humanitarian crisis worries

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

verte76

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
May 22, 2002
Messages
23,331
Location
hoping for changes
Is anyone else worried and sad about the possibility of many lives being lost to disease, injury, hunger, and anything else that kills people who are refugees? I haven't seen any numbers telling me how many refugees there are but there have been reports of people leaving towns that got bombed. These are refugees. The cities of northern Iraq are currently being bombed and it's so dangerous even in Baghdad that the Red Cross had to leave. This is bothering me. I'm afraid that people are going to die because they can't get medicine, food aid, water systems, etc, etc. in there. This will determine how hearts and minds in Iraq react to the chain of events. If we help them, good. If we don't disaster.
 
you might find this worth reading

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/06/weekinreview/06MAAS.html

Food, Too, Can Be a Weapon of the War in Iraq

by Peter Maass

AL KUT, Iraq ? A few days ago I drove with a Marine convoy into the desert north of Nasiriya, heading toward Baghdad. The landscape was as unforgiving as it comes ? parched and barren, like the moon with an atmosphere of dusty oxygen. As we moved forward, mostly through sand but occasionally on an unfinished road that was half-gravel, Iraqis appeared at the convoy's flanks, doing what comes naturally to destitute civilians when well-provisioned men and machines of war rumble by: they were begging.

Every half-mile or so, a few Iraqis appeared like ghosts in the wasteland. Some put their thumbs and forefingers together and brought them to their mouths, the third-world sign language for please-give-me-food. Some rubbed their stomachs. Others tilted their heads back and cupped their hands, as though drinking one of the plastic bottles of Oasis mineral water that are stacked like howitzer shells in the backs of Humvees; they were thirsty, too. The smartest ones waved Iraqi dinars bearing images of Saddam Hussein. Perhaps the marines would extend charity in exchange for a war souvenir.

Many Iraqis were in need of decent food and clean water long before the first cruise missile was fired at Baghdad. But there were many more of them once the war began. Cities and villages have been cut off from fresh supplies, electricity and water pumps.

Civilians are suffering, and a debate has begun about who should control relief efforts. The Pentagon has said it wants to keep control over all humanitarian aid. But relief agencies, like Catholic Relief Services and Oxfam-America, have said they don't want to be part of a military effort, because they must be independent to do their jobs.

But staying independent is a challenge. In war zones, especially, the distribution of aid is an intensely political act, no matter how neutral a group tries to be. In 1994, humanitarian agencies in eastern Zaire found themselves helping not only women and children, but many Hutu men and boys who had participated in the genocide of more than 500,000 Rwandan Tutsis. In 1993 in Somalia, the warlords were able to convince their militias that the American military operation there was not a humanitarian intervention to combat famine but a military invasion; 18 American marines and at least 12 humanitarian workers were killed.

In the early 1990's in Bosnia, I first learned the rub-the-stomach language of want. Food is a military necessity; armies need it, and always get a slice of it, no matter the intentions of the donors. And if civilians can be fed by international aid agencies, well, that's one task a besieged government does not have to handle, and one more reason for it not to be concerned about hungry or thirsty people.

The angels of charity are only human, too. The invasion of Iraq had little support, and outright opposition, from some relief groups. They might not wish to engage in activities that strengthen the American occupation of Iraq; if providing food to areas no longer under Mr. Hussein's control is seen as part of that effort, or helps it by encouraging defections, the angels of mercy might be less aggressive in providing their mercy. But far more important for relief groups is the political bind they are in if they operate under, or are thought to operate under, military control: they may not be allowed to deliver aid to the people they wish to deliver it to, and they may become fair military targets for the other side. Last month, for example, a Red Cross worker in Kandahar, Afghanistan, was shot dead by a suspected group of Taliban.

Violence was a constant hazard for relief workers in Bosnia. Though officials of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees tried to retain their independence, traveling only with escorts from the United Nations peacekeeping force, their convoys were frequently shot at or looted, mostly by Serbs trying to starve Muslims (and occasionally Croats) into submission; drivers and other relief personnel were killed and injured.

