Blair - should he stay or should he go?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

deep

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Messages
28,598
Location
A far distance down.
Pressure on Blair to step down grows


Saturday, May 06, 2006 08:36:12 pm


LONDON: Pressure on British Prime Minister Tony Blair to resign following his Labour Party's stinging defeat during local elections this week, grew as supporters of prime minister-in-waiting Gordon Brown were reported on Saturday to be calling for a clear timeline for Blair's departure.

The BBC reported that Blair and Chancellor of the Exchequer Brown, long considered his designated successor, had agreed to meet for talks this weekend, while the Left-leaning Guardian newspaper reported that a letter calling on Blair to step down had been circulated among a group of Labour MPs.

"If Mr Blair does not bow to the pressure backbench MPs intend to publish a letter, possibly by the end of next week," wrote the Guardian, which is considered an authority on Labour party matters.

As many as 75 Labour MPs may have signed the circular calling for Blair either to issue a clear timeline for an "orderly transition" or face a formal challenge to his leadership, the Guardian added.

On Friday, Blair responded to Labour's losses of 319 seats in the local elections with a radical shake-up of his cabinet.

Home Secretary Charles Clarke was sacked in the wake of a scandal over his failure to deport foreigners who had served time in the country's prisons, while Foreign Secretary Jack Straw was demoted to the post of leader of the house.

In all, 13 cabinet and senior party posts changed hands in the reshuffle.

The Conservative Party under its new leader David Cameron turned out big winners of the election. The Tories won 40 percent of the vote to take 316 council seats, making it the strongest party at local level.

The Liberal Democrats took 27 percent of the vote, ahead of Labour's 26 percent in the election that saw a voter turnout of only 36 percent.


For the good of the Labour party -
he should go.
 
Considering that the Labour Party has a heavyweight in Gordon Brown, it would probably be smart for Blair to resign.

Melon
 
I agree he should go soon 'cos it just seems now as if the pressure will continue on him 'til he does.
 
I think he should go as well. I can't see any good coming of him staying. And I actually think Brown will make a very good PM.

There's been so many reshuffles lately that I have no idea which minister is doing which job. :huh: So many of these new appointments smack of Blair trying to consolidate his position rather than who's appropriate for the job that it's sickening. Or maybe Tony's just been sampling Reid's secret stash... :wink:
 
I agree about Gordon Brown - i like him somehow plus he's Scottish! :D

I can't help agreeing however with one column writer who thought that he might not be very poular with voters down south, unfortunately :uhoh: :(
 
Speaking as a moderate conservative, this presents an opportunity for David Cameron.

Of course the right wing conservatives hate Cameron - which in my view is a point in his favour.
 
melon said:
Considering that the Labour Party has a heavyweight in Gordon Brown, it would probably be smart for Blair to resign.

Melon

Brown is pro-big government, an old style socialist / interventionist at heart. I personally think it would not be a good thing for Britain if he were to accede to power.
 
financeguy said:
Brown is pro-big government, an old style socialist / interventionist at heart. I personally think it would not be a good thing for Britain if he were to accede to power.

Well, I'm not judging whether he's a good candidate or not. I'm merely talking party strategy. I may be semi-adept at Canadian politics, but I'm semi-"semi-adept" at UK politics...lol.

Anyway, from what I know about Gordon Brown (he hired Greenspan as a consultant...and Greenspan is doing it for free methinks) and David Cameron (his social stances make the U.S. Democratic Party seem like fascists in comparison), I think it would be a very interesting election campaign between the two.

I've always wondered what a bigotry-free election campaign would look like. :hmm:

Melon
 
Last edited:
melon said:
Well, I'm not judging whether he's a good candidate or not. I may be semi-adept at Canadian politics, but I'm semi-"semi-adept" at UK politics...lol.

Anyway, from what I know about Gordon Brown (he hired Greenspan as a consultant...and Greenspan is doing it for free methinks) and David Cameron (his social stances make the U.S. Democratic Party seem like fascists in comparison), I think it would be a very interesting election campaign between the two.

