Michael Jackson (UNFIT FATHER)

Dreadsox · 11-19-2002, 04:11 PM

The article and pic says it all!!!!!

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...173859,00.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2493513.stm

Not George Lucas · 11-19-2002, 04:19 PM

Yep! He's a real winner!

Maybe he thought the kid wasn't sexy enough.

Moonlit_Angel · 11-19-2002, 05:15 PM

Oh, how wonderful

.

Michael Jackson...bugs me...I have never really cared for him, both as a musician and as a person.

Angela

LarryMullen's POPAngel · 11-19-2002, 06:48 PM

WTF?!

Well, actually, this doesn't surprise me. He's friggin'

daisybean · 11-19-2002, 08:17 PM

How irresponsible is that? What did he think that the little baby would be able to fly if he slipped out of his grip? He obviously has very rarely held a child. I guess I just don't understand what he was trying to prove with that little stunt...

bonoman · 11-19-2002, 08:41 PM

i'd like to slap him upside the head and ask him what the fuck he's thinking.

He is crazy, history proves this.

Oh and did anyone see about pee wee herman. I guess he was busted for taking pictures of a 14 year old(sex pics). I dont know the details. But we must be more careful on who gets close to children nowadays

cell · 11-20-2002, 12:50 AM

oh my god what the hell is wrong with that man...i feel so bad for his kids.

Angela Harlem · 11-20-2002, 04:20 AM

I'd say what he does to his children borders psychological abuse. That is, if you can believe media reports. I saw a story just a few weeks ago on how it "really is" behind closed doors at his place and it was fairly disturbing reading. For starters, it stated he refuses to touch his children see: his fear of germs and fastidious nature, when they need to be physically near each other they must be cleaned from head to toe, all must wear face masks, he insists the children wear those doll type clothes that they have appeared in in various photos the media has shown, they have dyed hair and what looks like makeup. His minders recently decided the behaviour was too much to witness anymore and took them out for the day. They took the kids swimming. First they had to buy these poor kids swimsuits. They arrived at the water park or swimming pool or whatever it was and the kids just stood on the side and looked at the minders for direction on what to do. The source said it was clear they had no idea how to interact with the other children, what to even do in a pool let alone swim. When they are at home, they aren't allowed to make noise, play as kids, or virtually speak to him without prior arrangments. I dont know how much time they spend with him, or who is in charge of them most of the time, but it sounds like he is involved enough in their lives to make these ridiculous living conditions.

Its hard to know what to believe these days when you put the media and Micheal Jackson together, but its clear there is definately something abnormal about how he treats them. While the picture of him dangling this baby off the balcony makes your blood run cold, and I hope to God this is a one off instance of rampant stupidity, it would be nice to know he has no fear of physical contact with this one. The range for 'normal' is fairly large, but he just fails to fall into any part of it.

daisybean · 11-20-2002, 05:01 AM

Angela that makes me so sad. I could tell from the way he was "holding" the baby that he must not have any type of real contact with his children. Like you said who is to know the difference between truth and media hype. So we really don't know what goes on in that house.....but something just isn't right.

I definately think this is something that child welfare should investigate, just from the one clip. However, that probably won't happen, he's got the money to pay people off.

speedracer · 11-20-2002, 07:33 AM

Early '90s joke:

Q: What's the difference between Neil Armstrong and Michael Jackson?

A: Neil Armstrong walked on the moon.

Michael Jackson had sex with young children.

melon · 11-20-2002, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bonoman
Oh and did anyone see about pee wee herman. I guess he was busted for taking pictures of a 14 year old(sex pics). I dont know the details. But we must be more careful on who gets close to children nowadays

LOL...how rumors do fly. Paul Reubens (a.k.a., Pee Wee) was nailed for some of his "vintage art" photography, which, apparently, was so questionably illegal that the county decided against prosecuting him from the start. The city is the one bringing the case against him. Of course, not to necessarily defend him, who knows what these pictures look like.

Jeffrey Jones is the one in real trouble with the 14 year old and the sex pictures.

Melon

melon · 11-20-2002, 09:19 AM

Does anyone else find it strange that both of Jackson's sons are named "Prince Michael"?

Melon

nbcrusader · 11-20-2002, 10:35 AM

I finally saw the video of the dangling baby incident. What struck me was the way the infant began to struggle (or at least appear to be uncomfortable) when Michael Jackson took the infant from the nanny. It struck me that the child was more comfortable in the arms of the nanny that the arms of the biological father.

Anyone who has children, has been around children or was once a child, could tell that the infant was frightened by the incident.

**KhanadaRhodes** · 11-20-2002, 11:43 AM

even if michael doesn't treat his children as badly as the rumours say, he's crazy enough to not be a great father i'm sure. i hate it that just because he had a fucked up childhood, he's going to ruin it for his children as well. i hope that wasn't the only reason he had kids, was to make sure they didn't have a good childhood either.

