U2democrat
Blue Crack Addict
That speech was beautiful.
Walking out to Signed Sealed Delivered
Walking out to Signed Sealed Delivered
Infinitum98 said:
Yea, we've already interfered with them. They attacked us, so there is nothing wrong in fighting back (Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda). But why continue to interfere with them in Iraq, Iran, etc.? We don't need to do that.
Dreadsox said:I am stunned. Did I get it wrong? Did McCain hurt Obama?
melon said:
We're talking two tiny states with relatively few delegates. It could theoretically go to anyone in later primaries at this point.
Infinitum98 said:
I know you are a neo-con so hence you are never going to see reality, so that is why I don't want to start a discussion either. But your ignorance and arrogance are one of the stupidest things that i've ever seen.
U2democrat said:Was it all women or mostly older women?
I haven't seen a breakdown of age.
anitram said:
No.
Women hurt Obama.
2861U2 said:the extreme beliefs of Islam that teach hatred, that refuse to allow equality for women and minority opinions.
phanan said:Obama is truly an excellent speaker, no matter what.
melon said:
It is a fairly nice sounding platitude, but isolationism has not suited the U.S. historically. We're stuck in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" kind of scenario. "Damned" if we do get involved in global conflicts, because then we're interpreted as the "world police"; "damned" if we don't, because then we're seen as being self-centered, irresponsible global citizens. How many in the anti-war crowd wanted the U.S. to get involved in Darfur, Sudan?
I'm not here to defend Iraq, which was, in hindsight, an ideologically driven escapade given false justification after the fact (as anyone having studied PNAC can attest to). But one colossal mistake (Iraq) should not automatically lead to the other extreme of isolationism.
melon said:
Replace "Islam" with the "American Religious Right," and you get an equally interesting statement.
Infinitum98 said:
Yea, we've already interfered with them. They attacked us, so there is nothing wrong in fighting back (Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda). But why continue to interfere with them in Iraq, Iran, etc.? We don't need to do that.
Dreadsox said:
THat may be true however, the pollsters projected that independent voters would be heading his way hurting McCain.
If it reached 50 - 50 split - that made the difference.
Dalton said:
My question addresses the technical aspect of the caucus system.
VintagePunk said:
I believe the number of delegates reflects the "to date" totals, so, NH and Iowa both, that's why Obama has more.
2861U2 said:
Well I know you are a Ron Paul supporter, so you'll never see reality either, my friend.
The radical Islamists do not attack us because we have bases in their land. We have bases all over the world. We have bases in Germany, but you don't see them attacking us, do you? They attack us because they follow the extreme beliefs of Islam that teach hatred, that refuse to allow equality for women and minority opinions. They don't just hate Americans. Remember the attacks in England? Scotland?
I won't say anymore about this. But your belief in a "blame America first" mentality is outrageous and you ought to be ashamed of yourself, your candidate, and everyone who thinks like you do.
DaveC said:I can't imagine how an undecided who listens to both Obama and Clinton speak would ever choose to vote for Hillary. He absolutely blows her out of the water.
Infinitum98 said:
And yes I see reality, it is you and your small group that don't see reality.
VintagePunk said:I believe the number of delegates reflects the "to date" totals, so, NH and Iowa both, that's why Obama has more.
Dalton said:
Thank ya kindly, ma'am.