An Olympic Boycott: would it have any effect at all? - Page 7 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-14-2008, 08:46 AM   #121
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 10:31 PM
Wasn't it also a bit "messy" when some of these people went through the Cultural Revolution?
__________________

martha is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 08:52 AM   #122
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha
Wasn't it also a bit "messy" when some of these people went through the Cultural Revolution?
People got caught in Cultural Revolution are hitting their middle 50 to 60, and now preparing for their retired life.

China has 5000 years history, and the history has loads of events that 100 times more messy than the cultural revolution.
__________________

butter7 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 12:15 PM   #123
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 10:31 PM
You really should work for the government PR department when you go back home.
martha is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 05:41 PM   #124
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha
You really should work for the government PR department when you go back home.
Grab a history book and read it yourself.
butter7 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 05:50 PM   #125
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 10:31 PM
After you.
martha is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 06:02 PM   #126
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by martha
After you.
Chinese history is the compulsory subject since Jr high.

PS
In the highschool geography graduaction exam that I sat for, the last question is picture based, two options: 1, wrote the name of the state of the US, student got marked on the correct name. 2, draw the map of Australia, and the lines that distinguish the amout of rainfall that caused the differente geographycal appearance of each region. I did the second one.

I wonder how America school teach and test their students? Why so many pro-tibet people have no idea where Tibet is?
butter7 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 06:25 PM   #127
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by butter7


Chinese history is the compulsory subject since Jr high.


What an interesting version you must get.
martha is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 06:29 PM   #128
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ásgarðr
Posts: 11,782
Local Time: 01:31 AM
It's my personal view that each nation's take on history is tainted with historically inaccurate nationalism--both China and the U.S. included. It is often less about fabricating history, and more about what I'd call "sins of omission"; that is, glossing over certain parts of history, while fixating on others.

And, yes, I do know where Tibet is on the map.
melon is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 06:31 PM   #129
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon


And, yes, I do know where Tibet is on the map.
Me too.
martha is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:23 AM   #130
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon
It's my personal view that each nation's take on history is tainted with historically inaccurate nationalism--both China and the U.S. included. It is often less about fabricating history, and more about what I'd call "sins of omission"; that is, glossing over certain parts of history, while fixating on others.

And, yes, I do know where Tibet is on the map.
I know what you mean, and I agree with you in certain extent. However, if you use the America standard to see China, it's not going to get a correct result.

China is only a communist country for 50 years, compare with the nation's history, the CCP is just like a drop of water in an great ocean.

It's a Chinese tradition that the current government are not allowed to write it's own history, but only the previous government that was pulled down. e.g the official history book for the Qin dynasty was wrote by the history officer of Han dynasty; the official history book for Ming dynasty was wrote by the history officer of Qing dynasty; and the Republic of China government was reponsible for the Qing history. By letting your former enemy to write your history, the history itself could be recorded in a way without any personal favour. The CCP gov is not qualify to write any history book yet, because the Republic of China government is still exist in Taiwan.

If you use this standard for American history, that would be no history book that could qualify it, since the US hasn't changed it's social system ever since the first day, except for the American Indian part.
butter7 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:56 AM   #131
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
The Olympic Torch Relay Campaign

2008/04/08 LHASA/BERLIN

(Own report) - Conference reports and the research of a Canadian journalist reveal that a German Foreign Ministry front organization is playing a decisive role in the preparations of the anti-Chinese Tibet campaign. According to this information, the campaign is being orchestrated from a Washington based headquarters. It had been assigned the task of organizing worldwide "protests" at a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (affiliated with the German Free Democratic Party - FDP) in May 2007. The plans were developed with the collaboration of the US State Department and the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile and call for high profile actions along the route of the Olympic Torch Relay and are supposed to reach a climax in August during the games in Beijing. The campaign began already last summer and is now profiting from the current uprising in the west of the People's Republic of China that is receiving prominent coverage in the German media. The uprising was initiated with murderous pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetan members of the population, including the Muslim Chinese minority. Numerous deaths of non-Tibetans provoked a reaction of the Chinese security forces.

