Joe Lieberman on "Axis of Evil" - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-13-2002, 02:17 AM   #21
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Well said Bubba!
__________________

STING2 is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 02:21 AM   #22
War Child
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 940
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Only semi-funny, but anyway....

PRESS RELEASE

ANGERED BY SNUBBING, LIBYA, CHINA, SYRIA FORM "AXIS OF JUST AS EVIL"
Cuba, Sudan, Serbia Form "Axis of Somewhat Evil"; Other Nations Start Own
Clubs

Bitter after being snubbed for membership in the "Axis of Evil," Libya, China, and Syria today announced they had formed the "Axis of Just as Evil," which they said would be way eviler than that stupid Iran-Iraq-North Korea axis President Bush warned of his State of the Union address.

Axis of Evil members, however, immediately dismissed the new axis as having, for starters, a really dumb name. "Right. They are Just as Evil... in their dreams!" declared North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. "Everybody knows we're the best evils... best at being evil... we're the best." Diplomats from Syria denied they were jealous over being excluded, although they conceded they did ask if they could join the Axis of Evil.
"They told us it was full," said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. "An Axis can't have more than three countries," explained Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. "This is not my rule, it's tradition. In World War II you had Germany, Italy, and Japan in the evil Axis. So you can only have three. And a secret handshake. Ours is wicked cool."

THE AXIS PANDEMIC

International reaction to Bush's Axis of Evil declaration was swift, as within minutes, France surrendered.
Elsewhere, peer-conscious nations rushed to gain triumvirate status in what became a game of geopolitical chairs.

Cuba, Sudan, and Serbia said they had formed the "Axis of Somewhat Evil", forcing Somalia to join with Uganda and Myanmar in the "Axis of Occasionally Evil", while Bulgaria, Indonesia and Russia established the "Axis of Not So Much Evil Really As Just Generally Disagreeable."

With the criteria suddenly expanded and all the desirable clubs filling up, Sierra Leone, El Salvador, and Rwanda applied to be called the "Axis of Countries That Aren't the Worst But Certainly Won't Be Asked to
Host the Olympics";
Canada, Mexico, and Australia formed the "Axis of Nations That Are Actually Quite Nice But Secretly Have Nasty Thoughts About
America", while Spain, Scotland, and New Zealand established the "Axis of Countries That Be Allowed to Ask Sheep to Wear Lipstick."
"That's not a threat, really, just something we like to do," said Scottish Executive First Minister Jack McConnell.

While wondering if the other nations of the world weren't perhaps making fun of him, a cautious Bush granted approval for most axes, although he rejected the establishment of the "Axis of Countries Whose Names End in
'Guay," accusing one of its members of filing a false application. Officials from Paraguay, Uruguay, and Chadguay denied the charges.

Israel, meanwhile, insisted it didn't want to join any Axis, but privately, world leaders said that's only because no one asked them.

__________________

TylerDurden is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 12:19 AM   #23
War Child
 
CannibalisticArtist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Coast babyeee
Posts: 511
Local Time: 03:17 PM
hahahaha
CannibalisticArtist is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 03:55 AM   #24
War Child
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 560
Local Time: 06:17 PM
Quote:
In this case, I HONESTLY believe we were targeted for doing more-or-less the right things (defending Israel, etc.).
Funding Israel is supporting terrorism.

Ethnic Clensing = Terrorism.

Supplying the forces that actively engage in it = Funding terrorism.

[This message has been edited by DoctorGonzo (edited 02-14-2002).]
DoctorGonzo is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 08:36 AM   #25
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detainee at the training camp for Liberals
Posts: 57
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by DoctorGonzo:
Funding Israel is supporting terrorism.


[This message has been edited by DoctorGonzo (edited 02-14-2002).]
What exactly are you a "doctor" of, the soiling of toiletpaper?


------------------


"The only fitting memorial for those lives that were lost is the idea that the world is forever changed by this moment in time, that it is a better more inclusive place, & that we cut off the OXYGEN SUPPLY to these CRAZY FANATICS!" ~Bono 11/05/01


"So Mr. Bin Laden, I hear you have an intrest in our airplanes...Let me show you this one, we like to call it the B-52
the HORROR is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 08:59 AM   #26
Refugee
 
Klodomir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,198
Local Time: 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by the HORROR:
What exactly are you a "doctor" of, the soiling of toiletpaper?
Master debater at work. Pay attention, kids.
Klodomir is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 10:30 AM   #27
I serve MacPhisto
 
z edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: the HORROR
Posts: 4,022
Local Time: 05:17 PM
FYI kids,
I got this from yesterdays USAToday paper: ( i will just include some of the highlights)

from the article:
AL GORE SIDES WITH BUSH ON 'AXIS OF EVIL' ACCUSATION


"There is value in calling evil by its name"-Gore

He then compared Bush's phrase to Ronald Reagan's calling the former Soviet Union an "evil empire" (sounds familiar U2LA)

" One should never underestimate the power of bold words coming from a president of United States"-Gore

But Gore also said Bush needs to show more respect to Americas allies. He said the administration shows "impatience and disdain toward NATO members. "We cannot bind them to us...if we take them lightly"-Gore

Gore stood with Bush on the need for "a final reckoning" with the government of Iraq, which he called "a virulent threat in a class by itself." Most Democrats, with the exception of Gore's running mate, (Lieberman), have been circumspect about expanding the war to Iraq.

(hmmmmmmm)

Also:

Looking to the future, Gore warned against ignoring terrorisms root causes-poverty, ignorance, and oppression he called "another axis of evil".


-thats all I wanted to take from the article, I admit I agree with Gore, funny his comments sound familiar to Lieberman's. Also kind of funny that ,according to the article, He and Lieberman are taking a different approach than most other Dems. Of course, draw your own conclusion to that.

I personally think he's been reading this forum
z edge is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 10:32 AM   #28
Banned
 
LOVE MUSCLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: my lovenest / in bed with Larry, Bono, Larry, :heart: Adam, Larry, Edge, *swoon* kisses and THUD !!!
Posts: 986
Local Time: 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Klodomir:
[?[/b]
Masterbater at work. Pay attention, kids.[/B][/QUOTE]



------------------
LOVE MUSCLE is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 11:20 AM   #29
War Child
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 560
Local Time: 06:17 PM
Quote:
What exactly are you a "doctor" of, the soiling of toiletpaper?
Stop the ad hominem attacks and either challenge the point I made or say nothing at all.
DoctorGonzo is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 02:53 PM   #30
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detainee at the training camp for Liberals
Posts: 57
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by DoctorGonzo:
Stop the ad hominem attacks and either challenge the point I made or say nothing at all.
YES SIR!
*salutes*

------------------


"The only fitting memorial for those lives that were lost is the idea that the world is forever changed by this moment in time, that it is a better more inclusive place, & that we cut off the OXYGEN SUPPLY to these CRAZY FANATICS!" ~Bono 11/05/01


"So Mr. Bin Laden, I hear you have an intrest in our airplanes...Let me show you this one, we like to call it the B-52
the HORROR is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 09:52 PM   #31
Refugee
 
Achtung Bubba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: One Nation. Under God.
Posts: 1,513
Local Time: 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by DoctorGonzo:
Funding Israel is supporting terrorism.

Ethnic Clensing = Terrorism.

Supplying the forces that actively engage in it = Funding terrorism.

[This message has been edited by DoctorGonzo (edited 02-14-2002).]
So I suppose we should ignore the fact that Palestinian terroris--sorry, "freedom fighters" are targeting such key military targets as dance clubs and bat mizvahs?

I believe the Israeli-Palenstinian question has only two legitimate perspectives: either both countries are engaging in equal acts of brutality, in which case we must pursue a cease-fire and peace talks - or Palestine is much, much worse.