In Iraq, Pentagon officials and Lt. Gen. Jay Garner, a retired army officer who is designated to take charge of the postwar reconstruction, do not wish, as the war still rages, to relinquish control of humanitarian operations. But the military, despite what officials in Washington might say, is not configured for or adept at distributing aid.

A few days ago, I rode in the back of a Marine Humvee as it passed through several small towns near the city of Kut, 170 miles south of Baghdad. Civilians along the road were holding out packs of cigarettes, hoping to sell them to nicotine-deprived G.I.'s. The captain in the Humvee explained that his marines were under orders not to engage in commerce with civilians, nor toss them cast-offs from their M.R.E.'s, no matter how friendly the civilians might seem. Doing so would mean civilians would get close to their vehicles, and it's impossible to know the difference between a commerce-savvy civilian and a suicide bomber.

The battalion I have been traveling behind does distribute some humanitarian aid, largely through its civil affairs unit. Often it is given to civilians who have been inconvenienced by tanks and assault vehicles parking in their fields. On Thursday, as I waited on the outskirts of Kut during a battle there, several Iraqi men walked out of the city with yellow humanitarian packets ? M.R.E.'s for civilians ? under their arms.

The art of humanitarianism is to provide aid to the people who genuinely need it, and that's usually women, children and the elderly. The Iraqis with the yellow rations were fighting-age men; it's a good bet they were deserters who were given a thank you meal from the civil affairs contingent at the front, just up the road.

The battalion commander stopped by my S.U.V. recently, and I asked about his unit's humanitarian work. The commander, who is a smart and focused lieutenant colonel, was dispatched to Iraq to kill the bad guys, and he doesn't mind doing so. That's his mission. "Yes, we're giving out humanitarian rations," he told me. "It's kind of the carrot-and-stick approach. No better friend, no better enemy." He does not want to do humanitarian work, he continued. "It's not our job, but we do what is humane and what we can to relieve suffering," he said. "The aid we give out is more of a gesture."

I asked whether he had talked with Iraqis and perhaps shared a meal to find out their needs. He said his civil affairs unit handles those things. He doesn't have time for kebabs. "I don't like eating goat," he said and smiled.

His version of humanitarianism is marching to Baghdad as quickly as possible to get rid of Mr. Hussein. Despite the language in Washington, that's probably the Pentagon's version of humanitarianism, too. And that's why, as the march on Baghdad goes forward, I expect to see more Iraqis begging for water.
 
I was reading about this last night on an aid agency's web site. Damn. I don't like this one bit. I am not anti-military but they do some things better than they do others. Giving out aid is not their forte. Aid workers are trained to do this. Let them do their jobs, for goodness' sakes. I'm writing letters to Congress about this. It might not do anything but heck, I tried.
 
I agree with you, verte. The military aren't trained to give out aid - they aren't trained to ensure that aid goes to those who need it most and not just those strong enough to get to the front of the queue and they aren't trained to recognise what aid is most appropriate for which people. Besides there is also the problem that the military are seen as the aggressors, or as somewhat threatening and this can also cause problems in giving out aid. I think the sooner aid agencies are able to resume their work in Baghdad the better.
 
They don't know how to get information as far as needs are concerned, and this is the basic component of information as per giving out aid is concerned. If you can't even do that you can't do anything else. Get these bureaucrats the hell out of the aid process, they're only screwing it up. Let the aid workers do their jobs. This burns me up. :madspit: :mad: :censored: :censored: :scream: :scream:
 
I just got this from my ISP's headlines. It's not exactly bad news.

LONDON (Reuters) - The British Royal Navy said on Thursday Iraq's deep-water port of Umm Qasr would receive its first merchant ship carrying humanitarian aid on Saturday.

"A ship called the Manar from the United Arab Emirates carrying 700 tons of foodstuff will go in in the next couple of days," Steve Tatham, a Royal Navy spokesman based in Bahrain, told Reuters.

He said the shipment would quickly be followed by two Australian vessels carrying some 28,000 tons of wheat.

