregation. Not Pelosi, NCLB ect.
Yes.

Perhaps I shouldn't have posted the second article--I'll admit I tried it partly because the first one seemed to be a total non-conversation-starter, and since everyone always seems to have an opinion on NCLB and the second article seemed to be locating NCLB in the context of the first (hence the bolded quote, which I did not intend as an endorsement of Spellings' preferred solutions), I thought maybe I'd toss that in too and see if it attracted any comment.

I apologize if I created a misleading impression of the kind of discussion I intended to start by doing so. Basically, I was hoping for a discussion of how our public schools can better address the needs of lower-income students. I very much appreciate everyone's comments on that topic so far.

While I understand that standardized test scores have their flaws as a way to measure students' progess towards preparedness for higher education and/or the job market, I'm also concerned that dismissing them altogether winds up being a way of avoiding dealing with the reality that lower-income kids are being left behind, and not getting the best shot they could at being prepared to go where they want to go in life. I appreciate that poor parental support of education and chaotic home environments are major aggravants, and that it's unfair to expect teachers to have magic-bullet "remedies" for those...but I also very much appreciate getting some perspective from teachers as to what the differences they notice are, what they think can be done, and which existing strategies do (and which don't) benefit lower-income students in their experience.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 04:35 PM   #37
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
In my experience with low income students you have to have high expectations for them. You have to assume that READING is not happening at home and provide time for them to read in school. This applies to almost everything they do. If you are doing a project, they must be supported in school to accomplish these tasks, because if they are coming to school without the support of parents at home for projects ect, they will not learn how to do them. Low income students must have the support system of a home from within the school.

In many cases, they suffer from self esteem and confidence issues. The most success I have seen with these children comes from building relationships with them, by providing a safe classroom environment where mistakes can be made without fear. The stability of the environmnet, is cruicial, because very often these children are coming from an environment in which stability is absent outside of school. I would even argue that DISCIPLINE issues arrise as vacations approach for these children, because they know school is the stable place for them and they tend to feel anxiety when they know they will not be there for an extended period of time.

The most success that I (and Mrs. Dread) have seen with these children is with the right teacher, looping with a group of low income students, very often pays dividends with their confidence because they come into the second year, with an established relationship with the teacher and classmates. Reading with the low income students effects EVERYTHING. Key to improving their success is intensive work in the area of vocabulary development. Without it all other subjects are impacted including mathematics.

The nice feature of looping with a group of low income students for two years is it gives them COMMON experiences to refer back to when teaching and building upon prior knowledge.

I have seen title one students move from Warning and Needs improvement to Proficient and Advanced (Some with PERFCT MCAS TESTS) over two years of instruction. Children entering third grade at a 1st grade level in third grade can be brought up to a fifth grade level in two years with the correct practices in place.

If you get them reading reading reading, and their confidence up, by the second year of instruction, results are evident.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 05:02 PM   #38
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 08:41 AM
I would strongly recommend looking at developing a culture of Professional Learning Communities in the school.

Rebecca & Richard Dufor as well as Robert Eaker are leaders in this area.

http://www.allthingsplc.info/

Here are three schools with 75%-100% free and Reduced Lunch

http://www.allthingsplc.info/evidenc...hool/index.php

http://www.allthingsplc.info/evidenc...hool/index.php

http://www.allthingsplc.info/evidenc...hool/index.php

This pretty much sums up what I believe in as an educator:

About PLC
Learn more about the history of PLC.
Professional Learning Community (PLC)

"Educators committed to working collaboratively in ongoing processes of collective inquiry and action research to achieve better results for the students they serve. Professional learning communities operate under the assumption that the key to improved learning for students is continuous job-embedded learning for educators." Learning by Doing (2006)

What Are Professional Learning Communities?
It has been interesting to observe the growing popularity of the term professional learning community. In fact, the term has become so commonplace and has been used so ambiguously to describe virtually any loose coupling of individuals who share a common interest in education that it is in danger of losing all meaning. This lack of precision is an obstacle to implementing PLC concepts because, as Mike Schmoker observes, "clarity precedes competence" (2004, P. 85). Thus, we begin this handbook with an attempt to clarify our meaning of the term. To those familiar with our past work, this step may seem redundant, but we are convinced that redundancy can be a powerful tool in effective communication, and we prefer redundancy to ambiguity.

A Focus on Learning
The very essence of a learning community is a focus on and a commitment to the learning of each student. When a school or district functions as a PLC, educators within the organization embrace high levels of learning for all students as both the reason the organization exists and the fundamental responsibility of those who work within it. In order to achieve this purpose, the members of a PLC create and are guided by a clear and compelling vision of what the organization must become in order to help all students learn. They make collective commitments clarifying what each member will do to create such an organization, and they use results-oriented goals to mark their progress. Members work together to clarify exactly what each student must learn, monitor each student's learning on a timely basis, provide systematic interventions that ensure students receive additional time and support for learning when they struggle, and extend and enrich learning when students have already mastered the intended outcomes.

A corollary assumption is that if the organization is to become more effective in helping all students learn, the adults in the organization must also be continually learning. Therefore, structures are created to ensure staff members engage in job-embedded learning as part of their routine work practices.
There is no ambiguity or hedging regarding this commitment to learning. Whereas many schools operate as if their primary purpose if to ensure that children are taught, PLCs are dedicated to the idea that their organization exists to ensure that all students learn essential knowledge, skills, and dispositions. All the other characteristics of a PLC flow directly from this epic shift in assumptions about the purpose of the school.

