Is Palin failin' ? or OMG McCain wins with Palin !! pt. 2

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
When did Nancy supposedly say this, before she spoke?

Palin is less far right than Reagan.

And Ron Jr's whole agenda and bias is trying to make a case for Obama, whom he supports.

Ronald Reagan would never support Obama - Biden.
 
Daily Kos: Palin banning books

This is the list of books Palin tried to have banned. As many of you will notice it is a hit parade for book burners.

A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle
Annie on My Mind by Nancy Garden
As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner
Blubber by Judy Blume
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson
Canterbury Tales by Chaucer
Carrie by Stephen King
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller
Christine by Stephen King
Confessions by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Cujo by Stephen King
Curses, Hexes, and Spells by Daniel Cohen
Daddy’s Roommate by Michael Willhoite
Day No Pigs Would Die by Robert Peck
Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
Decameron by Boccaccio
East of Eden by John Steinbeck
Fallen Angels by Walter Myers
Fanny Hill (Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure) by John Cleland
Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes
Forever by Judy Blume
Grendel by John Champlin Gardner
Halloween ABC by Eve Merriam
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Prizoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. Rowling
Have to Go by Robert Munsch
Heather Has Two Mommies by Leslea Newman
How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell
Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
Impressions edited by Jack Booth
In the Night Kitchen by Maurice Sendak
It’s Okay if You Don’t Love Me by Norma Klein
James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl
Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence
Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman
Little Red Riding Hood by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm
Lord of the Flies by William Golding
Love is One of the Choices by Norma Klein
Lysistrata by Aristophanes
More Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz
My Brother Sam Is Dead by James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier
My House by Nikki Giovanni
My Friend Flicka by Mary O’Hara
Night Chills by Dean Koontz
Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
On My Honor by Marion Dane Bauer
One Day in The Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn
One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey
One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Ordinary People by Judith Guest
Our Bodies, Ourselves by Boston Women’s Health Collective
Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy
Revolting Rhymes by Roald Dahl
Scary Stories 3: More Tales to Chill Your Bones by Alvin Schwartz
Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz
Separate Peace by John Knowles
Silas Marner by George Eliot
Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain
The Bastard by John Jakes
The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier
The Color Purple by Alice Walker
The Devil’s Alternative by Frederick Forsyth
The Figure in the Shadows by John Bellairs
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck
The Great Gilly Hopkins by Katherine Paterson
The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood
The Headless Cupid by Zilpha Snyder
The Learning Tree by Gordon Parks
The Living Bible by William C. Bower
The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare
The New Teenage Body Book by Kathy McCoy and Charles Wibbelsman
The Pigman by Paul Zindel
The Seduction of Peter S. by Lawrence Sanders
The Shining by Stephen King
The Witches by Roald Dahl
The Witches of Worm by Zilpha Snyder
Then Again, Maybe I Won’t by Judy Blume
To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee
Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare
Witches, Pumpkins, and Grinning Ghosts: The Story of the Halloween Symbols by Edna Barth
______________________
obama2br9.gif
 
I love lists of books people want banned. Those are always the first ones I want to read. :D

While I'd love to be outraged over Sarah Palin wanting to ban these books, I can't find any proof that she actually ever did want the books you listed banned. What I found when I checked your link was someone citing a NYT article. Here is a section of that article:

Shortly after becoming mayor, former city officials and Wasilla residents said, Ms. Palin approached the town librarian about the possibility of banning some books, though she never followed through and it was unclear which books or passages were in question.

Anne Kilkenny, a Democrat who said she attended every City Council meeting in Ms. Palin’s first year in office, said Ms. Palin brought up the idea of banning some books at one meeting. “They were somehow morally or socially objectionable to her,” Ms. Kilkenny said.

The librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, pledged to “resist all efforts at censorship,” Ms. Kilkenny recalled. Ms. Palin fired Ms. Emmons shortly after taking office but changed course after residents made a strong show of support. Ms. Emmons, who left her job and Wasilla a couple of years later, declined to comment for this article.

In 1996, Ms. Palin suggested to the local paper, The Frontiersman, that the conversations about banning books were “rhetorical.”

link

She does seem to like to fire anyone who she perceives as crossing her though. I think those around her would do well to never turn their back on her.
 
Some citizen in Wasilla said she tried to have the librarian fired when she was mayor for refusing to ban certain books.
 
