Macfistowannabe
Rock n' Roll Doggie Band-aid
Oddly enough, I can agree to that Pax.
Macfistowannabe said:Didn't mean to make anyone barf, basically wanted a few opinions of this guy's main cause - to bring solutions to how homosexuals are treated in schools, from the perspective of someone who's struggled with these kinds of feelings. Somehow, all this ex-gay talk got so political. Yuck.
Macfistowannabe said:I don't ask anyone to agree or even approve to everything he stands for. Basically, I wanted to post an article that wouldn't make the mainstream headlines for whatever reason that would be. We're so used to the same perspective over and over again, why not something a little different? That is the cause.
Thanks Angela, I do think that most of our disagreements on FYM are based on views, rather than facts.Angela Harlem said:I can understand that. I just think most of these, no matter what the perspective, kind of miss the point in some way. It's all just opinion in the end, what we all think here.
Macfistowannabe said:Dreadsox: Clearly since homosexuality is not considered to be a psychological disorder by any credible psychologist, why would I as an educator want to teach a curriculum that would imply there is something wrong with being who they are. Wouldn;t that be doing more harm than good?
APA: Whereas some mental health professionals advocate treatments of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people based on the premise that homosexuality is a mental disorder (e.g., Socarides et al, 1997).
So "credibility" has to come from those who support your views in your case. You did state "clearly it's not a disorder by any CREDIBLE psychologist..." So it still depends on your opinion, or does it?
I was comparing a statement that Dreadsox made - not that I really want to single him/her out - but for clarity's sake, with something the APA said. The two sentences didn't match very well. I do see that it's very difficult for anyone to battle homosexual feelings, but I do think it can be overcome, if they fight their struggles extremely hard.paxetaurora said:I think the APA is pretty damn credible. And I think most people would agree. You're talking an organization led by the most accomplished, schooled, experienced psychologists in the country, and you're not willing to say they're credible? That their credibility is merely an opinion?
If you read my quotations, the APA claimed that some professionals do base it on a mental disorder. You don't exactly have to believe they should do it that way, but my point was that these professional psychologists must seem uncredible in your point of view.Dreadsox said:
Cute.
SO let me understand this....any source I use is biased because it supports my point of view. You ask for sources and I quote them.
Yes, I believe that the American Psychological Association is more credible than the person your article is about.
Macfistowannabe said:If you read my quotations, the APA claimed that some professionals do base it on a mental disorder. You don't exactly have to believe they should do it that way, but my point was that these professional psychologists must seem uncredible in your point of view.
Okay, so if it's not a mental disorder, what is it?Dreadsox said:
And the THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED part is the response of the APA to this.
It would seem to me that the THEREFORE STATEMENT clarifies their belief.
Macfistowannabe said:No I don't, I don't know what to think of it.
Macfistowannabe said:I don't see how anyone can be absolutely sure it's inborne or hereditary, generally speaking. Sure, it's who they're attracted to, but the question I have, is when does this begin? Day 1? 5 years old? 13 years old?
If you read the article again, you will see that he doesn't preach repent or die, he speaks out against that approach.Dreadsox said:
It is not my role as an educator to educate about repent and die, since it mentions that in the originally posted article.
Yes yes, but out of 46 chromosomes, what's the ratio of passing a "gay chromosome?"indra said:
Probably about the same time being heterosexual (I'm assuming you are) began for you. I don't think there's anything intrinsically weird about homosexuality...there are so many differences in each and every person...it's just one of those differences.
Macfistowannabe said:If you read the article again, you will see that he doesn't preach repent or die, he speaks out against that approach.
Macfistowannabe said:Yes yes, but out of 46 chromosomes, what's the ratio of passing a "gay chromosome?"
Macfistowannabe said:This is pretty sad stats though:
One study says the average lifespan of a homosexual is 42 years; another study says 43 percent of male homosexuals reported having more than 500 partners during their lifetime. For the purposes of this article, I don't want to take the time to dissect the research methods that were used to draw these conclusions. I will only say that, while some of the findings in such studies are true, throwing these numbers around while talking to someone who is homosexual will only reinforce, in their minds, the fact that you have stereotyped them. Can you imagine telling your son or daughter that that heterosexual activity is intrinsically wrong because America has a divorce rate estimated at 43 percent, or because three of every ten women killed in the United States die at the hands of a husband or boyfriend?
From http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/135/22.0.html
Macfistowannabe said:I do see that it's very difficult for anyone to battle homosexual feelings, but I do think it can be overcome, if they fight their struggles extremely hard.