A Collaborative Culture with a Focus on Learning for All
A PLC is composed of collaborative teams whose members work interdependently to achieve common goals linked to the purpose of learning for all. The team is the engine that drives the PLC effort and the fundamental building block of the organization. It is difficult to overstate the importance of collaborative teams in the improvement process. It is equally important, however, to emphasize that collaboration does not lead to improved results unless people are focused on the right issues. Collaboration is a means to an end, not the end itself. In many schools, staff members are willing to collaborate on a variety of topics as long as the focus of the conversation stops at their classroom door. In a PLC, collaboration represents a systematic process in which teachers work together interdependently in order to impact their classroom practice in ways that will lead to better results for their students, for their team, and for their school. Therefore their collaboration centers around certain critical questions:
What knowledge, skills, and disposition must each student acquire as a result of this course, grade level, and/or unit of instruction.

What evidence will we gather to monitor student learning on a timely basis
How will we provide students with additional time and support in a timely, directive, and systematic way when they experience difficulty in their learning.
How will we enrich the learning of students who are already proficient.
How can we use our SMART goals and evidence of student learning to inform and improve our practice.

Collective Inquiry Into Best Practice and Current Reality
The teams in a PLC engage in collective inquiry into both best practices in teaching and best practices in learning. They also inquire about their current reality—including their present practices and the levels of achievement of their students. They attempt to arrive at consensus on vital questions by building shared knowledge rather than pooling opinions. They have an acute sense of curiosity and openness to new possibilities.
Collective inquiry enables team members to develop new skills and capabilities that in turn lead to new experiences and awareness. Gradually, this heightened awareness transforms into fundamental shifts in attitudes, beliefs, and habits which, over time, transform the culture of the school.

Working together to build shared knowledge on the best way to achieve goals and meet the needs of clients is exactly what professionals in any field are expected to do, whether it is curing the patient, winning the lawsuit, or helping all students learn. Members of a professional learning community are expected to work and learn together.

Action Orientation: Learning by Doing
Members of PLCs are action oriented: They move quickly to turn aspirations into actions and visions into reality. They understand that the most powerful learning always occurs in a context of taking action, and they value engagement and experience as the most effective teachers. In fact, the very reason that teachers work together in teams and engage in collective inquiry is to serve as catalysts for action.

Members of PLCs recognize that learning by doing develops a deeper and more profound knowledge and greater commitment than learning by reading, listening, planning or thinking. Traditional schools have developed a variety of strategies to resist taking meaningful actions, preferring the comfort of the familiar. Professional learning communities recognize that until members of the organization "do" differently, there is no reason to anticipate different results. They avoid paralysis by analysis and overcome inertia with action.

A Commitment to Continuous Improvement
Inherent to a PLC are a persistent disquiet with the status quo and a constant search for a better way to achieve goals and accomplish the purpose of the organization. Systematic processes engage each member of the organization in an ongoing cycle of:

Gathering evidence of current levels of student learning
Developing strategies and ideas to build on strengths and address weaknesses in that learning
Implementing those strategies and ideas
Analyzing the impact of the changes to discover what was effective and what was not
Applying new knowledge in the next cycle of continuous improvement

The goal is not simply to learn a new strategy, but instead to create conditions for perpetual learning—an environment in which innovation and experimentation are viewed not as tasks to be accomplished or projects to be completed but as ways of conducting day-to-day business, forever. Furthermore, participation in this process is not reserved for those designated as leaders; rather, it is a responsibility of every member of the organization.

Results Orientation
Finally, members of a PLC realize that all of their efforts in these areas—a focus on learning, collaborative teams, collective inquiry, action orientation, and continuous improvement—must be assessed on the basis of results rather than intentions. Unless initiatives are subjected to ongoing assessment on the basis of tangible results, they represent random groping in the dark rather than purposeful improvement. As Peter Senge and colleagues conclude, "The rationale for any strategy for building a learning organization revolves around the premise that such organizations will produce dramatically improved results" (1994, p. 44).
This focus on results leads each team to develop and pursue measurable improvement goals that are aligned to school and district goals for learning. It also drives teams to create a series of common formative assessments that are administered to students multiple times throughout the year to gather ongoing evidence of student learning. Team members review the results from these assessments in an effort to identify and address program concerns (areas of learning where many students are experiencing difficulty). They also examine the results to discover strengths and weaknesses in their individual teaching in order to learn from one another. Most importantly, the assessments are used to identify students who need additional time and support for learning. Frequent common formative assessments represent one of the most powerful tools in the PLC arsenal. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, (2006). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work(TM), pp. 2–4

http://www.allthingsplc.info/about/aboutPLC.php
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 05:14 PM   #39
ONE
love, blood, life
 
indra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,689
Local Time: 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha
And this is why I try to avoid education threads.
Yes. They make me have even less respect for teachers.
indra is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 06:05 PM   #40
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 02:41 PM
I don't think that's fair...While I'd prefer to not have things get vindictive at the expense of a discussion of what works and what doesn't, there are plenty of understandable reasons why dialogue on measuring results and formulating policies to address these issues can cut close to the bone for teachers.
__________________

__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×