ongoing mass shootings thread

[Caleb8844]

Originally Posted by BVS

The first one was referring to ISIS, hence the context of the article posted. The second was the NRA. The context of your post referenced the far right so I assumed you were talking about my American terrorist post. Simple as that.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

It was quoted, but I'm not interested in continuing to push this.

Again, though: should the British government have censored reporting regarding the shooter's exclamations?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[BVS]

Originally Posted by Caleb8844

It was quoted, but I'm not interested in continuing to push this.

Again, though: should the British government have censored reporting regarding the shooter's exclamations?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

I'll be honest, I don't know much about the story, hence why I haven't commented on it. Is the story similar? The pieces I've gathered is that the witness supposedly now redacted his claim that was said? And from what I gathered the claim doesn't really help the Britain First organization does it?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference