Official Campaign 2008 Hot Stove Thread

[Irvine511]

Originally posted by diamond
We're just deciding which of our horses has the best testostorine.

if it's all about testosterone, then you *know* Hillary's going to win. girl's got a pair.

[LarryMullen's POPAngel]

Originally posted by phillyfan26
It's blatantly obvious to me that the Republicans have no hope here. Remember 2004? The only reason Bush was elected was because the Democrats had NOBODY. 2008 is reversed. The Republicans have NOBODY. The winner of the Democratic primaries wins the election. Guaranteed.

This is true on all counts.

Come on, Hil!

[diamond]

strap ons are not real.

dbs

[Irvine511]

Originally posted by diamond
strap ons are not real.

dbs

you know this from experience?

[diamond]

Irv,

On a scale of 1-10 how worked up are you today?


dbs

[phillyfan26]

Originally posted by 2861U2
How can you say that? For quite a while leading up to the election, Kerry was ahead of Bush! Even now, Giuliani and Clinton are basically tied. I could say that the Republican field is pretty impressive and that the Dems have NOBODY.

Exactly. Bush won. That shows how weak the Dems were.

Giuliani is the only viable candidate, but he's way too totalitarianist to win the election.

The Dems absolutely have people. Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Dennis Kucinich, for example.

This is coming from an independent by the way.

[2861U2]

Originally posted by phillyfan26


Exactly. Bush won. That shows how weak the Dems were.

Giuliani is the only viable candidate, but he's way too totalitarianist to win the election.

The Dems absolutely have people. Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Dennis Kucinich, for example.

This is coming from an independent by the way.

I think the people want someone who will protect them, and Giuliani can do that.

The Republicans certainly have people too. Giuliani, McCain (who is definetely the most qualified on either side), and Newt maybe. I don't think Thompson will get the nomination. He'll just add some excitement to the race and hopefully to the party.

Come on. Kucinich? I thought we were talking about people who actually had a chance at being elected.

[LarryMullen's POPAngel]

Originally posted by 2861U2


I think the people want someone who will protect them, and Giuliani can do that.

The Republicans certainly have people too. Giuliani, McCain (who is definetely the most qualified on either side), and Newt maybe. I don't think Thompson will get the nomination. He'll just add some excitement to the race and hopefully to the party.

Come on. Kucinich? I thought we were talking about people who actually had a chance at being elected.

We are - did you see Barack and Hillary's names up there, too?

[phillyfan26]

Originally posted by 2861U2


I think the people want someone who will protect them, and Giuliani can do that.

The Republicans certainly have people too. Giuliani, McCain (who is definetely the most qualified on either side), and Newt maybe. I don't think Thompson will get the nomination. He'll just add some excitement to the race and hopefully to the party.

Come on. Kucinich? I thought we were talking about people who actually had a chance at being elected.

McCain is the only respectable candidate of the Republican bunch, and he's got the chances of Kucinich right now. So, yeah, nobody from the Republicans.

[Infinity]

Originally posted by phillyfan26


McCain is the only respectable candidate of the Republican bunch, and he's got the chances of Kucinich right now. So, yeah, nobody from the Republicans.

I'm a Republican and I must say I have no respect for any of the Republican candidates except Ron Paul. He has the balls to stand up to his own party against the genocide in Iraq and has always been against it, from the very beginning, which is something that Hillary Clinton can't claim.

Ron Paul

[financeguy]

Originally posted by Infinitum98
I'm a Republican and I must say I have no respect for any of the Republican candidates except Ron Paul. He has the balls to stand up to his own party against the genocide in Iraq and has always been against it, from the very beginning, which is something that Hillary Clinton can't claim.

Ron Paul

I agree with you 100%.

[financeguy]

Originally posted by Irvine511
if it's all about testosterone, then you *know* Hillary's going to win. girl's got a pair.

So you're basically implying that Hillary is rather masculine?

If a conservative poster said this on FYM, even in jest, they'd be hung, drawn and quartered.

[Irvine511]

Originally posted by diamond
Irv,

On a scale of 1-10 how worked up are you today?


dbs

when chatting with you, i'm always up.

[diamond]

I knew it..db3

[Irvine511]

Originally posted by phillyfan26


McCain is the only respectable candidate of the Republican bunch

agreed, but that's what 8 years of kissing Bush ass will get you -- no respect at all.

Bush is Midas in reverse, everything he touches turns to shit.

poor McCain. i disagree with him on many things, but it's been sad to see this "maverick" bend over for Bush, and then be unmasked as a washed up old fool.

poor guy. sort of.

[Irvine511]

Originally posted by diamond
I knew it..db3

come on, admit it -- i bring out the bi-curious george in you.

[diamond]

I'm the Man in the Yellow Hat.

dbs

[deep]

Stop tapping your foot at Irvine.

[U2democrat]

[deep]

If you love FREEDOM!!

Light up!!




God Bless the USA.

GOP White House hopeful Fred Thompson puzzled Iowans yesterday by insisting an Al Qaeda smoking ban was one reason freedom-loving Iraqis bolted to the U.S. side.

"They said, 'You gotta quit smoking,'" Thompson explained to a questioner asking about progress in Iraq during a town hall-style meeting.

Thompson said the smoking ban and terror tactics Al Qaeda used to oppress women and intimidate local leaders pushed tribes in western Anbar Province to support U.S. troops.

But Thompson's tale of a smokers' revolt baffled some in the audience of about 150 who came to decide whether the former Tennessee senator is ready for prime time.