It should be a Democratic year...then why this??? - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-18-2008, 09:22 AM   #21
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,720
Local Time: 10:25 AM
i think a lot of people won't vote for Obama because he's black, but they'll never acknowledge that, not even to themselves.

so they search around for reasons not to vote for him that seem detached from race, and put him under a level of scrutiny that they never would another candidate,

so that when they don't vote for him because he's black,

they can say they didn't vote for him not because he's black.
__________________

Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 09:34 AM   #22
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 12:25 AM
Since not voting Obama is now evidence of crypto-racism this election has well and truly jumped the shark.
__________________

A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 09:42 AM   #23
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,720
Local Time: 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_Wanderer View Post
Since not voting Obama is now evidence of crypto-racism this election has well and truly jumped the shark.


that's a bit hysterical.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:07 PM   #24
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
they can say they didn't vote for him not because he's black.
I will admit there are hard core racists that would not vote for any black person ever.

As there are hard core sexists that would not vote for any woman, ever.



Will you admit that there is a good percentage of people that are not voting for Obama, that would have voted for Colin Powell?
deep is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:21 PM   #25
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,720
Local Time: 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
Will you admit that there is a good percentage of people that are not voting for Obama, that would have voted for Colin Powell?

yes, some, but i also think that the same thing would apply -- people would talk themselves into thinking they're voting against the black candidate (or the female candidate) for a variety of reasons other than the race (or gender) of said candidate, but these are rationalizations to live with the racist/sexist impulse that i don't think is even necessarily all that conscious.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:23 PM   #26
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 10:25 AM
You'd also have a good number of people who would/will vote for Obama but would not vote for Colin Powell if given that choice.

Especially today, Powell is really damaged goods. Pity for him.
anitram is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:30 PM   #27
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,720
Local Time: 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
You'd also have a good number of people who would/will vote for Obama but would not vote for Colin Powell if given that choice.

Especially today, Powell is really damaged goods. Pity for him.


thinking about it, sounds like another rationalization -- "see, i'd vote for Colin Powell, just not this Obama fella" ...
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:39 PM   #28
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
You'd also have a good number of people who would/will vote for Obama but would not vote for Colin Powell if given that choice.
and of course those Obama voters that would not vote for Powell are really just racists,
all this other talk , Powell - damaged goods (or let's say these are Obama supporters that would not have voted for Powell in the 90s, because they would have thought he was to Military) just excuses Obama supporters are using to hide their racism.
deep is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:42 PM   #29
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
thinking about it, sounds like another rationalization -- "see, i'd vote for Colin Powell, just not this Obama fella" ...
my friend

your thinking here is not rational


it seems the only way a person is not racist, by your thinking,
is that they must vote for the black person?
deep is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:53 PM   #30
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,720
Local Time: 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
my friend

your thinking here is not rational


it seems the only way a person is not racist, by your thinking,
is that they must vote for the black person?


totally rational, just complex.

as race is.

i'm not offering an answer. i'm not saying that if you don't vote for Obama you're a racist, nor am i saying that if you vote for Obama you're voting out of white guilt.

what i am saying is that race shades our perceptions, sometimes imperceptibly.

and if you're wondering, i think gender is even more complex.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:00 PM   #31
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
mobvok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boom clap
Posts: 4,435
Local Time: 06:25 AM
I don't buy Susan Estrich's argument. Look at recent history- the biggest margin any Presidential candidate can reasonably expect is +10 on election day. What's Obama? RCP has him +4 right now, Fivethirtyeight has +2, and we're still only in mid-July. It's hard to deny that Bush's actions have skewed from traditional conservative rhetoric, whether you think that's an inevitable consequence of electing conservatives is beside the point. I think many conservative-leaning people are looking at McCain and able to justify supporting him despite the last 8 years because he says he'll embrace the conservative principles that Bush pulled away from.
mobvok is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:02 PM   #32
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,739
Local Time: 04:25 PM
Well, there are people with all kinds of rationale why they would not vote for Obama, but for Powell, or not for Powell as well, or who would not vote for Powell, but for Obama, or not for Obama either, that are (un-)consciously racist, and many others with the same variety of rationales who are not in any way racist, not even unconsciously.
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:13 PM   #33
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
totally rational, just complex.

as race is.

i'm not offering an answer. i'm not saying that if you don't vote for Obama you're a racist, nor am i saying that if you vote for Obama you're voting out of white guilt.

what i am saying is that race shades our perceptions, sometimes imperceptibly.

and if you're wondering, i think gender is even more complex.
it seems like we go back and forth on this

I have always said bias exist, and I believe that blatant bias is the less problematic because it is obvious.

