Ive come full circle on an issue.

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

diamond

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
May 3, 2002
Messages
12,849
Location
Tempe, Az USA
In the past I gave Jamila and Mrs Springsteen a hard time about wearing bracelets.

I was wrong for that and I apologize to them and others for being careless with their feelings re these issues.

You know the Lance Armstrong type braclets saying we should keep our charitable acts in secret and that and wearing a bracelet only appears as a blow horn to let ppl know what charity you're giving too.

Im referring to these types of bracelets.

The urgency of AIDS RELIEF/DEBT RELIEF in Africa is needed more than we realize here in the civilized world. One third of the Verigo Concert is dedicated to this issue.

I plan to get a little more involved at with that cause.

I will now be sporting one of these at future shows along w me kids:


bigband.jpg




db9
:)
 
Last edited:
<- also needs a one bracelet.

but i do agree with db9 however, re: most bracelet wearers. it always caught me as a horn blower too.
also, armstrong had to work his name into the charity with that clever play on words...horn blowing at its best. /rant.
 
Last edited:
No need to apologize Diamond, I wasn't bothered by it. But nice of you to do so nonetheless :)

I don't have any of those bracelets actually, not even a Lance one. But I did order ten of the One bands. It was just a small thing I thought I could do to help out Bono's cause, it's not a fad thing or whatever for me.

But I found out they have Red Sox bands now too :wink:
 
I cannot wear a bracelet....I am insecure about my sexuality....and besides we are possibly banning them in school since the students have developed a sex act thingie involving the bracelets.
 
My One campaign bracelets shipped a couple days ago. I'll be wearing one and I'll definitely be passing on a few to friends (along with the message, of course).
 
BostonAnne said:
Umm - dreadsox - don't you teach elementary school?

You are fooling yourslef if you think anyone in the 5th or 6th grades are not starting to explore......

and....more importantly.....rules in the handbook.....apply throughout the system......

so the middle and high school kids.......impact the elementary schools....:mad:
 
CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- Orange, red, blue, black -- they're just thin, rubbery bracelets that come in a rainbow of colors, but they're causing quite a stir.

First made popular by Madonna and other pop stars in the 1980s, "jelly bracelets" are making a comeback with teens and some grade-school kids. But this time, there's a twist: In some parts of the U.S., they're calling them "sex bracelets" -- with various colors supposedly representing promises to perform sex acts in a game called "Snap."

As the story goes, break someone's orange bracelet (or purple, in some cases) and you get a kiss. Red, a lap dance. Blue, oral sex. Black, intercourse. And so on.

"They've been selling like crazy," says Andy Ball, a clerk at The Alley, an edgy clothing and accessories store in Chicago. He says he learned about their secret meaning from a group of teens who came into the store about a month ago.

Still, it's unclear whether young people are really following through with the sex acts. And some experts think most youth are hearing about the game from recent news reports, not each other.

Snopes.com, a Web site dedicated to exposing urban legends, has deemed the validity of sex bracelets "undetermined."

"Every now and then, I get a note from kids who say it is true," says Barbara Mikkelson, Snopes.com's co-founder. "But I get a heck of a lot of e-mails from kids who are outraged that adults think they would do this. To them, [the bracelets] are just a fashion statement."

Regardless, a few schools in such states as Illinois, Ohio and Florida have banned the bracelets.

"It's about the disruption of the school day," says Joann Hipsher, principal at one of the schools -- Malabar Middle School in Mansfield, Ohio. She says students were spending too much time "worrying about who had them, who had been snapping them."

Elizabeth Cooke, a fourth-grade teacher in Baltimore County, says she was surprised when a fifth-grader told her the bracelets had "secret meanings -- one being, if someone broke one it meant you have to have sex."

"He told me that he wasn't sure if he wanted to wear them anymore because they were stupid," says Cooke, whose school allows the bracelets as a fashion item, if they cause no distractions.

"In my opinion," she adds, "he shouldn't even be thinking about sex at all."

But in other parts of the country, teens say no one they know calls them "sex bracelets."

"It's kind of outrageous and ridiculous. I think the media is making an issue out of nothing," says Kelly Egarian, a 17-year-old from Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, who serves as a consultant for Teenage Research Unlimited, a suburban Chicago firm that tracks youth trends.

In fact, when the staff at Teenage Research asked its 300-some young consultants nationwide about sex bracelets, they found nothing concrete.

"They knew of a friend who had a friend who had a friend who knew about this," says Michael Wood, the company's vice president. "But no one could point a finger to anyone who was actually doing this."

Other experts who deal with teens and children also believe the so-called trend has been blown out of proportion.

A few doctors who treat children and teens in such states as Connecticut, Minnesota and California had never heard of "sex bracelets."

Meanwhile, Dr. Cynthia Mears, an adolescent medicine specialist at Children's Memorial Hospital in Chicago, says some of her young patients do call the bracelets by that name. But she says the most they might give another teen who broke one would be a hug or a kiss -- not sex.

"When I ask, 'Do you go there?' they just kind of look at me and go 'Nahhh,"' Mears says, noting that her young patients are generally willing to talk about their sexual activity because the conversations are confidential.

Mears is concerned that younger children might hear the sex bracelets lingo and "think it's cool." But regardless of the age, she and other experts say parents shouldn't freak out.

Instead, Dr. Lynn Ponton says the bracelets give parents a chance to talk about sex with their children -- something she says they often avoid or handle awkwardly.

"It offers an opportunity to say 'Hey, what's the bracelet mean? What are other kids wearing? What do you think about that?"' says Ponton, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California at San Francisco and author of the book "The Sex Lives of Teenagers."

But Egarian -- the New Jersey teen -- advises parents to tread carefully.

"If my parents questioned me too much about the bracelets," she says, "I'd probably wear them more."
 
Dreadsox said:


You are fooling yourslef if you think anyone in the 5th or 6th grades are not starting to explore......

and....more importantly.....rules in the handbook.....apply throughout the system......

so the middle and high school kids.......impact the elementary schools....:mad:


i agree. in fact our travelling sex ed mobile at the health department has kids sign a statement stating they are at least 12 years old in order to get free condoms!

:ohmy:
 
Iunderstand that...because the article was written two years ago. The practice has transferred to these according to the health teachers.
 
How can you ban them though? What if kids actually like supporting the cause? If the band says "Doggystyle" on it I'd say you'd have a case. It's not like they're performing sexual acts at school are they? :eyebrow:
 
Back
Top Bottom