According to the research by a Canadian journalist, a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (FNSt) gave the impetus to the current anti-Chinese Tibet campaign that violently forced the interruption of the Olympian Torch Relay in Paris last Monday.[1] The conference was the fifth "International Tibet Support Groups Conference," that was held from May 11 - 14, 2007 in Brussels. According to FNSt information this conference was supposed to do nothing other than the four preceding conferences [2] - "coordinate the work of the international Tibet groups and consolidate the links between them with the central Tibetan Government in Exile."[3] The German foundation, which is largely state financed, began the conference preparations in March 2005, and coordinated its plans with the Dalai Lama at his headquarters in the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile in Dharamsala, India. More than 300 participants from 56 countries, 36 Tibetan associations and 145 Tibet support groups were represented at the conference.
This is the first two paragraphs of the article, if you interested in reading the original complete article, here is the link:
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56145

I found this one interesting because the full chinese translation version is the headline of the probably most important Chinese newspaper for foreign politics on 13-04-08.
butter7 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:07 AM   #132
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by butter7


I know what you mean, and I agree with you in certain extent. However, if you use the America standard to see China, it's not going to get a correct result.

China is only a communist country for 50 years, compare with the nation's history, the CCP is just like a drop of water in an great ocean.

It's a Chinese tradition that the current government are not allowed to write it's own history, but only the previous government that was pulled down. e.g the official history book for the Qin dynasty was wrote by the history officer of Han dynasty; the official history book for Ming dynasty was wrote by the history officer of Qing dynasty; and the Republic of China government was reponsible for the Qing history. By letting your former enemy to write your history, the history itself could be recorded in a way without any personal favour. The CCP gov is not qualify to write any history book yet, because the Republic of China government is still exist in Taiwan.

If you use this standard for American history, that would be no history book that could qualify it, since the US hasn't changed it's social system ever since the first day, except for the American Indian part.
The abolition of slavery, westward expansion, imperial ambition and civil rights and liberties being expanded to minorities seem like significant changes in social system.
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:13 AM   #133
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by butter7

If you use this standard for American history, that would be no history book that could qualify it, since the US hasn't changed it's social system ever since the first day, except for the American Indian part.
Your posts make a lot more sense now...
BVS is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:03 AM   #134
Self-righteous bullshitter
 
BoMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan — Socialist paradise
Posts: 16,900
Local Time: 02:31 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon
It's my personal view that each nation's take on history is tainted with historically inaccurate nationalism--both China and the U.S. included. It is often less about fabricating history, and more about what I'd call "sins of omission"; that is, glossing over certain parts of history, while fixating on others.
While I'm inclined to agree with you here, certain "dark periods" of any given nation's history are at the very least mentioned in class and/or textbooks.

Here in Quebec we studied in depth the rise and fall of the extremist separatist movement, which culminated with the 1970 October Crisis. While textbooks may have glossed over certain facts, we nevertheless debated many of the topics in class. The onus falls on the teacher to go beyond the textbook, I suppose.

Maybe Vincent Vega can elaborate, but it's my understanding that German students learn all about Nazi Germany etc.

Tell me butter7, what do you know about June 4,1989? Was is it even mentioned in school at all?
__________________

BoMac is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 05:18 PM   #135
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,725
Local Time: 07:31 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoManiac

Maybe Vincent Vega can elaborate, but it's my understanding that German students learn all about Nazi Germany etc.
That's basically right. We spend at least 25% of history classes on WWII. We learn almost nothing about what happened after 1948, when the German states were founded. The last two school years it will all revolve around the time of the Weimar Republic to the end of WWII. And it's usually not limited to history classes.

