GOP Nominee 2012 - Who Will It Be?, Pt. 3 - Page 41 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-01-2012, 09:47 PM   #801
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 20,715
Local Time: 12:58 PM
Yeah, I just feel the kinds of lives people like myself and my family, and others like ourselves, have lived don't get talked about nearly enough. And usually when they do, we have the "Oh, that's so sad, we should do something" token concern.

Like I said earlier, it's not even that I don't think a lot of people who are well off don't care. I think many do. I don't think Romney's a horrible, evil person who would spit on poor people if he saw them in the street or whatever. I just don't think they get it, and I don't think they fully appreciate sometimes how lucky they are.

I like your story, I think it's pretty inspiring and hopeful . I want to continue to improve my life, too. I'm not expecting or planning on being super rich. All I really want out of life is to be able to not be in debt. A job that I can at least have some guarantee I'll be in for a good while. To go to the doctor/dentist when I need to and be able to pay for it. I want to be able to live in a stable home, where I'm not moving around so much, that is affordable enough for me (and I don't need anything fancy. A modest little home's enough for me, I could buy a little house here in the Midwest for a reasonable price and be happy). I want it so that if I have kids someday, they will not have to worry about where their next meal will come from. I want to feel comfortable enough to be able to pay my bills, and for school, and know that I still have enough left over for other necessities/emergencies or the occasional fun day (and for me, my idea of a splurge is going to a book/music store and spending some money. And perhaps a couple big trips to somewhere I've always wanted to go/do something I've always wanted to do). Help out family and friends, or be able to properly pay them back for any help they've given me as well. Simple stuff like that. I'm really not asking for a ton out of life, I don't think what I am asking for is unreasonable. And I think the same can be said about most others in my shoes.

Thanks for the compliment, too, by the way . It's nice to have someone else here know what I'm trying to say.

Edited to add: Of course Trump would endorse Gingrich. I did say at one point that the two would get on quite well, so it's no surprise to me.

(Now THERE'S the example of rich fat cats that I would consider worthy of serious anger, 'cause I do think they genuinely don't care)
__________________

Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 10:22 PM   #802
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 10:58 AM
__________________

diamond is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 10:27 PM   #803
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,392
Local Time: 01:58 PM


i read this. it's the most misleading headline ever. it's just showing where Obama's approval rating is and isn't above 50%. nothing to do with head-to-head matchups.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 10:32 PM   #804
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,257
Local Time: 11:58 AM
I think he wants in on that moon project. First hotel and casino in space.

So between Newt and Cain and Trump, how many women is that? I can't count that high.

Seriously, this won't affect much. Mitt still wins Nevada and eventually New York, probably the only two states Trump has even a modicum of political influence. Might help Newt bring in some cash, though.
2861U2 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 10:52 PM   #805
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 20,715
Local Time: 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2861U2 View Post
I think he wants in on that moon project. First hotel and casino in space.

So between Newt and Cain and Trump, how many women is that? I can't count that high.
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 06:27 AM   #806
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 10:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
i read this. it's the most misleading headline ever. it's just showing where Obama's approval rating is and isn't above 50%. nothing to do with head-to-head matchups.

reread
it.
get
to
know
mitt.



xxox

<>
diamond is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 07:55 AM   #807
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,170
Local Time: 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post

Really wonderful post, I think that your experience is really common these days and it's the nitty gritty of it that just doesn't get told. It's that sort of struggle that is a good juxtaposition to Mitt Romney's "I didn't make much last year" when he made $370K. Yes, to him it's not much but to almost everyone else, that is a small fortune if made annually. For some, it's a complete life changer.
Yes it's all a matter of perspective, and your entire post shows that you have held onto that perspective.

To me that is a fortune, not even a small fortune. I'll never see it, but in case anyone thinks otherwise I don't begrudge Mitt Romney that one bit. Or anyone else. Don't think he has to share it with me either.

And no, this country is not a meritocracy.

Getting back to the facts about what Mitt said and the safety net. He has said over and over again that he's going to cut taxes and not raise them and that he's going to balance the budget. And not cut defense. So how is he going to do all of that without any cuts to this safety net? Tax increases for the wealthy? Don't think so, and I had to take a second to laugh there.

