Airhead America gets nutty

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Macfistowannabe

Rock n' Roll Doggie Band-aid
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
4,197
Location
Ohio
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17878

Air Assassination
By Ben Johnson
FrontPageMagazine.com | April 28, 2005

Frustrated by six years’ of steady reversals at the polls, the hardcore Left decided this week to foment a real coup de état: they want George W. Bush dead.

The Drudge Report has reported left-wing Air America Radio aired a spot on Monday threatening to assassinate President Bush for trying to reform Social Security. Network yacker Randi Rhodes played the following “humorous” radio drop during her afternoon drive show:

A spoiled child is telling us our Social Security isn’t safe anymore, so he is going to fix it for us. Well, here’s your answer, you ungrateful whelp: [audio sound of 4 gunshots being fired.] Just try it, you little bastard. [audio of gun being cocked].

Rhodes then giggled when the spot finished playing. Upon hearing a transcript, White House spokesman Scott McClellan reportedly called the incident “very inappropriate and over the line.”

This Wednesday, Rhodes offered a leftist apology – an expression of regret, all the while denying personal culpability and stating any wrongdoing is dwarfed by the sheer evil embodied by her political opponents She said:

If [the Secret Service] had to take two seconds out of their day to look into me, I apologize for that...But where is the apology when [conservatives] threaten judges from the Senate floor or from the House floor? Or where’s the investigation into Ann Coulter’s mouth?

The most recent cover of Time seemed more interested in investigating other parts of Coulter.

Despite Rhodes’ continual disavowal of such humor, this was (at least) her second death threat “joke” in as many years. Last May, Rhodes suggested the solution to the Bush administration could be found in The Godfather: “Like Fredo, somebody ought to take him out fishing and [sound of gunfire].” (The network also stated Donald Rumsfeld “ought to be tortured.” Those kidders!)

It seems appropriate that such desperation should issue from the pits of Air America. Last month, the HBO documentary Left of the Dial revealed the network’s utter bankruptcy, morally as well as financially. This ratings disaster has steadily lost market share in its home market of New York City, and even appealing to its core audience’s basest instincts can’t seem to revitalize it. (These are the footsteps Al Gore wants to follow into the media age?)

However, the entire Left has been in a roar for the blood of the American people’s chosen candidate since before his historic re-election. Last fall, Charlie Brooker in the British leftist newspaper Guardian asked, “John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr. – where are you now that we need you?” As I said last October in my article “Euro-Socialists Say: Assassinate Bush,” so-called “peace activists”:

carried signs spouting such loving slogans as, “Bush is the disease. Death is the cure”; and “We Support Our Troops, When They Shoot their Officers.” These fanatics regularly call Bush the new Hitler – and their more insightful followers may have deduced that no one would have shed a tear if Hitler had been assassinated in 1933. Yet it appears no one on the Left has denounced this call-to-arms.

The most extreme “Clinton-haters,” putatively people such as Coulter and R. Emmett Tyrell, never joked about assassinating the adulterer-in-chief. The media (again) demonized Jesse Helms after quoting him out-of-context in 1994, when he said, “Mr. Clinton better watch out if he comes down here. He better have a bodyguard.” [1] Forget death threats, the Left went ballistic when Rep. Dan Burton called President Clinton a “scumbag” at the height of Zippergate.

The irony is this latest incitement to regicide comes even as leftists (including Rhodes) claim conservatives “openly threaten sitting judges.” The Left has revived the anti-center/right blood libel after Senate Republicans called on the full chamber to do its constitutional duty and hold a floor vote on President Bush’s judicial nominees. Left-wingers desperately wish to bottle these judges up, because the judiciary is the one branch of government where their discredited philosophy still holds sway. (Not coincidentally, it is also the unelected branch.) The threat of “losing” their tenuous grasp on the Supreme Court at some point in the next four years looms menacingly. With the implosion of “mainstream” media, its audience ever eroded by cable networks like Fox News, talk radio, and internet sources like FrontPage Magazine all the traditional institutions of leftist dominance seem crumbling beneath the weight of – choice. (And this is one case in which the Left does not endorse “choice on earth.”) What’s next, an Academic Bill of Rights to pry their death-grip off of academia?