Considering that when Palestinian terrorists attack, they TARGET civilians, I'd say they're the more egregious combatants. And considering that Israel is the only Western democracy in that part of the world, I'd say it's clear that we should be their allies.

(It's also amazing that the "David and Goliath" analogy has been so twisted that the JEWISH state, a state surrounded by Arab nations that want to see it wiped off the face of the earth, is the "Goliath" harrasing the supposedly innocent Arafat. I can see how that mentality can also lead one to believe that the U.S. is causing the deaths of thousands of Iraqi children, but the mentality is still terribly wrong.)

In fact, if you look at the death toll and consider Israel's tiny size and population, they've gone through their own 9/11 - and then some. Month by month, more innocent Israelis are killed by acts of terror. The U.S. has been right to meet our terrorists with overwhelming military force; I think that we shouldn't beg Israel to meet their killers at the negotiation table.
Achtung Bubba is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 10:56 PM   #32
I serve MacPhisto
 
z edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: the HORROR
Posts: 4,022
Local Time: 05:17 PM
A-Bubba speeks for those of who wait

100% Bubba, thanx!
z edge is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 01:54 AM   #33
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Bubba does it again! I was about to get into this and then read Bubba's post. Well Done!
STING2 is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 03:20 AM   #34
Refugee
 
Klodomir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,198
Local Time: 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Achtung Bubba:
Considering that when Palestinian terrorists attack, they TARGET civilians,
Israel just announced a few days ago that they are planning to do this too.
Klodomir is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 10:04 AM   #35
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
80sU2isBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,970
Local Time: 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Klodomir:
Quote:
Originally posted by Achtung Bubba:
Considering that when Palestinian terrorists attack, they TARGET civilians,
Israel just announced a few days ago that they are planning to do this too.
Source, please. I find that EXTREMELY hard to believe.
80sU2isBest is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 10:50 AM   #36
Refugee
 
Klodomir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,198
Local Time: 12:17 AM
CNN.dk
http://www.cnn.dk/verden/artikel:aid=119710/

It says:

Israel is prepared to directly attack civilians in the Palestinian areas that Israel has occupied since 1967.

Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer said Monday during a meeting in the Israeli parliament Knesset that if the Palestinians continue to fire Kassam-2 rockets at Israel, then it is likely that Israel will attack the civilians in the "territories", as Israel calls the occupied areas.

On Sunday the Palestinians fired a so-called Kassam-2 rocket from Gaza and a couple of kilometers into Israel where it impacted on a field without causing any damage. The radical group Hamas produces the rockets.
Klodomir is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 07:34 PM   #37
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Until I see multiple sources saying this, I would say its a misprint or the person was misunderstood or words were taken out of context. There is no logical reason to attack civilians. What purpose would that serve except to sever its ties with the USA completely. It won't happen because it waste resources and ruins the countries international position. It accomplishes nothing too. Just moronic. Which most terrorist are.
STING2 is offline  
Old 02-17-2002, 03:53 AM   #38
War Child
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 560
Local Time: 06:17 PM
Quote:
So I suppose we should ignore the fact that Palestinian terroris--sorry, "freedom fighters" are targeting such key military targets as dance clubs and bat mizvahs?
Nope. That was not my intention at all. But the actions of Palestinian terroris does not exuse the war crimes being comitted by Israel on a daily basis.

Quote:
I believe the Israeli-Palenstinian question has only two legitimate perspectives: either both countries are engaging in equal acts of brutality, in which case we must pursue a cease-fire and peace talks - or Palestine is much, much worse.
I believe it is the former.

