Ann Coulter calls John Edwards a "faggot" - Page 5 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-05-2007, 12:00 AM   #81
Jesus Online
 
Angela Harlem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: a glass castle
Posts: 30,163
Local Time: 12:45 PM
yeah, point taken, irvine.

gee, all this accepting each other's points?? where is the usual fym ranting gone? this is too civil!
__________________

__________________
<a href=https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v196/angelaharlem/thPaul_Roos28.jpg target=_blank>https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...aul_Roos28.jpg</a>
Angela Harlem is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 07:43 AM   #82
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,324
Local Time: 09:45 PM
This is even more offensive than what Coulter said at that convention.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/0...ms-of-katrina/

Newt Gingrich, (speaking at CPAC) blamed the residents of New Orleans' 9th Ward for a "failure of citizenship," by being "so uneducated and so unprepared, they literally couldn't get out of the way of a hurricane."

And he called for a "deep investigation" into this "failure of citizenship."

Here's the full quote:

"How can you have the mess we have in New Orleans, and not have had deep investigations of the federal government, the state government, the city government, and the failure of citizenship in the Ninth Ward, where 22,000 people were so uneducated and so unprepared, they literally couldn't get out of the way of a hurricane."
__________________

MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 08:39 AM   #83
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
i don't even know how to react to that.

did he say the same thing about the white people in St. Bernard Parish?
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 08:51 AM   #84
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,324
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Well he singled out Ninth Ward, so I doubt it..I guess we'd have to read the rest of the speech

That convention sounds like such an enlightened experience.
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 09:53 AM   #85
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
CTU2fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,366
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Newt Gingrich? Who the hell rattled his cage? Jeez, can Rush be far behind? We need all the "caricatures of conservatism" to pop off.

Ya Irvine, our (American) Left kind of sucks. We're anything but unified, and it's a pity. I'm sure the right loves that disorganization too. While the idea of uniting against a common oppressor sounds nice, historically it just hasn't happened. Seems pretty stupid to me, but it is what it is I suppose.

Personally I don't give a rat's ass what Ann Coulter has to say, other than to mock her when she makes herself look particularly stupid (like now). The Gingrich stuff is more bothersome, only because the man was a Congressman. The guy really has no clue. Of course, since his remarks weren't explicitly racist no one will notice - they were blantantly classist, but that's OK because we don't have class in America, right? Or we just have a middle class...riiiiiiight.
CTU2fan is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 10:18 AM   #86
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by CTU2fan
Ya Irvine, our (American) Left kind of sucks. We're anything but unified, and it's a pity. I'm sure the right loves that disorganization too. While the idea of uniting against a common oppressor sounds nice, historically it just hasn't happened. Seems pretty stupid to me, but it is what it is I suppose.


i almost think that there's not even agreement on what or who the "oppressor" is, it's just the sense of having been oppressed, and with very good reason (from racist housing codes to the not-as-of-yet Non-Discrimination in Employment act to $.73 for every dollar a man earns).

and it's sloppy thinking to blame the Straight White Christian Male, since he didn't choose to be Straight or White or Christian (usually) or Male, but i do think it's advantageous to point out how the Straight White Christian Male is advantaged in ways that others are not, white at the same time realizing that he, too, is also oppressed by sexism, or racism, or whatever.

and now i feel like i'm taking my undergraduate cultural studies courses again.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 11:45 AM   #87
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by CTU2fan

Ya Irvine, our (American) Left kind of sucks. We're anything but unified, and it's a pity. I'm sure the right loves that disorganization too. While the idea of uniting against a common oppressor sounds nice, historically it just hasn't happened. Seems pretty stupid to me, but it is what it is I suppose.
The problem is that you (Americans) don't have a political left to speak of. The Democrats are not a left-leaning party by anyone's standards except maybe those of people somewhere in the middle of Texas. And there is no viable third party. The Greens are not a left-leaning party, in any sense of the word, really. People assume they are because of their environmental positions but no Green party platform is leftist in essence.

You have good leftist organizations and grassroots movements and I think they are picking up steam more and more lately, but that hasn't really translated into the political sphere quite yet.
anitram is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 11:56 AM   #88
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram


The problem is that you (Americans) don't have a political left to speak of. The Democrats are not a left-leaning party by anyone's standards except maybe those of people somewhere in the middle of Texas. And there is no viable third party. The Greens are not a left-leaning party, in any sense of the word, really. People assume they are because of their environmental positions but no Green party platform is leftist in essence.

You have good leftist organizations and grassroots movements and I think they are picking up steam more and more lately, but that hasn't really translated into the political sphere quite yet.


when you speak of being genuinlely Left, in comparison to the rest of the world, i think it's due to not having a true economic Leftist platform in the US. there is no desire for socialism in the US -- let alone communism, as you'll get in countries like France -- for a variety of complex reasons, not least of which is that everyone in the US thinks they can be rich, as well as the fact that the US hasn't had the same history of working class exploitation as you have had in Europe.

or, at least that history hasn't been as inherited as it is seems to have been in Europe, based on my experience. Amtrak employes don't schedule their strikes for August like they do in Paris. farmers don't park their tractors on the DC Beltway and block the traffic in order to shut down the city so they can demand more farm subsidies like they do in Brussels. thse all seem like populist Leftism at work. these things almost became comical to me as an American living in Europe, the expectation that strikes = better pay, that you're automatically exploited because you're working class, but that was due to culture more than anything else.

that said, i do think the American left does a good job at articulating racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. these things are well fleshed out and debated endlessly in the media, and results in a rather sophisticated understanding of DIY identity, whereas there's little to no actual debate on economics. everyone hates taxes, it's just how much do you actually hate taxes that becomes the debate.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 12:06 PM   #89
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 09:45 PM
These are all good points.

But then how do you explain a country like Canada - where we do have some socialist-leaning initiatives like universal health care and subsidized universities? We have had a much more similar history to the US in terms of worker exploitation and immigrants arriving here thinking they can get rich, yet we haven't rejected economic social policies in the same way.

And when it comes to articulating those other issues - your left (if you're referring to the Dems?) has been pathetic in my eyes as far as gay rights are concerned. Even our Conservatives in Canada, as a party are more progressive on the issue! Half of the Dems running for office don't want to talk about abortion or are pro-life. This isn't even a topic in our political discourse in Canada anymore. It's seen as settled, and that's it. Decriminalization of marijuana is another example. Having clean injection sites for drug addicts is another. And I think we'll see the issue of human euthanasia come up again here and I do believe within the next decade or so, our Supreme Court will overrule its previous decisions on the matter. So even on the non-economic issues, I think your political left (ie. Dems) are pretty lame.
anitram is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 12:30 PM   #90
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram
But then how do you explain a country like Canada - where we do have some socialist-leaning initiatives like universal health care and subsidized universities? We have had a much more similar history to the US in terms of worker exploitation and immigrants arriving here thinking they can get rich, yet we haven't rejected economic social policies in the same way.



i'm not sure -- and i was wondering this as well. i suppose there are small differences in the US and Canada that might amount to larger differences when played out. i would say that the US spends much more on the military than Canada does, and, bluntly, this benefits the average Canadian much more as the government can afford to pay for things like subsidized universities and universal health care since Canada doesn't have to pay to defend it's coasts. but that only explains so much; it's the history of class warfare/struggle/proletariat vs. bourgeoise that simply hasn't played out as dramatically in the US as it has, certainly in Europe, and am i to assume in Canada as well?

i think one other difference is one of overall national mission. and i say this since i'm certainly no expert in all things Canada -- one of my best friend's mother is Canadian, have been several times and think all is lovely, drank a whole lot in Scotland with Canadians -- but an American who lived in Toronto for 15 years once told me that "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" is quite different from "Peace, Order, and Good Government." ultimately, in the US, whether right or wrong, taxes and government programs are seen as anathema to liberty. that's the mantra. that government is a necessary evil at best, and a shackle on the foot of human liberty at worst. i'm sure these attitudes have historical roots that one would need several dissertations to trace, but i do think there is a difference in overall philosophy that perhaps manifests itself in different attitudes towards universal health care.




Quote:
And when it comes to articulating those other issues - your left (if you're referring to the Dems?) has been pathetic in my eyes as far as gay rights are concerned. Even our Conservatives in Canada, as a party are more progressive on the issue! Half of the Dems running for office don't want to talk about abortion or are pro-life. This isn't even a topic in our political discourse in Canada anymore. It's seen as settled, and that's it. Decriminalization of marijuana is another example. Having clean injection sites for drug addicts is another. And I think we'll see the issue of human euthanasia come up again here and I do believe within the next decade or so, our Supreme Court will overrule its previous decisions on the matter. So even on the non-economic issues, I think your political left (ie. Dems) are pretty lame.

one word: Christianity.

seriously. not all Christians, not all forms of Christianity, but the political influence of the church on American life cannot be underestimated, and i'm sure it looks positively medieval to many on the outside. (and i will say that the success of religion in the US is due to the generally positive historical relationship the US has had with religion, certainly in comparison to Europe, but that's another book to be written).

i also think we have to look at populations. as i've said before, there are more Californians than Canadians. it's far easier to get 30m people to agree on something than it is for 300m, and 300m people from all corners of the globe living in wildly different areas (despite the surface of homogenization, where homogenization is actually a celebration of difference, because i might be from DC and 80s is from Texas but i bet we both like hamburgers) and enough space to surround yourself with people who think, look, talk, and believe just like you do. not that there aren't wide open spaces in Canada, but it doesn't seem to my casual observer's eye that there is as much of an urban/rural divide in Canada, or, the population of urban Canada dwarfs the population of rural Canada. not so in the US.