Among those who have commented on Air America’s recently broadcast death wish, most have equated their vitriol with that of “conservative talk radio.” This is an injustice to conservatives, who seem to recognize the few examples of inappropriate behavior from their own media representatives. When MSNBC cancelled Michael Savage’s short-lived TV show after he barked that a homosexual caller should “get AIDS and die,” several conservative writers supported the network’s action. However, NPR political star Nina Totenberg shills on at taxpayer expense, despite the fact that she wished Jesse Helms would contract AIDS and publicly hoped Gen. Jerry Boykin “is not long for this world.”

When not talking about sending the president of the United States a 44-caliber message, the Left is actively committing acts of violence against conservative speakers like David Horowitz, William Kristol, Ann Coulter, and Pat Buchanan. (Following Kristol’s assault at Earlham College, an Indymedia partisan wrote, “If Kristol had got what he deserved, it would not have been a pie.”)

Rhodes did not even offer her apology, such as it was, until two days after faux pas, and then only after the internet brought her under national scrutiny. This gives conservatives additional evidence that the hard-Left places nothing, including human life, above the realization of its political agenda – and that nothing inspires the lamest of leftist apologies except incontrovertible proof and international publicity of malfeasance. As if we needed it.



ENDNOTES:

1. Since it’s so rarely stated, Helms prefaced his oft-quoted statement with a story about a recently defeated Southern sheriff who “had this big fella with him, about 6 foot 7 and 270 pounds. Somebody asked, ‘Who’s that?’ The sheriff answered, ‘Anybody who can’t get more votes than I did better have a bodyguard.’”
 
Macfistowannabe said:


This Wednesday, Rhodes offered a leftist apology – an expression of regret, all the while denying personal culpability and stating any wrongdoing is dwarfed by the sheer evil embodied by her political opponents She said:



There is nothing "leftist" about this apology. Most people don't admit that they are wrong, all sides of the political spectrum do this (meaning this type of "apology") all of the time.
 
on wednesday i heard her show and she did offer much more of an apology than that...she said that she was wrong. but she did mention an ann coulter quote, "The only question now is, whether we impeach him (Clinton) or assasinate him." Nothing was ever said about that....i believe that both rhodes and coulter are annoying
 
fantastic...most people who make a living spewing forth "blah, blah, blahs" are annoying...what really irks me is that often in the media if we don't like someone who happens to be a female we talk about her like a whore...rhodes has done this to coulter and i think that that is really messed up....on the other hand, how can coulter get away with saying that the only problem she has with Timothy McVey is that he didn't blow up the NY Times building?
 
really, assasinating bush would be a waste of time.. and it would get no one nowhere. who would we get then? DICK CHENEY. are you kidding me?


also, the liberal crowd (except deep, i guess :wink: ) seems to be far less armed than the gung ho republicans, so i dont really see how they could pull it off anyway.

also, the guy who wrote the article is quite the right winger, so i dont put much weight in anything he has to say. saying 'adulterer-in-chief' with the 'war mongering idiot-in-chief' are equally wrong is simply laughable. no one ever assasinated a political figure cause he was cheating on his wife. when sending the young men and women of the country to a meaningless death is concerned, the emotions would run more strongly.

'war is the choice of the chosen few who will not have to fight.'

'i am sick of old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in'
 
This is completely f:censored:d up. You don't solve problems with violence, you solve them with peaceful action. I can't believe they actually put this crud on the air.
 
all_i_want said:
really, assasinating bush would be a waste of time.. and it would get no one nowhere. who would we get then? DICK CHENEY. are you kidding me?
They'd rather hear a balding fat guy with a heart problem mumbling than a speech-impaired monkey. Kind of surprising, because liberals are more fond of Peta.

all_i_want said:
also, the liberal crowd (except deep, i guess :wink: ) seems to be far less armed than the gung ho republicans, so i dont really see how they could pull it off anyway.
Liberals with guns? It can't escape the fact that there's a Bush and a Dick in the White House. They don't like that kind of thing. What can I say, you have to protect yourself from such people.

all_i_want said:
also, the guy who wrote the article is quite the right winger, so i dont put much weight in anything he has to say. saying 'adulterer-in-chief' with the 'war mongering idiot-in-chief' are equally wrong is simply laughable. no one ever assasinated a political figure cause he was cheating on his wife. when sending the young men and women of the country to a meaningless death is concerned, the emotions would run more strongly.
Anyone realizes this was written by a right-winger. Correct me if I'm wrong, but someone did try to assassinate Billy Jeff if I have my facts straight - although I doubt it was over his ever-productive meetings with that certain intern. I got a kick out of "adulterer-in-chief", and I'm not going to bother defending big old Billy Jeff by saying he did nothing to earn that label.