Quote:
Considering that when Palestinian terrorists attack, they TARGET civilians, I'd say they're the more egregious combatants. And considering that Israel is the only Western democracy in that part of the world, I'd say it's clear that we should be their allies.
The ratio of Palestinian deaths to Israeli is something like 5 - 10x greater. And make no mistake, Isreael targets civillans, it's a matter of policy. They impose apartheid-like rules on Arabs - hardly a "democracy"

Quote:
(It's also amazing that the "David and Goliath" analogy has been so twisted that the JEWISH state, a state surrounded by Arab nations that want to see it wiped off the face of the earth, is the "Goliath" harrasing the supposedly innocent Arafat.
Israel invaded and sized land in violation of international law and has proceeded to subjugate them at gunpoint.

If Israel wants to be treated better by its neighbors, it has to start thinking of Arabs as humans and not as "cancer" and "lice" as they are refferred to by Israeli leaders who see Jews as the chosen people and Arabs as some sort of sub-human speicies.

You wonder why the Arab nations are so hostile?
Quote:
"Our fathers had reached the frontiers recognized in the partition plan; the Six-Day War generation has managed to reach Suez, Jordan, and the Golan Heights. This is not the end. After the present cease-fire lines, there will be new ones. They will extend beyond Jordan ... to Lebanon and ... to central Syria as well."
-- Moshe Dayan to Zionist youth at a meeting in the Golan Heights July, 1968
Quote:
I can see how that mentality can also lead one to believe that the U.S. is causing the deaths of thousands of Iraqi children, but the mentality is still terribly wrong.)
Israel commits crimes.

Israel is called on it.

Israel refuses to comply with calls by every other nation on the face of the planet sans the U.S to cease it's illegal activities.

The U.S bankrolls their further actions.

In Iraq.........................

Saddam pisses off the U.S

Saddam refuses to do what Washington demands.

Sanctions are imposed on NON WEAPON RELATED ITEMS. You see, it's not the ban on items that are designed for killing that is the problem, but the fact the current sanctions are blocking the importation of anything that is considered "dual use". Anything that could possibly in any way be indirectly used to contribute to the manufacture of weapons. So, hospitals are forced to use gasoline in leiu of antiseptic, they are denied vaccines for common illnesses, the water supply is contaminated because they can't get chlorine, and a simply staggering number of everyday items are banned.

500,000 people have died as a direct result of these sanctions. Most of them children. The sanctions TARGET CIVILLIANS. Everyone knows Saddam can get what he needs, but the civillans don't have the same connections. But the U.S is afraid of losing face, they don't want to admit that they are WRONG. That the sanctions are genocidal.

On 60 Minutes, Madeline Albright was asked if the deaths of 500,000 civillans, mostly children was an acceptable price to pay to oust Saddam.

She said "YES"

In my mind, she is in the same league as Osama Bin Laden. She has the same total disregard for human life as he does and is willing to sacrifice anyone to achieve her goals. And she is not alone. Her attitude is shared by many in the U.S government.

3,000 deliberately targeted innocent people die in the U.S and it is worthy of launching a world-wide war.

500,000 deliberately targeted innocent people die in Iraq and it's an acceptable means of achiving foreign policy goals.

We curse the name of Osama Bin Laden when he does the very things that we dismiss as an everyday means of achiving our goals.

Quote:
In fact, if you look at the death toll and consider Israel's tiny size and population, they've gone through their own 9/11 - and then some. Month by month, more innocent Israelis are killed by acts of terror.
That's too bad, but they have killed far more Palestineans through acts that are just as illegal and immoral as a suicide bombing is.

Quote:
The U.S. has been right to meet our terrorists with overwhelming military force; I think that we shouldn't beg Israel to meet their killers at the negotiation table.
Israel is the invader, Israel is the occpying force using 3 billion dollars in U.S taxpayer funds to commmit crimes. They are so far from inncocent it sickens me. They cannot claim any moral high ground.

Both sides have their share of killers.

The Palestineans need to realize that Israel considers Jews to be the chosen people, to be better than Arabs - they have come out and said it on countless occasions - and that they have a manifest destiny that makes negotiating extremly difficult. And they have to understand that terrorism will get them nowhere.

