Bet you never would have expected to read this... - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-19-2003, 08:23 AM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
speedracer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 07:01 PM
Bet you never would have expected to read this...,00.html

speedracer is offline  
Old 01-19-2003, 09:10 AM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
hiphop's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the jungle
Posts: 7,410
Local Time: 01:01 AM

"But this does not necessarily mean a unanimous Security Council vote on such action. It might be difficult for some to accept a sole veto from Beijing autocrats, for example, on action which might restore democracy to another nation."

And so? Many votes are difficult to accept, and what does he mean by Beijing autocrats?

Not a very diplomatic article.

hiphop is offline  
Old 01-19-2003, 10:29 AM   #3
Blue Crack Supplier
Popmartijn's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 32,761
Local Time: 12:01 AM

Actually, I largely agree with this article. War should be avoided as much as possible, but when there is no way out, then a multilateral action, under supervision of the UN, is the way to go. With the discovery this week of some unreported shells and some documents in the house of a scientist about enriching uranium (in total 3,000 pages) it seems as if Saddam was breaching the resolution. Just an excuse stating "Sorry, forgot about those" is not enough.

The article also has some weaker points though. I disagree with its view that Bush dutifully pursued a multilateral approach over Iraq. If he had it his way he'd bombed Iraq long ago. But he was more or less forced to work through the UN, which he did in the end (but still with making claims that the US would go on without the UN if they felt like it).
As for the quote Whenhiphopdrovethebigcars singled out, that's another point I disagree with the article. It's true, an unanimous vote by the Security Council is not necessary, but there may be no veto from the five permanent members (of which China is one). So if China vetoes the action (or one of the other permanent members) then that has to be accepted. It may be a lousy decision, but the decision was made according to the rules.

C ya!

Popmartijn is online now  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright ©