Gene Simmons: My dog has more rights than most Muslim women

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

U2Kitten

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Jul 28, 2001
Messages
17,927
I heard it on the radio this morning. Gene Simmons is in trouble for making the remark that his dog has more rights than most women in the Muslim world. He said, his dog can walk side by side with him instead of ten steps back, his dog can eat beside him instead of in another room, and his dog can go out in public without covering her face. Now Muslim groups are slamming him and boycotting his records (but as the DJ pointed out, it's not like those people who adhere to those practices make up much of KISS's audience anyway)

Now hold on, before you start slamming him as 'ignorant', think about it. He has a point, even if he used a dog to make it. It bothers me that with all the political correctness and complaints about human rights these days that the way many Muslim women are treated is written off as just part of their culture and religion. All through history, it's been part of someone's culture or religion to opress some group, but it's not considered okay anymore. So why is this?
 
Last edited:
Your question is one that nags at me quite a bit, as I consider myself to be both a feminist and a religious pluralist (to a certain extent, anyway). I understand that Muslim women living in Western countries often insist that head coverings (for example) are self-chosen and they want to wear the veil because they feel they are more comfortable that way. On the other hand, some Muslim women do find it oppressive, and in Western countries they have the freedom to choose against that. Azar Nafisi, for example, who wrote the great book Reading Lolita in Tehran, was expelled from her university for not wearing the veil--not because she is not a devout Muslim, but because she felt that the enforced wearing of the veil had everything to do with politics and nothing to do with Islam.

It's easy for me to say, from my Western perspective, that the treatment of Muslim women is outrageous. I try to be careful of being overly American in my viewpoints on this. Muslim women are not idiots, and the Qu'ran actually provides a number of protections and freedoms explicitly for women. That said, I believe in a humane, universal commitment to, at the very least, political equality. A government, even in a Muslim country, ought to extend the same rights to everyone regardless of gender. If an individual woman chooses to adhere to certain tenets of her faith by keeping her head covered, not voting, whatever, then that's her choice. But her government, I feel, is ethically required to give her a genuine option, and protect women's rights to choose all available options rationally and freely.

Does that make any sense? Basically I feel that whatever Muslim women feel is appropriate must be respected, but that Muslim governments must allow for some growth and change in how Muslim women choose to participate (or not participate) in the world.
 
While they may not be idiots, I have a hard time believing most of them actually don't mind this treatment, and fear of reprisal is behind most of the compliance. In some places, a woman can be severely beaten by her husband or male relative or even legally killed for going against these traditions:|
 
I struggle with this, too, especially after reading "The Princess Trilogy" about women in Saudi Arabia. It's about a Saudi princess who is fighting for rights for women in that country, where they don't have any rights or power. This princess, whom Jean Sasson calls Sultana, doesn't think the problem is Islam, per se; she is a devoted Muslim who talks her husband into going to Mecca on pilgrimage with her, among other things. She thinks it's politics on the part of religious officials who "want to keep women cowering at their feet"; she also blames secular Arab traditions. A particularly ultraconservative and harsh brand of Islam, called Wahhabism after its Sunni reformer-founder in the eighteenth century is practiced in Saudi Arabia, and has been spread by their power structure, which is exclusively male. They've gone into Muslim communities all over spreading this kind of Islam, and it's even in the United States. They also spew total hatred of Shia Muslims. Iran is a Shia Muslim state, and the majority of Muslims in Iraq are Shia. I don't think the problem is Islam itself; it's the damn politics, the tribal structure of Arab politics, which is different. Arab politics is based on their tribal structure. Arabs tend to think of themselves as members of a particular tribe rather than nationals of countries, like Iraq, Jordan, etc, etc, which were created by outsiders in the first place when the Ottoman Empire collapsed. I wish Simmons hadn't made this statement--although it doesn't surprise me, I've never thought of him as a particularly thoughtful person.
 
Last edited:
paxetaurora said:
Basically I feel that whatever Muslim women feel is appropriate must be respected

I essentially agree with this. However, the concept of true consent should be examined (BVS has touched on this in other threads) to understand if the feeling of appropriateness truly comes from the women, or if it comes from husbands, fathers, socitety, etc.
 
I kinda agree with him...I mean some dogs do get treated better than some muslim women..and that's really sad. I think we're all human beings and we all have the right to be treated like one.
 
He'd better watch it, he's an American and a Jew. He might just end up with a fatwa on his head.
 
He said a lot more than the dog comment. I'll have to find the transcript but he also called the Middle East "God's armpit" and made some pretty harsh remarks about Muslims as a whole.
 
Wild Angel said:
He'd better watch it, he's an American and a Jew. He might just end up with a fatwa on his head.


that's the first thing I thought too when I heard he said something. I was a huge Kiss fan for years and part of the reason I was so turned off by them is because I was tired of Gene running his mouth all the time.
 
U2Kitten said:
While they may not be idiots, I have a hard time believing most of them actually don't mind this treatment, and fear of reprisal is behind most of the compliance. In some places, a woman can be severely beaten by her husband or male relative or even legally killed for going against these traditions:|

That's very true.

But I went to University with an Iranian girl, a religious Muslim, who never "covered up" in the West, nor did members of her family, but on vacations back to Tehran, they all did. I remember asking her once about it, and she said, well, that is just for show, when you go out in public, when we were in my grandmother's house, nobody bothered. She said that you have to understand a difference between their country, where you obey in public, and ours where you are essentially free in public.

One thing to note is that it is not just religion, but culture, and culture is something that is deeply ingrained. Who knows how Muslim women will feel in the West after living here for many generations. I don't think it's so easy to just dump everything you've known your whole life.

From a Western POV, where we really put a lot of value on individualism, I can't really conceive of ever wanting to wear a veil over my head. I don't like the idea and I don't see what it has to do with God, but I also don't have the benefit of having been immersed in that specific culture or religion to really understand it.
 
There is a Muslim couple who frequents the same stores as me, and I always see the woman all covered except for her eyes. Honestly, the sight of this person completely robed and covered in flowing black cloth is a shock, and has scared little kids.

I have seen this happen in person. She walks far behind her husband but he makes her do all the work. But he pays, she probably isn't allowed to handle money. Then she carries out the bags. I guess she's never going to Americanize, or maybe he won't let her. They probably talk down us American women behind our backs, coming to the store in shorts alone without a man! I can't understand why people of that culture would even move here in the first place.
 
Last edited:
We had a political dispute here in Alabama over a law that required that hair be shown in all drivers' license photos. The law made it illegal for Muslim women to wear headscarves in their pictures, and also for Catholic nuns who wear habits to wear their headpieces. The local Muslims raised a stink about the law, and some Catholics complained about it also (including yours truly). Finally someone who's not known for liberal views wrote an editorial in our archconservative local paper that the law was repressive and contrary to freedom of religion. A week later the law was abolished and everyone was happy. Many Muslim women who hate veiling do like the headscarf; some of them complain that they feel "naked" without a headscarf. The office manager of a local mosque is a woman. She talked to the press at a Ramadan open house hosted by the mosque. Like anitram said, it's not just religion to them, it's culture.
 
Yes there are a few who have posted in here.

And ladies your status is safe....the clerics have spoken.

[Q]A conservative Iranian cleric has denounced the "moral depravity" of owning a dog, and called for the arrest of all dogs and their owners.
Dogs are considered unclean in Islamic law and the spread of dog ownership in Westernised secular circles in Iran is frowned upon by the religious establishment.

[/Q]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/2326357.stm
 
nbcrusader said:


I essentially agree with this. However, the concept of true consent should be examined (BVS has touched on this in other threads) to understand if the feeling of appropriateness truly comes from the women, or if it comes from husbands, fathers, socitety, etc.

Yes--good clarification. I think you're right about that.
 
Dreadsox said:
Yes there are a few who have posted in here.

And ladies your status is safe....the clerics have spoken.

[Q]A conservative Iranian cleric has denounced the "moral depravity" of owning a dog, and called for the arrest of all dogs and their owners.
Dogs are considered unclean in Islamic law and the spread of dog ownership in Westernised secular circles in Iran is frowned upon by the religious establishment.

[/Q]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/2326357.stm

Man...they're worse than the Mosaic Law after a while. I think it is safe to say that Islam hates everything and everyone. :p

Melon
 
Dreadsox said:
Yes there are a few who have posted in here.

And ladies your status is safe....the clerics have spoken.

[Q]A conservative Iranian cleric has denounced the "moral depravity" of owning a dog, and called for the arrest of all dogs and their owners.
Dogs are considered unclean in Islamic law and the spread of dog ownership in Westernised secular circles in Iran is frowned upon by the religious establishment.