The Israelis need to understand that the Palestineans have absolutely nothing to lose thanks to them, and if they give them a reason to you know.......want to live they might be more receptive. The fact Ehud Barak said if he were a Palestinian that he would have become a terrorist is a stunning admission of how bad the situation is.

Quote:
There is no logical reason to attack civilians.
Because Israel wants to ethnicly cleanse territory, and terrorizing the current population is the best way to go about that. and the Palestinians see no other option.

Quote:
"... we have no solution, that you shall continue to live like dogs, and whoever wants to can leave -- and we will see where this process leads? In five years we may have 200,000 less people -- and that is a matter of enorous importance."
-- Moshe Dayan encouraging the transfer of Gaza strip refugees to Jordan (from Noam Chomsky's Deterring Democracy, 1992, p.434, quoted in Nur Masalha's A Land Without A People, 1997 p.92).
Quote:
"In strategic terms, the settlements (in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza) are of no importance." What makes them important, he added, was that "they constitute an obstacle, an unsurmountable obstacle to the establishment of an independent Arab State west of the river Jordan."
--Binyamin Begin, (son of the late Menahem Begin and a prominent voice in the Likud party writing in 1991, Quoted on page 159 of Findley's Deliberate Deceptions)
Quote:
"We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country .... expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."
-- Theodore Herzl (from Rafael Patai, Ed. The Complete Diaries of Theodore Herzl, Vol I)
Quote:
[b]"... it is the duty of the [Israeli] leadership to explain to the public a number of truths. One truth is that there is no Zionism, no settlement, and no Jewish state without evacuating Arabs, and without expropriating lands and their fencing off."[b]
-- Yesha'ayahu Ben-Porat, (Yedi'ot Aharonot 07/14/1972) responding to public controversy regarding the Israeli evictions of Palestinians in Rafah, Gaza, in 1972. (Cited in Nur Masalha's "A Land Without A People" 1997, p.98)
Quote:
"We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel.... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours ... When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do will be to scurry around like drugged roaches in a bottle."
-- Israeli Chief of Staff Rafael Eitan (Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 4/13/83, NYTimes 4/14/83)
Quote:
"In our country there is room only for the Jews. We shall say to the Arabs: Get out! If they don't agree, if they resist, we shall drive them out by force."
--Professor Ben-Zion Dinur Israel's First Minister of Education, 1954 from History of the Haganah
Quote:
"I have learned that the state of Israel cannot be ruled in our generation without deceit and adventurism."
-- Moshe Sharett, Israel's first Foreign Minister and later a Prime Minister (p.51 Simha Flapan, "The Birth of Israel", 1987).
Quote:
"Israeli forces occupied [the Golan Heights] during the 1967 war. With its occupation of the Golan Heights, Israel expelled over 120,000 inhabitants - mostly Syrians but also several thousand Palestinian refugees. At the same time, Israel destroyed two cities, 133 villages and 61 farms. After this devastation, only 6,396 inhabitants remained in the six villages left standing. On December 14, 1981, the Israeli Knesset unilaterally annexed the Golan Heights in clear contravention of international law. The UN Security Council subsequently declared the annexation illegal and, to date, not a single state has recognized it. Israel has so far built more than 40 settlements, housing over 15,000 settlers in the Golan Heights."
-- New Yorkers for a Just Middle East Peace (NYJMEP) from a letter dating 08/13/1998 sent to Perry Odak, Chief Executive Officer of Ben and Jerry's, protesting a reported agreement between the popular ice cream company and Eden Springs water company, based on the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.
Quote:
"Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ... politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves... The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. ... Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice."
-- David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky's Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan's "Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.
Some democracy.

If you are a U.S taxpayer, this is what you are paying for. And this is why people hate you.

[This message has been edited by DoctorGonzo (edited 02-17-2002).]
DoctorGonzo is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 12:43 AM   #39
Refugee
 
Achtung Bubba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: One Nation. Under God.
Posts: 1,513
Local Time: 06:17 PM
In Iraq.........................