More and more the middle class is becoming poor, and one paycheck away from crisis poverty. There was just a news article about that recently. So Mitt can talk all he wants about a safety net for the poor, one that is increasingly needed for the middle class. But how on earth is he not going to cut it? Even Obama has had to cut some of the "safety net", including heating assistance. Add on top of it Mitt repealing "Obama care" and you have even more middle class people in poverty. So it all just doesn't add up, sorry. Even aside from the tone deaf nature of his statements.
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 09:43 AM   #808
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,392
Local Time: 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamond View Post
reread
it.
get
to
know
mitt.



xxox

<>



Quote:
Gallup released their annual state-by-state presidential approval numbers yesterday, and the results should have 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue very worried. If President Obama carries only those states where he had a net positive approval rating in 2011 (e.g. Michigan where he is up 48 percent to 44 percent), Obama would lose the 2012 election to the Republican nominee 323 electoral votes to 215.

so you see, that map had nothing to do with Mitt.

hope that helps.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 11:06 AM   #809
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,257
Local Time: 11:58 AM
Apparently the Trump story might be wrong. Look's like Mitt's the guy. I'm okay with that, if for no other reason than that it's an endorsement (and more importantly money) that Gingrich won't get.

Makes sense, I guess. Trump wants to be with a winner. Anything that hurts Newt right now is a good thing, and it's clear that Newt wanted this endorsement badly. But again, I don't think it does anything in terms of changing minds.
2861U2 is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 01:11 PM   #810
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 09:58 AM
yeah,

He would not want to alienate the Mormons,
that is a pretty good pool to pick from for his next wife.
Larry King did pretty well for himself there.
deep is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 03:21 PM   #811
ONE
love, blood, life
 
financeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
Except apparently this line has appeared numerous times in his stump speech.

I have actually seen excerpts from Republican blogs and message boards where the anti-Romney contingent is now saying how this proves that Mormons aren't Christians since no Christian would say something so deeply contrary to Jesus' teachings. These are not criticisms coming from the left.

I just think that it's a tone-deaf statement made by a candidate who is beyond wealthy and already seems out of touch. We live in times where it's just a particularly insensitive thing to say. And as always, it's not what you say as much as how it's perceived. It's pretty clear that this isn't going be perceived well by most.
Well, tone-deaf, he may be, but problem is it's all about optics already, which does not bode well for November.

If Romney's, IMO, completely uncontroversial comments (and for the record I doubt if I'm even in the top 5 income earners of those that posted in this thread, let alone the 1%, and certainly didn't go to a $50k a year college, or ever, in my life, get a job through family connections) create such a reaction, then what happens if he starts tackling really controversial isues such as the pay and entitlements of government workers (and contrary to the impression created by some on the left, some categories of government workers are overpaid and/or underworked). Not all, but some.

The guy actually said that if the safety net for the very poor was broken, he would fix it. He did not in any way throw the poor off the bus or anything like it. Yes, he also said that his main interest was in attracting the votes of the 90% in the middle rather than the very rich or the very poor. So what. Big deal. Unlike the Dems, he is honest enough to admit that people from low income groups, on average don't tend to vote as much as middle class people, so any candidate for election, obviously, is primarily focused on the middle class votes.
financeguy is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 04:00 PM   #812
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by financeguy View Post
Yes, he also said that his main interest was in attracting the votes of the 90% in the middle
Do you think that it's a fair assessment of the current American economic situation to say that 90-95% of Americans are middle class?

Because I think that is a huge problem with his statement (aside from the optics and the amateurish "go to the other party, they care about you" comment).
anitram is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 04:03 PM   #813
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 06:58 PM
According to the Census Bureau, as of September 2011, 15.1% of Americans (46 million) live below the official poverty line ($11,100 for an individual, $22,300 for a family of four). That's the highest number of Americans living in poverty since the Census Bureau started tracking that data 52 years ago. Not to mention how many of those 84.9% "middle" Americans (and I don't know of any economists who define the poverty line as where the "middle class" begins) are all too aware right now that they're just one crisis away from swelling the ranks of the 15.1%. That's an awful lot of people to dismiss as apolitical mooches. Why not grant them the respect of assuming most of them, too, want to hear the case for how and why your economic plan gives them a better chance at a job with a living wage than your opponent's, as well as your reassurances that the safety net will be protected. Shouldn't be that tall of an order. It's hard not to hear in this a reflexive bias on his part that poor people aren't 'good, honest, hardworking Americans' like the middle class are. It's not irrational or superficial to distrust politicians who come across like that, which is why conservative pundits also assailed Romney's comments. One statement isn't going to make or break him, no, but he can't afford to repeatedly say things like that either.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 04:20 PM   #814
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mrs. Garrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: pig farming in Bolivia
Posts: 7,325
Local Time: 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlit_Angel View Post
It's okay . I may be getting a bit heated here, too, so I need to remember to keep my cool as well. When an issue touches people personally, it's tough to not let one's emotions get in the way of everything.