Appalachian Pennsyltucky Hillary voters are apparently not impressed?

Trish Heckman, a 49-year-old restaurant cook and disappointed Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter, watched last week as the country's newest political star made her explosive debut.

...

"I wanted Hillary to win so bad, but I saw Sarah, and it just didn't work for me," said Heckman, taking a break in the empty courtyard of J. Paul's restaurant in a downtown struggling to revive. "I have no retirement. Obama understands it's the economy. He knows how we live."

Heckman, like many others in this former coal-mining town at the western foot of the Appalachians, is the type of voter that both presidential campaigns will target in the final two months. Polls show that working-class women have emerged as one of the most critical categories of swing voters at a time when McCain and Barack Obama have galvanized their party bases but still need more votes to win.

...

But now, after a chaotic introductory week that sparked national debates on McCain's judgment, Palin's experience and even her teenage daughter's pregnancy, the initial signs are not entirely positive for the reinvigorated Republican ticket.

Interviews with some two dozen women here after Palin's convention speech found that these voters were not swayed by the fiery dramatic speeches or compelling personal biographies that marked both the Republican and Democratic conventions. Instead, they were thinking about the price of milk -- nearly $5 a gallon -- or the healthcare coverage that many working families here cannot afford.

Even if they admire Palin's attempt to juggle political ambition, an infant son with Down syndrome and a pregnant unwed daughter, these women say that maternal grit is not enough to win their votes.

...

Waitress Judy Artice, "Miss Judy," as she is known at Glisan's roadside diner, declared Palin "the perfect candidate" after watching her Wednesday speech. That said, Artice had already decided that her vote would go to the first candidate who mentioned gasoline prices.

"And -- I'll be danged -- it was Obama," Artice, 46, said between servings of liver and onions during the lunch rush.

...

Uniontown was very much in the McCain campaign's sights throughout a convention that showcased Palin's small-town roots while portraying Obama, who lives in Chicago, as a big-city elitist.

Republican delegates and activists in the convention hall delighted in Palin's jabs at the Illinois senator, such as when she poked fun at the columned backdrop for Obama's stadium acceptance speech or mocked him as intent on "turning back the waters and healing the planet."

For many women here watching closely, though, that portion of Palin's speech was all they needed to hear.

When Palin belittled Obama's history as a community organizer on Chicago's South Side -- suggesting he was a do-little activist while she, as the former mayor of tiny Wasilla, Alaska, had "actual responsibilities" -- Sandy Ryan, 59, clicked the remote.

"That's enough of that. I switched over to 'House Hunters,' " she said with some disgust over dessert with a group of women from the senior housing complex she manages.

...

Patty Tobal, a 63-year-old retired nurse and lifelong feminist, shut off the TV set and went to bed. The promise of a woman on the ticket had piqued her curiosity, but she found Palin's sarcasm offensive and her priorities out of touch.

"We don't need any more fighting in Washington," Tobal said while having her hair done at a little shop on Route 40, where the customers go longer between appointments in these hard times. "Women are not for women just because they are women. We are intelligent enough to make a conscious decision."

...

But those disenchanted voters could be balanced by newly inspired ones, such as Jennifer Glisan, 23, an emergency medical technician who saves lives every week but cannot afford health insurance. Clinton's gender was enough to awaken her political interest, but Palin's failed to hold it.

"I think Palin is a fake. She will run the economy into the ground," Glisan said after catching glimpses of the vice presidential nominee's speech between emergency calls.

"I have to kill myself every day at work to earn enough to pay for gas to get there. I think Obama is sincere. I think we need a change."

Sarah Palin's appeal to working-class women may be limited - Los Angeles Times

Very interesting article.
 
I've heard more men go gaga about Palin than women. The article reflects the opinions of many of the local women I've talked to.
 
You know, any talk of banning books is unacceptable.



sometimes books need to be banned in order to protect children. there are books that have mature, adult themes regarding sex and sexuality, and they need to be judiciously kept from underaged children who are not at all ready to grapple with their difficult themes. the sexualization of pre-teens and teenagers is a terrible thing, so why make it easier by having a state-funded building house materials that can lead to the sexualization of children and thusly result in unintended but very tangible negative social repercussions.

like teen pregnancy.

please. think of the children.
 