[/Q]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/2326357.stm

:rant: :mad: :down: :censored:

I had heard they felt that way about dogs before but had hoped things had changed. As an animal lover, that makes me sick and angry. :mad:

And I'm still fuming over the woman thing too. Not feeling to0 cool toward that culture :censored:

Originally posted by melon
Man...they're worse than the Mosaic Law after a while. I think it is safe to say that Islam hates everything and everyone. :p

Sure looks that way, doesn't it? Who do they like, only men, but only if they grow a beard and wear their turban in public?:sigh:
 
Last edited:
We also had a flareup here in VA with the driver license thing Verte mentioned in Alabama, only it wasn't the hair, it was the face! They demanded their 'right' to wear their veils over their face in the pictures! The state fought it, saying it was ridiculous, it was a PICTURE ID and we have to see facial features to identify you, not a piece of black cloth! That only makes sense, I mean, you do have to see the person's face to identify them :huh: It's like bank robbers who wear a hankerchief over their face so they won't be recognized. I think it came out that they had to show their face, the one on their head wasn't so much of a problem, it was the face one.

But what I want to know is, if any Islamic woman adheres so strictly to those rules that she demands to keep her face covered, how is she allowed to drive a car in the first place?:confused: I'd think that was against the rules!
 
U2Kitten said:
While they may not be idiots, I have a hard time believing most of them actually don't mind this treatment, and fear of reprisal is behind most of the compliance. In some places, a woman can be severely beaten by her husband or male relative or even legally killed for going against these traditions:|

I agree.
I welcome anyone to yell at me, but I think it is dangerous territory to use the comfort of 'respecting cultures' as a nod of acceptance, while quietly finding it terribly difficult to swallow. Perhaps I am contradicting even myself here, as I like anyone hope to always respect other cultures. Not though, at the price of someone else's freedom. I'd rather be more close minded to culture than quieten the voice inside me which says this is wrong.
 
The law we had the dispute over was strictly a headscarf thing, and didn't deal with veils over the face. You can't see the road if you're wearing a veil, and they use the whole veiling issue to keep women from driving in Saudi Arabia (among other "reasons" why women "shouldn't" drive in that country). The founder of modern Turkey, Ataturk, felt like he had to make Turkey strictly a secular state to give women equal rights. So there are many obstacles between women in many of the Islamic countries and equal rights. Sultana lost one of her best friends to an "honor killing"; the girl was only around men she did not know, and since she was a virgin the father was allowed to dispense "justice" in the matter. They drowned her in the family swimming pool. I cannot imagine living with all of this :censored: in my life. It's truly hellish. Still, especially right now, we should be careful about what we say about Muslims as a whole. I read about a mosque leader in Oregon who's originally from Bangladesh yesterday. He's funny, very low-key, friendly and very forgiving of negative attitudes towards Muslims, and loves his adopted country, the U.S, dearly. He makes all of his decisions with his wife. Just because :censored: is happening in Muslim countries doesn't mean it's OK to make blanket statements about "Muslims". We are in a Muslim nation right now, Iraq, and there has recently been a real PR disaster between us and them, based on culturally sensitive stuff. We don't need to make a bad situation worse.
 
Last edited:
That story of the girl being drowned is terrible :censored: :(

I never meant to make any blanket statements, I always said 'many' and 'some' and I only mean the ones who practice those things. When I started this thread it was out of sympathy for women victimized by those primitive, unjust ways.

I heard a story of a girl being thrown into a well by her father and brother. They said they had to kill her for the honor of their family. That is sad.
 
Last edited:
U2Kitten I understand that you're not making blanket statements. It sounds like Gene Simmons may have, which is unfortunate since he's famous.
 
Thanks Verte :) :hug:

I don't know what else Simmons said, maybe BAW will post it if she finds it.
 
U2Kitten said:


I don't know what else Simmons said, maybe BAW will post it if she finds it.


gene simmons comments


I thought it about this for a while yesterday and felt that since this thread was specifically about his comments relating to women in the Muslim world, posting his other comments might be too off topic and I didn't want to totally derail the thread.

But I guess it can't hurt to post a link to a news story about what he said :shrug:
 
Simmons comments describing Islam as a "vile culture" are disgusting. The question of women's rights in predominantly Muslim countries is an interesting and relevant discussion, but the way Simmons approaches the subject is simply offensive and inflammatory. In any case, the idea of Gene Simmons professing to be a champion of women's rights is frankly laughable.
 
Simmons' remarks are disgusting and ignorant. Since when did he give a damn about women's rights in the first place?
 
Last edited:
U2Kitten said:
Who do they like, only men, but only if they grow a beard and wear their turban in public?:sigh:

You are talking about Sikhs.
 
Back
Top Bottom