And now I'm rambling. *Shuts up and sits down and lets someone else talk*
Don't worry, i didnt take your words the wrong way and i certainly wasn't heated in my previous post. Just a "friendly" rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
Not one person in here said there was anything wrong with wealth. I have to say you're coming off a little out of touch yourself...
C'mon now, "i'm" out of touch because you disagree with me? Whats that about?

Honestly i just want to see jobs created and people getting back to work. However that happens or whatever it takes, i guess im for it. If Obama can get it done, well, its sure high time he do it. IF he can't then i hope the next guy (Mitt and not Newt) can get it done.

I don't see the poor people opening businesses and creating jobs for others, i think thats part of what Romney was saying perhaps. They will be dependent (hopefully on jobs and not govt assistance or "safety nets") on the middle class and the rich to do this. The rich could probably hire a lot of people if they weren't busy hoarding their money or trying to weather the current economic storm. Everyone is suffering in some way i suppose.

That's my take on what Romney said...


As to what Financeguy said about govt workers, yes, there does need to be some changes. I wont get too much into that here and now, but i work for the DOD and this country is at war. And yet somehow in my office there are a few individuals who don't have enough work to do and earn too much money to sit around and post on facebook all day. I see this everday at work. And then there are people like me, who do the job that 2-4 people previously would have done, im constantly busy and putting out fires and dealing with the latest emergency that seems to pop up every 5 minutes. Rather than freeze our pay for another 3 or 4 years, why not just go on a hiring freeze and stop bringing in the dead weight? Im pretty sure i could make more money managing contracts and purchasing for production in private industry than i do for the govt. But that's not the point.

Personally ive had a strong work ethic since i was a kid, bagging groceries at the supermarket afterschool or mowing lawns in the neighborhood so i could afford a new pair of tennis shoes...or after high school when i joined the Army. Im proud to run circles around some of the dead weight in the DOD. What i don't like is when interacting with some of them it clearly pisses some of them off, because when i need something done "now" or "yesterday" to them that's off-putting....afterall they have much more pressing stuff to do like feed their face all day long and update their facebook status, in between maybe accomplishing 1 or 2 tasks for an 8 hour day. This is whats wrong with the govt, but heck that's another story. And i don't want to get back into rant territory again.
Mrs. Garrison is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 04:29 PM   #815
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mrs. Garrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: pig farming in Bolivia
Posts: 7,325
Local Time: 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yolland View Post
According to the Census Bureau, as of September 2011, 15.1% of Americans (46 million) live below the official poverty line ($11,100 for an individual, $22,300 for a family of four). That's the highest number of Americans living in poverty since the Census Bureau started tracking that data 52 years ago. Not to mention how many of those 84.9% "middle" Americans (and I don't know of any economists who define the poverty line as where the "middle class" begins) are all too aware right now that they're just one crisis away from swelling the ranks of the 15.1%. That's an awful lot of people to dismiss as apolitical mooches. Why not grant them the respect of assuming most of them, too, want to hear the case for how and why your economic plan gives them a better chance at a job with a living wage than your opponent's, as well as your reassurances that the safety net will be protected. Shouldn't be that tall of an order. It's hard not to hear in this a reflexive bias on his part that poor people aren't 'good, honest, hardworking Americans' like the middle class are. It's not irrational or superficial to distrust politicians who come across like that, which is why conservative pundits also assailed Romney's comments. One statement isn't going to make or break him, no, but he can't afford to repeatedly say things like that either.
If this is all true, then shouldn't the focus be on Barrack Obama instead of something Romney said? Obama is the President....what about all of the "HOPE & CHANGE" stuff? I hope this isn't what he meant by that. Either he lied, is in over his head, or just doesn't have a clue how to get the economy going again. He's be in office 3 years now, and he's done some really good things that i pointed out a couple of pages back, but he's also failed in creating jobs as you have pointed out here. Why would anyone vote for this guy again? Unless he's got some trick card up his sleeve, or maybe a real jobs plan (finally) this time, i don't see why he gets another shot come November, barring an economic miracle. And i will be praying for one, mind you, just like i hope i win the lottery.
Mrs. Garrison is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 04:36 PM   #816
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 01:58 PM
^

I think that you think that the President can do a lot more than he actually can. I am not sure when it became commonplace to think that a President creates jobs, for example. I am also not sure what anyone expects with an obstructionist Congress that is interested in nothing but making every policy Obama's Waterloo.