This is the HUGE problem with this election. There have been so many rumors and 1/2 truths spun to make a particular candidate look questionable. There have been some on the side of Obama and a boat load in just over a week about Palin. Thankfully we have 2 months where both tickets will be able to present their case to America and, hopefully, we can all sift through the BS from Kos and the like....as well as on the Conservative side, and make a good decision.

I just hope we,, as Americas, can make our decision base on more than: hating GW Bush, voting for a woman, voting for a black man, buying into liberal rumors, buying into conservative rumors, and any other stupid thing that has noting do to with running our country. However, I have my doubts at least regarding the hated of GW Bush from the left. I'm pretty sure the Obama could be found with a dead hooker in his hotel room and the Bush haters wouldn't bat an eye.
 
This is the HUGE problem with this election. There have been so many rumors and 1/2 truths spun to make a particular candidate look questionable. There have been some on the side of Obama and a boat load in just over a week about Palin. Thankfully we have 2 months where both tickets will be able to present their case to America and, hopefully, we can all sift through the BS from Kos and the like....as well as on the Conservative side, and make a good decision.

I just hope we,, as Americas, can make our decision base on more than: hating GW Bush, voting for a woman, voting for a black man, buying into liberal rumors, buying into conservative rumors, and any other stupid thing that has noting do to with running our country. However, I have my doubts at least regarding the hated of GW Bush from the left. I'm pretty sure the Obama could be found with a dead hooker in his hotel room and not bat an eye.



i totally agree. except for the last part, obvy.

i think Sarah Palin needs to get out there in the media and start talking to people so she can actually address these things.

sadly, she's going to be studying for the next three weeks and will be unavailable to the press ... with the exception, i'm hearing, of People Magazine.
 
i totally agree. except for the last part, obvy.

i think Sarah Palin needs to get out there in the media and start talking to people so she can actually address these things.

sadly, she's going to be studying for the next three weeks and will be unavailable to the press ... with the exception, i'm hearing, of People Magazine.

We'll see what happens with the polls. Zogby now has McCain/Palin up 4%. Depending on where things are tracking, she might get out there with the press sooner than later. They need to take advantage of the boost she has provided. The Left can try to pretend that she is not pulling away Clinton voters, but the fact is, every one that she does pull away, and it is happening, is a vote McCain most likely did not have before. She is making an impact. Its a question of how much of one.

I think the McCain's people will have to be careful with who they talk to. I dont mean looking for pro-Republican media but they need to have discernment to avoid the ones who are clearly in the bag for Obama and are looking to destroy her. She still has to talk to the liberal press IMO. She has to show that she can face them and that she is not what the rumors say she is. That is, if that is the case.
 
This is the HUGE problem with this election. There have been so many rumors and 1/2 truths spun to make a particular candidate look questionable. There have been some on the side of Obama and a boat load in just over a week about Palin. Thankfully we have 2 months where both tickets will be able to present their case to America and, hopefully, we can all sift through the BS from Kos and the like....as well as on the Conservative side, and make a good decision.

I just hope we,, as Americas, can make our decision base on more than: hating GW Bush, voting for a woman, voting for a black man, buying into liberal rumors, buying into conservative rumors, and any other stupid thing that has noting do to with running our country.
This is rather interesting given the ad you posted in the other thread...

That being said I agree for the most part.

However, I have my doubts at least regarding the hated of GW Bush from the left. I'm pretty sure the Obama could be found with a dead hooker in his hotel room and the Bush haters wouldn't bat an eye.

Your hated of anything left of Limbaugh is apparent, but let's not forget your party isn't too crazy about Bush either. Oh you all fake it well and support him but try and distance yourselves from him as much as you can. McCain is having people escorted out of his townhall meetings that have 'McCain = Bush' signs, so we're not the only ones who "hate" Bush.
 
We won't know until tomorrow the full impact of the Republican convention on the race, but already there has been a big bounce for McCain/Palin relative to where they were just prior to the convention or even just before Sarah Palin spoke at the convention on Wendsday.

Obama/Biden got out to a 8 point lead over McCain during their convention, and just before Sarah Palin spoke at the Republican convention the Obama/Biden ticket had a 7 point lead still. As of today, the McCain/Palin ticket is now ahead by 3 points with just 58 days to go until election day in the latest gallup poll.

