martha
Blue Crack Supplier
But what about the pot-smoking? HUH??????
You should make your money and pay for your own healthcare. Not to be given health care from your tax money.
I think this calls for melon posting that supply side Jesus cartoon...
thank you. it's nice when all the facts are actually presented instead of giving some out of context. four hours from the time you walk in till you walk out isn't really that bad. i've waited nearly that long to be seen in the past, just from me walking in until they finally actually start to look at me.Someone posted about the NHS A&E having a four hour wait. The four hour waiting time is from entry to the A&E to discharge or admittance.
This is a useless road to go down, as loathing goes both ways.
^ Because we're one but we're not the same?
Indeed they do. But you seem to be okay with them as long as they're not government-run.
Unless you want to suggest that private insurers never deny coverage for desired medical treatment.
But you guys love private insurance companies right now, you must defend.No, no, I see it as becoming worse under Obama's plan.
What does this have to do with healthcare or Sean's post?It also appears that he's becoming more and more disingenuous as the days roll on.
<>
The health-care reform proposed by House Democrats, if enacted, would in fact mark a significant change in the federal government's role in the financing of abortions. "It would be a dramatic shift," says Rep. Bart Stupak, a Michigan Democrat who has vowed to oppose the bill because of its impact on abortion. Stupak says dozens of House Democrats may join him in opposing a final health-care compromise unless the abortion language is changed, presenting a clear challenge to Democratic vote counters that could imperil a party-line vote.
deeply offended a key segment of Whole Foods consumer base
...by simply explaining the success the company has had in controlling health care costs and offering that as an alternative to the health care reform now under consideration.
Champions of diversity in all but thought.
because this seems wildly hypocritical.
firstly, i got annoyed at the protesters outside the Whole Foods where i spend far, far too much money. the CEO can think what he wants. i'm still going to buy food there because it's shockingly convenient for me right now, and it is possible to find reasonably priced items.
however, i find your comment disingenuous. if, say, a company dropped it's ad dollars from, say, the Orbitz website because a bunch of Christians got together and boycotted Orbitz for actively courting and supporting the gay community, would you feel the same way? would you be angry at these people for smashing diversity? or would you be applauding their organizational abilities and conviction and using good old fashioned political protest like they did in, you know, Selma?
because this seems wildly hypocritical.
when the left gets organized, they're intolerant (all the whining after the Prop 8 debacle in California). when the right gets organized, they're just being good Americans and exercising their right towildly uninformedfree speech.
On the other hand, I would give considerate thought to boycotting a product of theirs called Same-Sex Marriage Double Banana & Nut Vanilla Custard.
And I've never eaten Domino's Pizza for the same reason. Although I suspect I'm not missing much.
has more to do with our illogical thought processes than reality, sociologists are finding.
I stopped eating Carl's Junior around 25 years ago after I discovered how much money Carl Karcher donated to anti-choice groups.
And that was a huge deal, because that was back when Carl's Junior had good food.
And I've never eaten Domino's Pizza for the same reason. Although I suspect I'm not missing much.
Canadian doughnut mogul Tim Hortons has walked away from a plan to sponsor a Rhode Island event promoting heterosexual marriage after word of the company’s involvement caused an Internet dustup that flooded the Canadian news media.
...
Inundated with criticism, Tim Hortons pulled its sponsorship Monday, announcing on its home page that company does not sponsor events “representing religious groups, political affiliates or lobby groups.”
“It has come to our attention that the Rhode Island event organizer and purpose of the event fall outside of our sponsorship guidelines,” the statement read. “As such, Tim Hortons cannot provide support at the event.”
Our ubiquitous chain of Canadian coffee and donut shops, Tim Hortons, has been expanding into the US. A few weeks back, we read that a store in Rhode Island was sponsoring some local "(heterosexual) marriage day" celebration. I knew when I heard it that once the Canadian head office got wind of it, it'd be stopped, and sure enough it was. They put out a statement saying that while they heavily sponsor lots of local organizations (lots of kids sports, sending kids to camp, etc), they don't sponsor events surrounding religious, political or lobby groups. Yay for corporations doing the right thing! I'm so glad I don't have to boycott them.