Show me a person without any bias,

and I will show you a dead person

and yes, there are crazy racists that are agitated by Obama's rise.


These same people were probably right there spreading the swift boat lies against John Kerry. They are all part of the same pool. imo

It would be a more interesting conversation if we had two very similar candidates, with the exception of just race.


that clearly is not the case in this contest.

we have one of the least experienced candidates, in Obama

there are only 2, I would say that were less qualified

I considered W to be unqualified in 2000, even though he claimed executive experience as a Governor.
Ross Perot, was the least qualified person I can recall to get any real serious consideration.
deep is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:17 PM   #34
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,720
Local Time: 10:25 AM
if experience is all that matters,

then Rumsfeld and Cheney are your guys.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 02:59 PM   #35
you are what you is
 
Salome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 22,054
Local Time: 04:25 PM
to be honest
here in The Netherlands the coverage of the Hillary - Obama race was probably something like 0.05% of what it was in the US
and I'm already sick of both of them

I think Obama would already do better by getting no media coverage for a bit

otherwise I agree mobvok
it doesn't make sense expecting landslide victories
__________________
“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.”
~Frank Zappa
Salome is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 04:32 PM   #36
Refugee
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,943
Local Time: 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
You'd also have a good number of people who would/will vote for Obama but would not vote for Colin Powell if given that choice.

Especially today, Powell is really damaged goods. Pity for him.
I certainly have not seen any evidence of that, although he would not be able to win by the margins he could of won by in 1996.
Strongbow is offline  
Old 07-20-2008, 07:41 PM   #37
Refugee
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,455
Local Time: 09:25 AM
What's with many American's obsession with "experiance" - isn't it "experiance" that got you into Vietnam and Iraq. Maybe it's high time for someone with little or no "experiance". Something a bit more refreshing.
Harry Vest is offline  
Old 07-20-2008, 07:54 PM   #38
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,739
Local Time: 04:25 PM
Well, deep's argument probably would then be that the Americans already did the experiment with the refreshing, unexperienced President eight years ago.
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 12:57 AM   #39
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,892
Local Time: 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Vega View Post
Well, deep's argument probably would then be that the Americans already did the experiment with the refreshing, unexperienced President eight years ago.

Truth be told, I can see why Deep worries about the experience issue. I never realized how much damage a truly bad president could do until Bush. So I can see how he'd be very worried about putting yet another person who is essentially unknown and untested back in office. Better the devil you know, then a maybe angel/maybe devil you don't.

For me, though I think Bush's disastorous administration had less to do with his lack of experience and more to do with with his lack of judgement and his willingness to heed the advice of people in his adminstration (who incidentally were VERY experienced) who had what basically added up to bad ideology. I've always liked the way Obama thinks--far more than his much vaunted charisma. I could never have said that about Bush. From what I've learned about Obama's thought processes and approaches to the issues, I feel comfortable with him being our president, his lack of experience not withstanding.
maycocksean is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 03:34 AM   #40
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,739
Local Time: 04:25 PM
That's right, and that is something I often miss when the experience gets discussed. Suddenly, all focus is on only that single aspect and Bush and Obama get compared as if there was nothing else. Bush had little experience and was a bad President, Obama has little experience, ergo we can make the case he will be like Bush, when in fact that is about all they have in similarities.
That Obama seems to get a grasp on what he is talking about, seems way more knowledgeable and open-minded and gives confidence to hear everybody out sometimes gets entirely ignored. No, it's Obama the inexperienced, look at Bush.
__________________

Vincent Vega is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×