I believe in this election environment there is a definite ceiling on how many votes the Republicans can potentially get in the popular vote, probably not more than a 3% margin over the Obama ticket if everything went their way. With the Gallup poll already showing the McCain/Palin ticket at that point with one more day needed to determine the full immediate impact of the Republican convention, it appears that McCain has definitely picked the person for VP who will give the ticket its best chance of winning in November. The other competitive contenders, Lieberman, and Ridge probably would not have helped the ticket as much do to the damage they would do to support from the base. Governor Palin appears to have indeed passed the do no harm test and is attracting new people to the ticket. Having Romney or Pawlenty on the ticket clearly would not have generated this type of energy and coverage.

Nearly as many people watched Sarah Palin speak, 37 million as watched Obama speak 38 million. Then the following night, John McCain who is not noted for giving great speaches beat both of them with 39 million.

At this point, Harry Vest conclusions appear to be right on the money. What ever happens in November, the Republicans have probably put up the ticket that would give them their best chance at winning the election.

Even before the convention, John McCain was already beating Obama among men alone by 6 percentage points. John McCain was behind Obama with women by 10 points. With Sarah Palin on the ticket now, Obama's advantage with women should grow smaller, although by how much it will is still a question.




Gallup Daily: McCain Moves Ahead, 48% to 45%
 
This goes back to 1999!

and those books stayed in the library.


We don't know what would have happened if these books were not available to children.


Perhaps, Bristol and young Levi's situation would be different ? :shrug:
 
This is rather interesting given the ad you posted in the other thread...

That being said I agree for the most part.

Your hated of anything left of Limbaugh is apparent, but let's not forget your party isn't too crazy about Bush either. Oh you all fake it well and support him but try and distance yourselves from him as much as you can. McCain is having people escorted out of his townhall meetings that have 'McCain = Bush' signs, so we're not the only ones who "hate" Bush.

With Bush I agree and disagree. I agree that we need to see the war in Iraq through or we are inviting the terrorist to bring the battle to our soil. I agree with the tax cuts which the facts of have been twisted by the left.

On immigration, I disagree with him. I live in Southern California so I see the effects of it more so than many other areas of the country.

I dont agree with every position John McCain but I agree with much of what he, as our President, would have control over. This is what bothers me about a subject like abortion. What gets brought up is the appointment of Justices.....a process that requires congressional approval. A President himself cannot overturn Row V. Wade, yet people will make this a HUGE issue swinging their vote. I have my views on this subject but I am more concerned with national security, the economy, energy....issues that President really effects. I choose to vote on what the President can do, not issues where his effect is minimal at best.
 
What gets brought up is the appointment of Justices.....a process that requires congressional approval. A President himself cannot overturn Row V. Wade, yet people will make this a HUGE issue swinging their vote.

Traditionally, Supreme Court justice appointees are summarily approved, barring exceptional circumstances. Hence, the President is far more important on this issue than Congress.
 
The reality is that Roe v. Wade really can't be overturned without overhauling pretty much the entire American concept of privacy law, which interestingly enough would not be something the right seems interested in.

Further than that, it will not be overturned because this is the right's bread and butter and what would they have to kvetch about then? It's a perfectly divisive issue that they can keep going on and on because the courts will do nothing in the end. It isn't this decision in particular that worries me with a Conservative court - Roberts and Alito especially have shown that it is essentially every other area that they would get their paws into first.

It is unfortunate that the SCOTUS has become a political body in the US. The Canadian Supreme Court is nothing like that. Of course if you read the judgments you can sort the justices into political categories, some more obvious than others (like L'Heureux-Dube, who retired a few years ago). But there is not this prevailing sense in this country that the court lives and dies by our federal elections or that decisions swing like a pendulum out of control based on who is doing the appointing.

Plus, we have 4 female justices (out of 9), including the Chief Justice. Something severely and sorely lacking in the US, a country where more females are getting JDs than males, and the ivy league admissions have pretty much equalized so that factually there is no tangible difference in skill level or ability anymore.
 
Traditionally, Supreme Court justice appointees are summarily approved, barring exceptional circumstances. Hence, the President is far more important on this issue than Congress.

Harriet Myers....the scrutiny of Clarence Thomas? Of Alito?


I completely disagree. If it was that easy to over turn, it would have been done so by now...Reagan, GHW Bush, GW Bush....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom