U2girl said:One last thing: you can wrap it up all you want, but the fact is whoever strikes first in combat is the attacker, not the defending party.
I suppose you can look at it that way......
Are we still attacking first if the UN authorizes it?
Are we still attacking first when another nation violates a cease fire agreement froma war they started?
Are we still attacking first when more and more evidence from not just the United States indicates that Al-Qaeda is there? That potenitally the terrorists with the Rincin in Europe were trained in Iraq? That Al-Qaeda was receiving Chemical/Biological weapons training in Iraq before 9/11?
Peace