11-19-2002, 04:11 PM	#1
Dreadsox ONE love, blood, life Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 10,885 Local Time: 07:32 PM	Michael Jackson (UNFIT FATHER) The article and pic says it all!!!!! http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...173859,00.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2493513.stm __________________

11-19-2002, 04:19 PM	#2
Not George Lucas Acrobat Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: South Bend, IN USA Posts: 399 Local Time: 12:32 AM	Yep! He's a real winner! Maybe he thought the kid wasn't sexy enough. __________________

11-19-2002, 08:17 PM	#5
daisybean Rock n' Roll Doggie FOB Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Born under a bad sign with a blue moon in your eyes Posts: 8,577 Local Time: 07:32 PM	How irresponsible is that? What did he think that the little baby would be able to fly if he slipped out of his grip? He obviously has very rarely held a child. I guess I just don't understand what he was trying to prove with that little stunt... __________________ "....But all I ever hear from you is "

11-20-2002, 04:20 AM	#8
Angela Harlem Jesus Online Join Date: Dec 1969 Location: a glass castle Posts: 30,163 Local Time: 11:32 AM	I'd say what he does to his children borders psychological abuse. That is, if you can believe media reports. I saw a story just a few weeks ago on how it "really is" behind closed doors at his place and it was fairly disturbing reading. For starters, it stated he refuses to touch his children see: his fear of germs and fastidious nature, when they need to be physically near each other they must be cleaned from head to toe, all must wear face masks, he insists the children wear those doll type clothes that they have appeared in in various photos the media has shown, they have dyed hair and what looks like makeup. His minders recently decided the behaviour was too much to witness anymore and took them out for the day. They took the kids swimming. First they had to buy these poor kids swimsuits. They arrived at the water park or swimming pool or whatever it was and the kids just stood on the side and looked at the minders for direction on what to do. The source said it was clear they had no idea how to interact with the other children, what to even do in a pool let alone swim. When they are at home, they aren't allowed to make noise, play as kids, or virtually speak to him without prior arrangments. I dont know how much time they spend with him, or who is in charge of them most of the time, but it sounds like he is involved enough in their lives to make these ridiculous living conditions. Its hard to know what to believe these days when you put the media and Micheal Jackson together, but its clear there is definately something abnormal about how he treats them. While the picture of him dangling this baby off the balcony makes your blood run cold, and I hope to God this is a one off instance of rampant stupidity, it would be nice to know he has no fear of physical contact with this one. The range for 'normal' is fairly large, but he just fails to fall into any part of it. __________________

11-20-2002, 05:01 AM	#9
daisybean Rock n' Roll Doggie FOB Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Born under a bad sign with a blue moon in your eyes Posts: 8,577 Local Time: 07:32 PM	Angela that makes me so sad. I could tell from the way he was "holding" the baby that he must not have any type of real contact with his children. Like you said who is to know the difference between truth and media hype. So we really don't know what goes on in that house.....but something just isn't right. I definately think this is something that child welfare should investigate, just from the one clip. However, that probably won't happen, he's got the money to pay people off. __________________ "....But all I ever hear from you is "

11-19-2002, 05:15 PM	#3
Moonlit_Angel Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo... Posts: 20,682 Local Time: 07:32 PM	Oh, how wonderful . Michael Jackson...bugs me...I have never really cared for him, both as a musician and as a person. Angela

11-19-2002, 06:48 PM	#4
LarryMullen's POPAngel Blue Crack Distributor Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: I'll be up with the sun, I'm not coming down... Posts: 53,698 Local Time: 07:32 PM	WTF?! Well, actually, this doesn't surprise me. He's friggin'

11-19-2002, 08:41 PM	#6
bonoman Refugee Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Edmonton, Canada- Charlestown, Ireland Posts: 1,398 Local Time: 05:32 PM	i'd like to slap him upside the head and ask him what the fuck he's thinking. He is crazy, history proves this. Oh and did anyone see about pee wee herman. I guess he was busted for taking pictures of a 14 year old(sex pics). I dont know the details. But we must be more careful on who gets close to children nowadays

11-20-2002, 12:50 AM	#7
cell Rock n' Roll Doggie VIP PASS Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Disneyland Posts: 5,901 Local Time: 05:32 PM	oh my god what the hell is wrong with that man...i feel so bad for his kids.

11-20-2002, 07:33 AM	#10
speedracer Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 7,604 Local Time: 08:32 PM	Early '90s joke: Q: What's the difference between Neil Armstrong and Michael Jackson? A: Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. Michael Jackson had sex with young children.

11-20-2002, 09:19 AM	#12
melon ONE love, blood, life Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Toronto, Ontario Posts: 11,782 Local Time: 08:32 PM	Does anyone else find it strange that both of Jackson's sons are named "Prince Michael"? Melon

11-20-2002, 10:35 AM	#13
nbcrusader Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Southern California Posts: 22,071 Local Time: 04:32 PM	I finally saw the video of the dangling baby incident. What struck me was the way the infant began to struggle (or at least appear to be uncomfortable) when Michael Jackson took the infant from the nanny. It struck me that the child was more comfortable in the arms of the nanny that the arms of the biological father. Anyone who has children, has been around children or was once a child, could tell that the infant was frightened by the incident.

11-20-2002, 11:43 AM	#14
KhanadaRhodes Paper Gods Forum Administrator Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: a vampire in the limousine Posts: 60,683 Local Time: 06:32 PM	even if michael doesn't treat his children as badly as the rumours say, he's crazy enough to not be a great father i'm sure. i hate it that just because he had a fucked up childhood, he's going to ruin it for his children as well. i hope that wasn't the only reason he had kids, was to make sure they didn't have a good childhood either. __________________ __________________

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode