Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
fair enough.
joyfulgirl said:
And unless that kind of humor is used in a context of commenting about racism, then I can only assume that it reflects how the person really feels, even if they think they're "just joking." Many a truth is spoken in jest. I've seen this in myself as well--I'll make a comment, say I'm just kidding, and then feel really embarrassed by the realization that my subconscious just revealed itself. But when you make your living being that way with no self-analysis behind it, never questioning why you feel a need to always say mean things about others, you have some real problems.
Headache in a Suitcase said:this whole thing really is freedom of speech at it's finest.
Yeah, I already touched on this back on page 2, before the whole thing blew up to the level it's at now, although I didn't put it very well.Irvine511 said:i'm just concerned at the frenzied reaction and the full-throated bellows of condemnation that have been thrown at him, as if saying that we condemn these words somehow makes us, ourselves, less misogynist or racist.
But it almost came across to me like you were blaming the players themselves for the "frenzied reaction"; you kept focusing on their press conference as if they were hysterical overreaction personified, when they were the ones directly called out by the whole affair. The reason I thought they should've spoken out sooner if they were going to do it publically was precisely so that they wouldn't run the risk, once a full-scale media melee ensued, of seeming like they were offering themselves to lend a little added pathos to the drama.If one is carelessly tossing around broad-stroke labels like racist or bigot...I agree, and that can actually be a way of falsely simplifying those issues by making them seem more containable than they really are.
anitram said:
No, it isn't.
I don't understand why so many people here completely miss what freedom of speech encompasses. His freedom of speech is not being infringed by any government action. He is free to speak and say whatever he wants; the fact the corporate world is no longer willing to financially compensate him for it is NOT an infringement of his freedom of speech.
How is this concept so misunderstood??
Headache in a Suitcase said:this whole thing really is freedom of speech at it's finest. the will of the people is speaking. they want to nail imus. so that's what will happen...msnbc went first, dumping the simulcast right before his radiothon for kids with cancer, a classy move by them... cbs will be next. i have no doubt he'll be fired. but that's how it goes... a group complains, the news media gets wind, the public gets in an outroar, sponsors start to bail... just a matter of time before the show is gone for good.
it's exactly what happened to laverne and shirley.
Irvine511 said:
but this was meant to be a comedic segment. the joke wasn't funny, but earnestness isn't funny either.
i hear stuff like this all the time from my mother who's a huge women's college basketball fan. UConn is her beloved team -- my parents have season tickets and they have to bring Kleenex when it's "Senior Night" because my mother cries when the senior girls introduce their parents -- but once in a while she'll say things like, "wow, would not want to come across her in a dark alley." it's a commentary on the toughness of the women and meant to be mildly humorous because, especially for a woman her age, a rough and tumble female athlete was not something she grew up with.
where Imus failed was invoking racist and misogynistic language to make what i think was essentially the same point. my mother would never in her life say "nappy-headed hos."
anitram said:But still, the concept of freedom of speech (as protected by the constitution) is not as you are applying it here. It refers to something entirely different (government infringement). The fact that people are speaking out here and advertisers are pulling out isn't really an example of freedom of speech (as much as a response to market pressure) because again, there is no government action involved.
yolland said:
But it almost came across to me like you were blaming the players themselves for the "frenzied reaction"; you kept focusing on their press conference as if they were hysterical overreaction personified, when they were the ones directly called out by the whole affair. The reason I thought they should've spoken out sooner if they were going to do it publically was precisely so that they wouldn't run the risk, once a full-scale media melee ensued, of seeming like they were offering themselves to lend a little added pathos to the drama.
anitram said:But still, the concept of freedom of speech (as protected by the constitution) is not as you are applying it here. It refers to something entirely different (government infringement). The fact that people are speaking out here and advertisers are pulling out isn't really an example of freedom of speech (as much as a response to market pressure) because again, there is no government action involved.
I just think maybe you are using this phrase in a colloquial context rather than its actual constitutional definition.
Headache in a Suitcase said:all i'm saying is that we, as americans, have a right to say whatever we choose. and everyone else has that same right to not listen and/or not agree, because that freedom to be able to speak without "government infringement" does not come without consequence, and that is on display here... call it what you want.
deep said:
I can get what you are saying, sort of
But please respond to this,
Let's say your mother was on the news,
receiving a "Humanitarian Award"
and you are channel surfing and land on msnbc and Chris Mathews, Keith Oberman, or Don Imus is chuckling and says
"Did you see that "SAGGY ASS WHORE" get that SUCKING award?
WildHoneyAlways said:I'm so glad Snoop cleared all that up for us.
Headache in a Suitcase said:
i'd be shocked, pissed and offended.
and then i'd change the station.
MrsSpringsteen said:"It's a completely different scenario. [Rappers] are not talking about no collegiate basketball girls who have made it to the next level in education and sports. We're talking about ho's that's in the 'hood that ain't doing shit, that's trying to get a nigga for his money. These are two separate things. First of all, we ain't no old-ass white men that sit up on MSNBC going hard on black girls. We are rappers that have these songs coming from our minds and our souls that are relevant to what we feel. I will not let them muthafuckas say we in the same league as him," - Snoop Dogg, on the Imus affair.
deep said:
and that would be the end of it for you?
Would you tell your heart-broken mother to f*ckin get over it?
Irvine511 said:
but Snoop is also removing himself from any responsibility he might have in the presentation of the "ho" stereotype. like it or not, Snoop has helped make that word, and its attendent image, part of the cultural vernacular.
ahem:
Headache in a Suitcase said:
is it the same thing? no, of course not... but it's as close as i can get without actually experiencing it.