The port has been closed to merchant shipping while U.S. and British forces cleared mines from the approaches to the port.


I'm certainly not against them cleaning up the mines. They do need certain security safeguards.
 
ABC News just reported that looters have lotted a local hospital. Taking medical supplies, beds, and other equipment. As a result other hospitals in the area have locked their doors.

We need help in there now.
 
It's a mess. At least the Red Cross is functioning in Baghdad right now. They have the military guarding their buildings and supplies. They need to restore security first. I sure hope they can get this situation under control so they can help the people that need to be helped. This is going to be harder than the military conflict. It's scary. I'm afraid that many people don't know what the heck they're supposed to be doing.
 
I'm very afraid for the people of Iraq. The US television has picked up these wonderful visions of "long live bush" but not the pictures of hospitals across the nation. Again a bloodless bloodbath of Iraqi's. With all the "celebration" food and water have lost their significance to the news media.

My prayer
"Please God let not anymore people die in this war, let us find a way to feed the children, let us get medicine, especially antibiotics in to help all Iraqi's, even soldiers. Let us quit bombing and ask for guidance to help these people.

Now get the freakin water turned back on! How to put a nation on it's knees
 
No joke. They're dangerously low on everything. Yeah, people are dancing on statues and stuff but they don't have enough water or other vital stuff. I'm going to try to figure out how I can help.
 
The military are not really trained to be a police force. They need police or some equivalent thereof. They need to make some changes quick. They need to guard public places like schools and hospitals and business districts as well. The present situation simply isn't tolerable.
 
I'm just watching a press conference with Rumsfeld and he's basically saying that the problem with looting of schools and hospitals and with there being a lack of food and water and healthcare is irrelevant given that the Iraqis have been "liberated".

Nobody's saying these problems mean it would have been better if Saddam stayed in power, we're just concerned for what's happening to the Iraqi people now. Seems that he's unable to understand that. Grrrr. :mad: :censored: :sad: :(
 
I haven't changed my opinion of Rumsfeld, and there's no reason to do that now. The guy is clueless and this problem isn't going to be solved.:madspit: :mad: :censored: :censored: :scream: :scream:
 
Rumsfeld claimed that there isn't really very much looting going on. Apparently it's all the fault of the international media. Apparently they keep showing the same footage of a guy running out of a building with a vase, over and over again. Rumsfeld thinks there can't be that many vases in Iraq.

I've watched the news for a few hours over the last few days and I've seen footage of hospitals being looted, of an air conditioning unit being pulled from the roof of a building, of people running through the streets carrying refridgerators, ovens, furniture and many other things. I've seen a spokesperson for the ICRC say that it's extremely worrying that hospitals and schools are being looted.

So I could say Rumsfeld's claim that it's all been exaggerated by the media is clueless. However, I'm sure he's perfectly well aware of the reality in Iraq, it just wouldn't do to let people know the situation in Iraq is less than ideal.
 
OK, maybe Rumsfeld isn't clueless. But when hospitals and such are getting looted yes, you arrest the looters for committing crimes like robbery, assault, and any other laws they might be breaking. Come on, these things are *not* legal in Iraq. I don't give a damn who the government is. They need a police force. They currently don't have one. Life without the police? In this day and age that's about life without oxygen. Use the military for security until there is an Iraqi police force.
 
Rumsfeld is not clueless, he just doesn't give a shit. He is only concerned with his agenda.
DW TV was interview the head of hte ICRC and he stated Coalition forces shot and killed on of their humanitarian people.
ICRC mourns delegates killed in Iraq and Afghanistan

The ICRC is in mourning at the recent deaths in the field of two of its delegates: Vatche Arslanian, in charge of logistics for the ICRC in Iraq, on 8 April in Baghdad, and Ricardo Mungu?a, a water and habitat engineer, on 27 March in Afhganistan.

This statement is also from ICRC President Jakob Kellenberger
The ICRC urgently appeals to the Coalition forces and all other persons in authority to do everything possible to protect essential infrastructure such as hospitals and water-supply and evacuation systems from looting and destruction. In areas under their control, the Coalition forces have specific responsibilities as Occupying Powers under international humanitarian law. These include taking all measures in their power to restore and maintain, as far as possible, public order and safety by putting a halt to pillage and to violence against civilians and civilian facilities.

