phillyfan26
Blue Crack Supplier
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Messages
- 30,343
A_Wanderer said:Firstly I do not think that you can point to Baathist Iraq as a model of consensual government, Hussein was long way from being a benign dictator (the opinion polls from Iraqis show that the majority approve that Saddam is removed and that life in Iraq is better without him in power - while at the same time disaproving of US presence in the country and terrorism). The situation that Iraq was in through the 1990's where it was boxed in militarily to enforce a regime of sanctions was bad; it cannot be matched to countries such as Pakistan or China where that program of destruction had been pursued.
As Sting2 would point out the violence in Iraq is concentrated around Baghdad, in the absence of foreign forces most of the country (at least the ethnically seperate parts) can be peaceful). Any policy for withdrawing troops should be matched with one that can achieve a stability in Iraq without a bloodbath - now if that is a referendum on partition, installing a dictator (which wouldn't surprise given the langauge coming from both US parties ) or leaving the Iraqi government to seek regional partners in Iran and Syria that should be the focus of the discussion. But it isn't because Iraqs long term situation is in nobodies political interest because as soon as foreign forces leave it's not their problem or responsibility for what happens.
I completely recognize that Hussein's rule in Iraq was one that resulted in a lot of terrible things. I agree that Hussein did not rule the country well.
But the entire war strategy didn't add up. It was on the basis of Weapons of Mass Destruction, not because he was a cruel dictator. It was on the basis that Hussein was a THREAT TO THE US, not to his people.
What I'm saying is that we can't go in individually and change the Middle East to what we want it to be. Which is what this war ended up doing once the WMD trail went dry. We can't create stability without having a much larger force there. We can't have a much larger force there because we can't use that many resources to stabilize something that isn't a threat to our country.