I've always wondered what a bigotry-free election campaign would look like. :hmm:

Melon

Yes, in terms of social stances the mainstream modern day Conservative party in Britain is a lot more tolerant and inclusive than it used to be.

One thing that's interesting to note - comparing Britain to the US - is that the Christian conservative movement isn't really a significant factor in British politics - it does exist, but it is largely a fringe group, with limited influence on politics.
 
financeguy said:
One thing that's interesting to note - comparing Britain to the US - is that the Christian conservative movement isn't really a significant factor in British politics - it does exist, but it is largely a fringe group, with limited influence on politics.

Indeed. You sent all your religious fanatics onto boats destined for North America. :wink:

Melon
 
I can't believe Jack Straw has been demoted by the way. I always thought he was regarded as being very good at his job. And to replace him with Beckett is an absolute joke. I have no faith in her capabilities as foreign secretary whatsoever.
 
That's a coincidence 'cos i thought that too about Jack Straw since he seems to be one of the best people in the government!

He had a good partnership with Condaleeza Rice apparently so that makes it even more strange :shrug:

I can't imagine Margaret Beckett fitting in with that position :no:
 
All very dramatic on ITN tonight. Headline story of "Labour rebels urged not to stage a coup on Blair". He's going to find it very difficult to get legislation passed after this latest Cabinet reshuffle I reckon.
 
I heard that on the radio but haven't seen the tv news yet.
 
melon said:


Indeed. You sent all your religious fanatics onto boats destined for North America. :wink:

Melon
But they imported a lot from the former Empire so it balances out in the end.
 
Well Tony Blair came out fighting today,saying that he'd decide when to go&wouldn't be told! :ohmy:
 
Labour as they are now reminds me alot of the Tories during Major's premiership - and that can't be considered as a good thing.
I like Blair as a person, but he needs to go to give the party a decent chance of recovery before the next election. That's not to say that I necessarily believe that Cameron (or whomever happens to be in control of the Tories at the time) will walk it, but that small majority they have right now would just get even smaller.
 
count this one as a vote for
"he should go"?
In an interview with GQ magazine, the reporter asked him: "Would the assassination of, say, Tony Blair by a suicide bomber - if there were no other casualties - be justified as revenge for the war on Iraq?"

Mr Galloway replied: "Yes, it would be morally justified. I am not calling for it - but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of 7/7. It would be entirely logical and explicable. And morally equivalent to ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq - as Blair did."
 
Galloway is a useful idiot for the Islamists, just as (Did you lie to us)Tony is a useful idiot for the neocons.
 
He should resign. There's a reason why that election went the way it did. I was shocked at what happened to Jack Straw. I got virtually no news in Turkey because alot of times the TV in my hotel room didn't work, but I did get the news of this election.
 
Poll shows most Britons want Blair to resign now

02/04/2007

Prime Minister Tony Blair

Most Britons think Prime Minister Tony Blair should step down now, according to an opinion poll published on Sunday after a week of damaging headlines for the British premier over an investigation into political funding.

Blair, who plans to resign later this year after more than a decade in power, was questioned by police for a second time last month about the case which has also seen some of his closest aides arrested.

Blair said in a speech to activists from his Labour Party on Saturday that he did not underestimate the scale of the problems facing his government. But he has said the cash-for-peerages probe will not force him to bring forward his departure date.

The ICM poll published in the Sunday Express newspaper found 56 percent of those polled believed Blair should resign now. Even among those who termed themselves as Labour voters, 43 percent said Blair should leave his post immediately.
 
Blair really isn't in control of the country anymore, all the diplomatic meetings etc are being carried out by Gordon Brown, there is only one reason I can think why Blair is still remaining on.....he wants to sort out the Northern Ireland assembly, it is the only thing he can salvage that will be a good mark in history for him.
 
Back
Top Bottom