Civilian facilities which have been damaged or destroyed must be repaired as soon as possible, in order to ensure that the basic needs of the population can be met. Water and electricity supplies are vital. Medical units and personnel must be protected and their work facilitated, and access to them by all persons in need, whether military or civilian, friend or foe, must be granted. In all circumstances, the Red Cross and Red Crescent emblem must be respected.

To the fullest extent of the means available to them, the occupying forces have a duty to ensure that the population has sufficient supplies in terms of water, food and medical care. As the temporary administrators of the occupied territory, the Occupying Powers must support public services and manage resources primarily in the interests of the population, without discrimination. If the whole or part of the population under occupation is not adequately supplied, the Occupying Powers must allow impartial humanitarian organizations to undertake assistance operations. However, the provision of humanitarian aid in no way relieves the Occupying Powers of their administrator's responsibilities towards the population under occupation.
 
Klaus said:
Seems there is not enough military in the liberated Iraq. So the situation is out of control, lots of robbery and plundering reportet, but i'm unable to verify it - just too much :(
Since the US military entered Baghdad, they have only protected one building: the Ministry of...Oil. Hospitals are being ransacked, doctors and hospital attendants are afraid to go to work, while there are a few thousands of injured people that need to be taken care of. Now people have also robbed the National Museum, stealing or destroying artifacts going back 7,000 years ? predating even Babylon. Great, isn't it.

But I heard Iraqi police and US Marines are working together to put up police patrols, and 1,200 American police and judicial officers are being sent to Iraq. Let's hope this puts an end to the looting and robbing.
 
It figures that they would guard the Ministry of Oil. I'm glad they are sending the police officers, they should be able to help stop this intolerable madness. I don't think Rumsfeld gives a :censored:, either. The politicos only care about their political agenda. I would argue that stopping the looting is even good politics, however. The toleration or ignoring of it is insane. Clean up the mess fast or we'll get blamed for a mess.
 
fucking great...

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/13/i...00&en=38ca7bff5498a8f3&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

Pillagers Strip Iraqi Museum of Its Treasure

By John F. Burns (New York Times)

BAGHDAD, Iraq, April 12 ? The National Museum of Iraq recorded a history of civilizations that began to flourish in the fertile plains of Mesopotamia more than 7,000 years ago. But once American troops entered Baghdad in sufficient force to topple Saddam Hussein's government this week, it took only 48 hours for the museum to be destroyed, with at least 170,000 artifacts carried away by looters.

The full extent of the disaster that befell the museum only came to light today, as the frenzied looting that swept much of the capital over the previous three days began to ebb.

As fires in a dozen government ministries and agencies began to burn out, and as looters tired of pillaging in the 90-degree heat of the Iraqi spring, museum officials reached the hotels where foreign journalists were staying along the eastern bank of the Tigris River. They brought word of what is likely to be reckoned as one of the greatest cultural disasters in recent Middle Eastern history.

A full accounting of what has been lost may take weeks or months. The museum had been closed during much of the 1990's, and like many Iraqi institutions, its operations were cloaked in secrecy under Mr. Hussein.

So what officials told journalists today may have to be adjusted as a fuller picture comes to light. It remains unclear whether some of the museum's priceless gold, silver and copper antiquities, some of its ancient stone and ceramics, and perhaps some of its fabled bronzes and gold-overlaid ivory, had been locked away for safekeeping elsewhere before the looting, or seized for private display in one of Mr. Hussein's myriad palaces.

What was beyond contest today was that the 28 galleries of the museum and vaults with huge steel doors guarding storage chambers that descend floor after floor into unlighted darkness had been completely ransacked.

Officials with crumpled spirits fought back tears and anger at American troops, as they ran down an inventory of the most storied items that they said had been carried away by the thousands of looters who poured into the museum after daybreak on Thursday and remained until dusk on Friday, with only one intervention by American troops, lasting about half an hour, at lunchtime on Thursday.