And I think it's important that this is done. Too many are still too uninformed about what has happened. But I also think it would be necessary to learn some about the more recent history up until reunification. That's often rushed through as time is running out.

Currently, there is a German version of the movie "The Wave" in the cinemas, and for a German movie it is very good. Its depiction of how easy an authoritarian movement is started and gets out of hand is frightening, but I would see it's not unrealistic or exagerated.

But I digress...

The page, German Foreign Policy, has an interesting editorial:

Quote:
Editorial
"Information on German Foreign Policy" (german-foreign-policy.com) is compiled by a group of independent journalists and social scientists who observe, on an ongoing basis, Germany's renewed attempts to regain great power status in the economic, military and political arena.

The daily news, interviews and background information should be read against the background of the formative tendencies of German history. For this purpose, the column "History" provides extensive analyses.

"Information on German Foreign Policy" (german-foreign-policy.com) enables the readers to get in touch with journalists and social scientists who are considered specialists in numerous areas of German foreign policy. They are available as experts at scholarly conferences and as policy advisors in Germany and abroad.

The editors appreciate feedback and welcome supplements to our news and analyses. They welcome specific comments, especially from abroad.

The Editors
The editors have close links to socialists movements in Germany and I would call their objectivity into question (some of the socialist movement here still lives behind the moon, to be honest).
I'm not saying we shouldn't monitor what our government is doing, we certainly should, though I don't agree with the authors' perception that we are trying to grab for world domination again (if we did I would be busy with other things, after all ).

Here's the link to an article the author is taking some information from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...rnational/home
Vincent Vega is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:43 PM   #136
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoManiac


Tell me butter7, what do you know about June 4,1989? Was is it even mentioned in school at all?
Didn't I make it clear in the previous post? Until we overthrown the CCP government, we can't write history for the events that happened in the CCP period.

The June 4, 1989 is a popular topic to give a speech, for the social science professor who wanted attact more students to select his lecture. Similar topics also included discussions about the previous massive mistakes and failed policies that CCP made; international security and terrorism; anything about Iraq; the possitive outcome from 9-11; international politics and oil.

However, speeches and talkes is not the official history book. Unlike German students, like Vincent Vega mentioned, Chinese student spend very little time for WWII history in comparison. Both the WWII and the civial war history didn't extent more than five chapters, including the hisotory of the previous republic of China government and the CCP. In another hand, we got 6 whole-book of ancient history to chew down.

And for the modern Tibet history, the recommend reading is the book called: A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951 by Melvyn C. Goldstein, because we currently are not allowed to release any official version of the hisotry book for that period of time.
butter7 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:26 PM   #137
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
Your posts make a lot more sense now...
too bad

you did not understand

what she wrote
deep is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:53 PM   #138
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 12:31 AM
No, I understood, and it put a lot of her other comments on America in context...
BVS is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:16 PM   #139
War Child
 
butter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 785
Local Time: 04:31 PM
Quote:
On Sunday, April 13, 2008, Bush National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley talked about Nepal on A B C.


I found this video is really shocking. As a politician that hold the place like "National Security Advisor" really shouldn't make this kind of mistake.

Did anyone here watch the entire interview on TV? Any clue about this?
butter7 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 09:16 PM   #140
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 06:31 AM
Hadley had discussed the same issue (i.e. the Olympics, China, and Tibet) on FOX Network earlier the same morning, and didn't make the Tibet/Nepal mistake at that time. I think what happened was that the segment just before Hadley's on ABC featured an interview with Jimmy Carter, who was in Nepal monitoring the elections, and discussed Nepal with the ABC host (Stephanopoulos). As a result Hadley probably "had Nepal on the brain," as we say, when he went on-set, and thus proceeded to incorrectly say "Nepal" instead of "Tibet" five times. It's still pretty embarrassing that neither Hadley nor, apparently, Stephanopoulos ever caught the mistake, but I think crossed wires resulting from Carter's segment was the likely explanation.
__________________

__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×