Bush commutes Libby's prison sentence

[struckpx]

Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


Having children doesn't give anyone special treatment. There are a lot of fathers in prison. He should of thought of his children and his country before he perjured himself.

hahaha, wow. no remorse.

[Diemen]

Originally posted by struckpx


Cheney yes, Bush no. Should the middle man who is covering up for Cheney with two young children have to sit in jail for two years over this, no.

Now answer the second question. Since you agree that Cheney's actions could be grounds for impeachment:

Would you also agree that preventing an investigation from bringing to justice those who were ultimately responsible for a crime is a cowardly act and shows an unhealthy amount of contempt for justice and the rule of law?

[struckpx]

Originally posted by Vincent Vega


True statement. Bush doesn't know what's going on on every issue.

mature response.

[BVS]

Originally posted by struckpx


hahaha, wow. no remorse.

Why should I have remorse? Why do you have remorse? Is it only because you are a conservative?

[struckpx]

Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


Why should I have remorse? Why do you have remorse? Is it only because you are a conservative?

far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.

[BVS]

Originally posted by struckpx


far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.

Didn't say anything about a party.

Just because you have a right, doesn't mean you are doing your job. Don't confuse the two.

Call them as you see them? That's funny...


But tell me, because you didn't answer the question... Why do you feel remorse?

[unico]

Originally posted by struckpx


far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.

the constitution did not grant him the right to lie to us in the state of the union address in 2003, and the loads of other times he lied to the public, just so he can pursue his own selfish interests.

[Diemen]

Originally posted by struckpx

i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.

That's such a weak excuse. Does the circumstances in which he used his constitutional power mean absolutely nothing to you?

What if Libby had murdered someone? Well, Bush was only using his constitutional powers when he commuted the sentence, so I don't see what the fuss is about...

And apparently you still don't see the link. By commuting Libby's sentence, we can't go after Cheney on this. Still think Bush is squeaky clean?

[phillyfan26]

Originally posted by struckpx


far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.

NO ONE IS DISPUTING THAT HE HAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO USE COMMUTATION.

We are disputing using it to COVER UP CHENEY. It's not OK that he is using it to cover up a crime. Just because he's friends/co-workers with Cheney means he should cover up Cheney's crime?

And calling them as you see them doesn't work when you don't open your eyes. It's hard to see with your eyes shut.

[A_Wanderer]

And Cheney wasn't frogmarched out why?

[unico]

because libby contradicted himself and now is lying about cheney's involvement. he hasn't come right out and said "cheney ordered this", but he had said conflicting statements in his web of lies to protect him.

[phillyfan26]

And thanks to the commutation, Libby doesn't have to say anything else.

[struckpx]

Originally posted by phillyfan26


And calling them as you see them doesn't work when you don't open your eyes. It's hard to see with your eyes shut.

so now i can only view it as your way or it isn't correct?

[phillyfan26]

Originally posted by struckpx



so now i can only view it as your way or it isn't correct?

No. I'm saying that you don't read all the posts and don't look up all the facts.

Please address the rest of that post you quoted.

[struckpx]

Originally posted by phillyfan26


No. I'm saying that you don't read all the posts and don't look up all the facts.

Please address the rest of that post you quoted.

hahaha, ok. No comment. It's not worth arguing.

[phillyfan26]

Originally posted by struckpx


hahaha, ok. No comment. It's not worth arguing.

You've admitted this, though, so how am I incorrect?

Please address the rest of my post you quoted before.

[struckpx]

Originally posted by phillyfan26


You've admitted this, though, so how am I incorrect?

Please address the rest of my post you quoted before.

I don't want to get into it. I am not going to comment anymore on this matter. It is a waste of time arguing over nothing. And I could write out the history of every event in this case. That still wouldn't be enough evidence for some here. So, go ahead and continue w/ your "Impeach Bush" slogans.

[phillyfan26]

Originally posted by struckpx


I don't want to get into it. I am not going to comment anymore on this matter. It is a waste of time arguing over nothing. And I could write out the history of every event in this case. That still wouldn't be enough evidence for some here. So, go ahead and continue w/ your "Impeach Bush" slogans.

It's not nothing, though, that's the thing. It's a government cover up.

By saying, "I don't want to get into it," do you mean that you have no rebuttal for my point?

[BVS]

Originally posted by struckpx


I don't want to get into it. I am not going to comment anymore on this matter. It is a waste of time arguing over nothing. And I could write out the history of every event in this case. That still wouldn't be enough evidence for some here. So, go ahead and continue w/ your "Impeach Bush" slogans.

It probably would do you good to step away for awhile. Just for sanity sake.

A government cover up isn't a little thing. And because you keep saying that, I really don't think you grasp what's happened, and I'm positive you couldn't write out the whole history for your facts have been incorrect in many of your posts.

[Headache in a Suitcase]

Originally posted by Lila64
Is there any hope for this country?

as scummy as it may be it's bush's constitutional right to do so, a right that has been used scummily in the past by presidents from both democrats and republicans, will be used in the future in scummy ways by both parties.

heck, reagan pardoned george steinbrenner... GEORGE STEINBRENNER! if we can surivive that, i think we'll be okay on this one.