Nothing remained, museum officials said, at least nothing of real value, from a museum that had been regarded by archaeologists and other specialists as perhaps the richest of all such institutions in the Middle East.

As examples of what was gone, the officials cited a solid gold harp from the Sumerian era, which began about 3360 B.C. and started to crumble about 2000 B.C. Another item on their list of looted antiquities was a sculptured head of a woman from Uruk, one of the great Sumerian cities, dating from about the same era, and a collection of gold necklaces, bracelets and earrings, also from the Sumerian dynasties and also at least 4,000 years old.

But an item-by-item inventory of the most valued pieces carried away by the looters hardly seemed to capture the magnitude of what had occurred. More powerful, in its way, was the action of one museum official in hurrying away through the piles of smashed ceramics and torn books and burned-out torches of rags soaked in gasoline that littered the museum's corridors to find the glossy catalog of an exhibition of "Silk Road Civilizations" that was held in Japan's ancient capital of Nara in 1988.

Turning to 50 pages of items lent by the Iraqi museum for the exhibition, he said that none of the antiquities pictured remained after the looting. They included ancient stone carvings of bulls and kings and princesses; copper shoes and cuneiform tablets; tapestry fragments and ivory figurines of goddesses and women and Nubian porters; friezes of soldiers and ancient seals and tablets on geometry; and ceramic jars and urns and bowls, all dating back at least 2,000 years, some more than 5,000 years.

"All gone, all gone," he said. "All gone in two days."

An Iraqi archaeologist who has participated in the excavation of some of the country's 10,000 sites, Raid Abdul Ridhar Muhammad, said he had gone into the street in the Karkh district, a short distance from the eastern bank of the Tigris, about 1 p.m. on Thursday to find American troops to quell the looting. By that time, he and other museum officials said, the several acres of museum grounds were overrun by thousands of men, women and children, many of them armed with rifles, pistols, axes, knives and clubs, as well as pieces of metal torn from the suspensions of wrecked cars. The crowd was storming out of the complex carrying antiquities on hand carts, bicycles and wheelbarrows and in boxes. Looters stuffed their pockets with smaller items.

Mr. Muhammad said he found an American Abrams tank in Museum Square, about 300 yards away, and that five marines had followed him back into the museum and opened fire above the looters' heads. This drove several thousand of the marauders out of the museum complex in minutes, he said, but when the tank crewmen left about 30 minutes later, the looters returned.

"I asked them to bring their tank inside the museum grounds," he said. "But they refused and left. About half an hour later, the looters were back, and they threatened to kill me, or to tell the Americans that I am a spy for Saddam Hussein's intelligence, so that the Americans would kill me. So I was frightened, and I went home."

Mr. Muhammad spoke with deep bitterness toward the Americans, as have many Iraqis who have watched looting that began with attacks on government agencies and the palaces and villas of Mr. Hussein, his family and his inner circle broaden into a tidal wave of looting that targeted just about every government institution, even ministries dealing with issues like higher education, trade and agriculture, and hospitals.

American troops have intervened only sporadically, as they did on Friday to halt a crowd of men and boys who were raiding an armory at the edge of the Republican Palace presidential compound and taking brand-new Kalashnikov rifles, rocket-propelled grenades and other weapons.

American commanders have said they lack the troops to curb the looting while their focus remains on the battles across Baghdad that are necessary to mop up pockets of resistance from paramilitary troops loyal to Mr. Hussein.

Mr. Muhammad, the archaeologist, directed much of his anger at President Bush. "A country's identity, its value and civilization resides in its history," he said. "If a country's civilization is looted, as ours has been here, its history ends. Please tell this to President Bush. Please remind him that he promised to liberate the Iraqi people, but that this is not a liberation, this is a humiliation."
 