that said, i think the US is actually quite good at dealing with race and with successfully assimilating our immigrants. the gay thing ... eh, give it time. there are fewer more pro-gay places than a major north american city, it's just that Kansas has some catching up to do.

but this is all very interesting. thanks for the discussion.

and, ultimately, i think this is a question that you're far more positioned to answer than i: why is Canada one of the most progressive nations on earth?
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 01:26 PM   #91
Breakdancing Soul Pilgrim
 
UberBeaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the most serious...douch hammer ever
Posts: 20,318
Local Time: 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by MrsSpringsteen
This is even more offensive than what Coulter said at that convention.
"How can you have the mess we have in New Orleans, and not have had deep investigations of the federal government, the state government, the city government, and the failure of citizenship in the Ninth Ward, where 22,000 people were so uneducated and so unprepared, they literally couldn't get out of the way of a hurricane."
[/B]

I think maybe you're reading too much into it. I think he's saying they people of the 8th ward were uneducated about the hurricane and it's effects. I think he's saying the governments at all levels are to be blamed, not the residents. "Failure of citizenship" sounds to me like the people in positions of responsibility (who are citizens) failed the people. I don't think he's being racist here.
UberBeaver is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 01:50 PM   #92
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by UberBeaver



I think maybe you're reading too much into it. I think he's saying they people of the 8th ward were uneducated about the hurricane and it's effects. I think he's saying the governments at all levels are to be blamed, not the residents. "Failure of citizenship" sounds to me like the people in positions of responsibility (who are citizens) failed the people. I don't think he's being racist here.


interesting ... re-reading, i can see it how you understood it, though i would argue that he's blaming the people of the 9th ward as well as all levels of government, that they are themselves to blame though they may have been failed by society at many levels, which i don't altogether disagree with (everyone is a citizen, not just elected officials).

it does, however, beg the question as to where these people were supposed to go to get out of the way of the hurricane.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 03:41 PM   #93
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 06:45 PM
Why is Howard Stern given a free pass? He's just a vulgar as she is...only more Liberal.
AEON is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 03:44 PM   #94
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 09:45 PM
First of all, Howard Stern is not liberal. Have you ever listened to his idiotic views?

Second, Howard Stern wasn't speaking at some sort of DNC meeting or something similar. Ann was invited to CPAC, it's something entirely different than a shock jock who has his own show on satellite radio. How are you even missing this?
anitram is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 04:48 PM   #95
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,324
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by UberBeaver



I think maybe you're reading too much into it. I think he's saying they people of the 8th ward were uneducated about the hurricane and it's effects. I think he's saying the governments at all levels are to be blamed, not the residents. "Failure of citizenship" sounds to me like the people in positions of responsibility (who are citizens) failed the people. I don't think he's being racist here.
I see your point insofar as you could say people weren't educated about how to evacuate and all that-but did you read the other speech he gave in 2006 in that link? And even if that is how he meant it, he really needs to clarify that and use other words.

http://www.newt.org/backpage.asp?art=3773

"The last great domestic challenge I think is the fact that we have large structured government institutions that simply don’t work. You saw some of this with what happened in New Orleans and Katrina. The fact is, in Katrina, government failed. The federal government failed. The state of Louisiana failed. The city of New Orleans failed. And for 22,000 citizens in the lower 9th ward, citizenship failed. They literally did not have the education, the training, the habits of responsibility, or the capacity to get out of the way of a hurricane."

Habits of responsibility? Capacity? Knowing what I know about Newt, it all strikes me as a bunch of codewords and it sounds a certain way to me. Racist undertones at least even if you don't want to label it overtly racist. Those lazy, irresponsible, poor black folk with some sort of "diminished capacity"? Citizenship means citizens to me, not the people who were supposed to get them out of there.
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 05:35 PM   #96
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by AEON
Why is Howard Stern given a free pass? He's just a vulgar as she is...only more Liberal.
well,

if the Democrats invite him to be a guest speaker with all their Presidential Candidates and he calls Clarence Thomas or Condi the N word. I think we would hear about it.


a few weeks back Obama said lives have been "wasted" in Iraq.

He had to immediately apologize, and he did.


and then McCain goes on Letterman to announce he will be a Candidate and he says the same damn thing while on Letterman.

Yes, he did apologize.

He changed it to "sacrificed."
deep is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 07:56 PM   #97
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
anyway, back on track ... i suppose what i'm disappointed with, in ALL the candidates, is here is a perfect opportunity to acknolwedge the discrimination that gays and lesbians face every day, yet no one has yet to say the word "gay" in relation to Ms. Coulter's slur.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 08:03 PM   #98
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by AEON
Why is Howard Stern given a free pass? He's just a vulgar as she is...only more Liberal.
Another bad comparison.
BVS is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 08:03 PM   #99
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 11:45 AM
They could say that Ann Coulters slur is so gay
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 08:50 PM   #100
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,856
Local Time: 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
They could say that Ann Coulters slur is so gay


you should check out Sarah Silverman.
__________________

Irvine511 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×