Look, Obama has made some mistakes - the two that I fault the most is not properly reforming the financial system when he had immense popular support to do so (instead he gave Goldman Sachs guys jobs in the administration) and spending too much political capital on a healthcare bill that was mediocre at best.

But to imply that the economy is bad because of him, or that he should be shouldering the burden of a housing bubble that collapsed due to policies that he had nothing to do with and a financial system that went under long before he was even in fedeal politics is very shortsighted and only sets him up for automatic failure.

And no, I don't think that voting for the GOP on some sort of misguided notion that if we only had a GOP House and Senate good things would get done is any sort of a solution. The Bush years of absolutely no meaningful oversight were a good example of why.

Truth be told, there is really no way that anything will get fixed by this election - America is a completely politically divided country of ideologues and until some kind of major third-party shake-up, it will just be business as usual. Everything is politicized - just take a look at your judiciary - short of dictatorships and authoritarian states in the world, you won't find another jurisdiction whose judiciary is politicized to such an extent that you can predict Supreme Court decisions with probably a 99% accuracy. Sad state of affairs all around.
anitram is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 05:15 PM   #817
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,392
Local Time: 01:58 PM
that was a very good post.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 05:29 PM   #818
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Popmartijn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 32,841
Local Time: 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
I think that you think that the President can do a lot more than he actually can. I am not sure when it became commonplace to think that a President creates jobs, for example. I am also not sure what anyone expects with an obstructionist Congress that is interested in nothing but making every policy Obama's Waterloo.
I thought that this was quite an interesting article that appeared in the New Yorker some days ago:
The Obama Memos: How Washington Remade the President : The New Yorker

Quote:
George C. Edwards III, a political scientist at Texas A. & M., who has sparked a quiet revolution in the ways that academics look at Presidential leadership, argues in “The Strategic President” that there are two ways to think about great leaders. The common view is of a leader whom Edwards calls “the director of change,” someone who reshapes public opinion and the political landscape with his charisma and his powers of persuasion. Obama’s many admirers expected him to be just this.

Instead, Obama has turned out to be what Edwards calls “a facilitator of change.” The facilitator is acutely aware of the constraints of public opinion and Congress. He is not foolish enough to believe that one man, even one invested with the powers of the Presidency, can alter the fundamentals of politics. Instead, “facilitators understand the opportunities for change in their environments and fashion strategies and tactics to exploit them.” Directors are more like revolutionaries. Facilitators are more like tacticians. Directors change the system. Facilitators work the system. Obama’s first three years as President are the story of his realization of the limits of his office, his frustration with those constraints, and, ultimately, his education in how to successfully operate within them.
Now I need to find an article I spotted last week that mentioned that under Obama more private sector jobs have been created up to now than under the entire W. Bush presidency.
Popmartijn is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 05:39 PM   #819
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrison View Post
If this is all true, then shouldn't the focus be on Barrack Obama instead of something Romney said? Obama is the President....what about all of the "HOPE & CHANGE" stuff? I hope this isn't what he meant by that. Either he lied, is in over his head, or just doesn't have a clue how to get the economy going again. He's be in office 3 years now, and he's done some really good things that i pointed out a couple of pages back, but he's also failed in creating jobs as you have pointed out here. Why would anyone vote for this guy again? Unless he's got some trick card up his sleeve, or maybe a real jobs plan (finally) this time, i don't see why he gets another shot come November, barring an economic miracle. And i will be praying for one, mind you, just like i hope i win the lottery.
I don't think it takes just four years to fix the clusterfuck we had in the fall of 2008.
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 05:51 PM   #820
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,170
Local Time: 01:58 PM
I don't know why anyone would want Trump's endorsement-least of all Romney. There are already ads saying they both like to fire people.

I think it hurts him, especially with his corporations are people and poverty gaffes.
__________________

MrsSpringsteen is offline  
 

Tags
gop, republican

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×