A_Wanderer
ONE love, blood, life
Place the argument to the individual
For argument number one we have
A: Noam Chomsky
B: Ted Rall
C: Howard Dean
D: David Duke
E: Lyndon LaRouche
So, match the quote number to the individual you believe would have argued that point, note that two of the quotes will come from the same individual.
How freaking weird is it the way that the far left and the far right have so much in common, bunch of wankers the lot of them.
Answer key below (highlight too read)
1D, 2A, 3D. 4B
For argument number one we have
Coming up next is argument number twoTo end the threat of terrorism against the American people, we must know the true reason why we are so hated. Modern technology makes mass murder and terrorism so ridiculously easy that just about anyone can do it. It cannot be stopped by military might. In fact, even the brute force we are using in Afghanistan supposedly to wipe out terror -- already shows signs of whipping up enough world-wide hatred against America to give rise to a thousand new terrorists for every one terrorist we might kill....
Perhaps we should have enough courage to consider the possible reasons why so many might hate us. Only when we have all the facts, rather than cute little cliches like They were attacking freedom, can we decide the best way we can protect our people in the future.
The real reason we have suffered the terrorism of the WTC attack is shockingly simple.
Too many American politicians have treasonously betrayed the American people by blindly supporting the leading terrorist nation on earth: Israel.
The American mass media and the government cannot have it both ways. If they are motivated to attack Afghanistan for giving aid and comfort to terrorists, then some Palestinians naturally find motivation to attack America for giving aid and even military support to Israel, a nation that has committed unrelenting terrorism against them.
In number three we have this offeringLike others in the region, [Bin Ladin] is also outraged by long-standing US support for Israel's brutal military occupation, now in its 35th year: Washington's decisive diplomatic, military, and economic intervention in support of the killings, the harsh and destructive siege over many years, the daily humiliation to which Palestinians are subjected, the expanding settlements designed to break the occupied territories into Bantustan-like cantons and take control of the resources, the gross violation of the Geneva Conventions, and other actions that are recognized as crimes throughout most of the world, apart from the US, which has prime responsibility for them.
And capping off the selection is number fourI also wonder what the kill ratio is in Afghanistan. Perhaps 1 member of the al-Qaida network is killed for every 10 run-of-the-mill Afghan soldiers and civilians who are basically just trying to get through their own lives like the rest of us. Or maybe it's 1 terrorist for a 100 Afghanis. I suspect the real figure is more like a 1000 non-terrorists dead for the life of 1 genuine terrorist who might ever bother America.
And now for the contenders of the argumentsThe bottom line is this: Ordinary Afghan people, men and women and children who have never done anything wrong to anyone, are getting mangled and killed by American bombs. The innocents have spouses, parents and friends, and these spouses, parents and friends may quite naturally end up hating those who mangled and killed their loved ones.
A: Noam Chomsky
B: Ted Rall
C: Howard Dean
D: David Duke
E: Lyndon LaRouche
So, match the quote number to the individual you believe would have argued that point, note that two of the quotes will come from the same individual.
How freaking weird is it the way that the far left and the far right have so much in common, bunch of wankers the lot of them.
Answer key below (highlight too read)
1D, 2A, 3D. 4B