Last edited:
This museum theft is a disaster. It's as bad as the fire in Alexandria, which burned much of the library during the reign of Cleopatra. These artifacts really have no set value. They're priceless and can't be replaced. This is one of the oldest continuous settlements on the planet. I knew all hell was going to break out, what with a war in Mesopotamia. I thought that the museum was going to be bombed. I had no idea it would be ripped off instead. What's next, one of the mosques? Please, no. This sucks. I'm upset. :madspit: :mad: :censored: :censored: :scream: :scream:
 
That is a huge cultural blow, not just for Iraq, but the human race.

Every time I see that clip of Rumsfeld saying that the looting consists of one guy stealing a vase, I feel slimy all over. This man is seriously descending into ridiculous propaganda territory with every passing day.

Then he cracks a joke about "how many vases are there in Iraq anyway?" (paraphrased). Yeah, they had vases there when your ancestors were still clubbing each other over the head in a cave, you ingrate. He makes my blood boil, I readily admit it.
 
Electric Blue said:

Since the US military entered Baghdad, they have only protected one building: the Ministry of...Oil. Hospitals are being ransacked, doctors and hospital attendants are afraid to go to work, while there are a few thousands of injured people that need to be taken care of. Now people have also robbed the National Museum, stealing or destroying artifacts going back 7,000 years ? predating even Babylon. Great, isn't it.

But I heard Iraqi police and US Marines are working together to put up police patrols, and 1,200 American police and judicial officers are being sent to Iraq. Let's hope this puts an end to the looting and robbing.

The US Army is protecting one hospital, a Christian one.
 
anitram said:
Every time I see that clip of Rumsfeld saying that the looting consists of one guy stealing a vase, I feel slimy all over. This man is seriously descending into ridiculous propaganda territory with every passing day.

Then he cracks a joke about "how many vases are there in Iraq anyway?" (paraphrased). Yeah, they had vases there when your ancestors were still clubbing each other over the head in a cave, you ingrate. He makes my blood boil, I readily admit it.

EXACTLY! I was SO angry when I heard that Rumsfeld press conference. How DARE he act as though what's happening in Iraq now either is just being invented by the international media. How DARE he pretend it doesn't matter that hospitals are being looted and that vigilante gangs are going around beating and killing anyone they suspect of having worked for Saddam.

And what's happening with the museum being looted is just disastrous. Iraq was where the first civilisation developed, it's known as "the cradle of civilisation" - the contents of that museum is irreplaceable. It's just horrifying. :(
 
anitram said:
That is a huge cultural blow, not just for Iraq, but the human race.

Every time I see that clip of Rumsfeld saying that the looting consists of one guy stealing a vase, I feel slimy all over. This man is seriously descending into ridiculous propaganda territory with every passing day.

Then he cracks a joke about "how many vases are there in Iraq anyway?" (paraphrased). Yeah, they had vases there when your ancestors were still clubbing each other over the head in a cave, you ingrate. He makes my blood boil, I readily admit it.


I couldn't agree more. They ripped off a Mesopotamian museum, dammit. That's not hype or exaggeration. It's a disaster. I'm quite angry about all of this.:madspit: :mad: :censored: :censored: :scream: :scream:
 
verte76 said:
This museum theft is a disaster. It's as bad as the fire in Alexandria, which burned much of the library during the reign of Cleopatra. These artifacts really have no set value. They're priceless and can't be replaced. This is one of the oldest continuous settlements on the planet. I knew all hell was going to break out, what with a war in Mesopotamia. I thought that the museum was going to be bombed. I had no idea it would be ripped off instead. What's next, one of the mosques? Please, no. This sucks. I'm upset. :madspit: :mad: :censored: :censored: :scream: :scream:

I agree with verte76. The looting of the museum is a real loss to the world, and especially the people of Iraq. Many of these items are from the days when Baghdad was part of the "cradle of civilization" beside the Tigris and Euphates (sp?)
river?these items displayed their rich cultural heritage.

Where will these treasures go now? My guess is the looters will sell them to private collectors for far less than they are worth, and they will be displayed in the homes of the wealthy instead of a place where everyone who visits can enjoy them. If any of these items make their way to auction houses like Sotherby's and Christie's, I hope they are confiscated and returned to their rightful home.
 
Back
Top Bottom