Saddam pisses off the U.S

Saddam refuses to do what Washington demands.

Sanctions are imposed on NON WEAPON RELATED ITEMS. You see, it's not the ban on items that are designed for killing that is the problem, but the fact the current sanctions are blocking the importation of anything that is considered "dual use". Anything that could possibly in any way be indirectly used to contribute to the manufacture of weapons. So, hospitals are forced to use gasoline in leiu of antiseptic, they are denied vaccines for common illnesses, the water supply is contaminated because they can't get chlorine, and a simply staggering number of everyday items are banned.

500,000 people have died as a direct result of these sanctions. Most of them children. The sanctions TARGET CIVILLIANS. Everyone knows Saddam can get what he needs, but the civillans don't have the same connections. But the U.S is afraid of losing face, they don't want to admit that they are WRONG. That the sanctions are genocidal.

On 60 Minutes, Madeline Albright was asked if the deaths of 500,000 civillans, mostly children was an acceptable price to pay to oust Saddam.

She said "YES"

In my mind, she is in the same league as Osama Bin Laden. She has the same total disregard for human life as he does and is willing to sacrifice anyone to achieve her goals. And she is not alone. Her attitude is shared by many in the U.S government.

3,000 deliberately targeted innocent people die in the U.S and it is worthy of launching a world-wide war.

500,000 deliberately targeted innocent people die in Iraq and it's an acceptable means of achiving foreign policy goals.

We curse the name of Osama Bin Laden when he does the very things that we dismiss as an everyday means of achiving our goals.



I notice three things.

First, I find the terribly predictable implication that Iraq is suffering because of "U.S." sanctions, Hussein refusing to do "what Washington demands." Last time I checked, the sanctions were the doing of the United Nations; if what you say is true, the same U.N. that's bravely condemning Israel for targeting Arab civilians is also causing the deaths of a half-million other Arab civilians.

Second, I notice the utter absense of any blame whatsover on the part of Saddam Hussein for the conditions in Iraq: no mention of the attempts to build weapons of mass destruction, the root cause of the sanctions, many of which do indeed restrict military goods. No word either about the funneling of money earmarked for feeding the people into projects to build these weapons. No mention of the oppression of the Kurds and Shiites, nor the use of chemical weapons on his own people. Compared to the damning comments about the U.S., I'd say that the lack of outrage toward Hussein is either an implict condoning of his actions or the sign of complete and utter denial about them.

Third, there is this comment, which bears repeating still:


3,000 deliberately targeted innocent people die in the U.S and it is worthy of launching a world-wide war.

500,000 deliberately targeted innocent people die in Iraq and it's an acceptable means of achiving foreign policy goals.

We curse the name of Osama Bin Laden when he does the very things that we dismiss as an everyday means of achiving our goals.



I can only infer one thing: that DoctorGonzo honestly believes that the United States and its leaders are in fact FAR WORSE than al Queda and Osama bin Ladin.

In the midst of these accusations, I get the sense that Gonzo feels the U.S. got what it deserved - that justice was served - on September 11th, 2001.

Since that day, I have been accused of going too far in disagreeing with dissenters, of being arrogant, and of calling people names undeserved. In particular, I was criticized for declaring that certain sentiments and statements were anti-American.

I may have been wrong then, though I still stand by a few of my statements; either way, I may have overstepped common courtesy once or twice.

But surely there must be statements that are clearly anti-American. Surely these sentiments exist.

To all who read this I now ask, if DoctorGonzo's comments above are not anti-American, what comments are?

And if these comments are indeed anti-American, how am I wrong to say so?

[This message has been edited by Achtung Bubba (edited 02-17-2002).]
Achtung Bubba is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 12:59 AM   #40
War Child
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 940
Local Time: 11:17 PM
Fuck, alot of people here can't read.
__________________

TylerDurden is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×