Top of the morning to you... :wave:

I got maybe 3 hours of sleep. I posted a thread that linked to a site about some nut in New York who believes that all soldiers are scumbags and praises every injury and death, except that they are funded by tax-payers instead of their bodies left out to rot. A certain somebody pointed the finger at the US with more hatred and irrationality than the site itself.

I'm thinking of going back to bed. :hmm:
 
blueyedpoet said:
on the other hand, how can coulter get away with saying that the only problem she has with Timothy McVey is that he didn't blow up the NY Times building?
I don't think she should get away with that. Her appalling lack of humanity is easily her least appealing characteristic.
 
Irvine511 said:
i've read this thread twice and i have no idea what's going on.
From Air America:

A spoiled child is telling us our Social Security isn’t safe anymore, so he is going to fix it for us. Well, here’s your answer, you ungrateful whelp: [audio sound of 4 gunshots being fired.] Just try it, you little bastard. [audio of gun being cocked].

Rhodes then giggled when the spot finished playing. Upon hearing a transcript, White House spokesman Scott McClellan reportedly called the incident “very inappropriate and over the line.”
 
you should be ashamed of making me do this :ohmy:

"I'd make a better U.S. President than George Bush. Bush is an idiot. I'm a better public speaker than him. It makes you wonder about the voters."
--robbie williams

i mean.. yeah... if he says so.. i guess.. it could be true, right? i mean, as far as we know, the guy is at least more honest than bush, as we can see below:

"When it comes down to it, I just like taking my pants down."
-robbie williams
 
Hey...Air America is the leftist counter to right-wing radio. Expect it to be as histrionic as right-wing radio on purpose, because you know what? Reasoned, rational, intelligent responses get no attention. After all, NPR rarely gets editorials like this, now does it?

The 2004 election proved that the more hysterical you are, the more votes you get. And the Democrats are finally learning how to be hysterical after years of trying the "high road." So one radio personality goes too far; that's expected and unfortunate. But let's look at right-wing radio's record on Bill Clinton, and I'm sure you'd find a similar track record.

Melon
 
ah, yes. in the Clinton years, wasn't G. Gordon Liddy (Watergate felon) encouraging his listeners to shoot federal agents in the head? because they wear bullet-proof vests, but not helmets.
 
all_i_want said:
you should be ashamed of making me do this :ohmy:

"I'd make a better U.S. President than George Bush. Bush is an idiot. I'm a better public speaker than him. It makes you wonder about the voters."
--robbie williams

i mean.. yeah... if he says so.. i guess.. it could be true, right? i mean, as far as we know, the guy is at least more honest than bush, as we can see below:

"When it comes down to it, I just like taking my pants down."
-robbie williams
I'm ashamed of the fact that anyone sees a clown like Robbie Williams as a political spokesperson. And for my comments about there being a Bush and a Dick in the White House I apologize. It was early in the morning, and I generally sound like a liberal when it's too early to think straight.

:wink:
 
Macfistowannabe said:
And for my comments about there being a Bush and a Dick in the White House I apologize. It was early in the morning, and I generally sound like a liberal when it's too early to think straight.

Apology not accepted. :wink:
 
Macfistowannabe said:
And for my comments about there being a Bush and a Dick in the White House I apologize. It was early in the morning, and I generally sound like a liberal when it's too early to think straight.

:wink:



if you were really a liberal, you would have said "a Dick and a Dick" or "a Bush and a Bush."

you know liberals *never* think "straight."

;)
 
Aren't we assuming the worst about the audio clip?

I can listen to the description given on this thread and think it was meant to support the killing of old people, so we wouldn't have to support really old, really sick people. Couldn't that be an explanation?
 
Macfistowannabe said:
I'm ashamed of the fact that anyone sees a clown like Robbie Williams as a political spokesperson.

:wink:

well.. yes :tsk:

thats sort of the point. the guy is right though, he would make a better president. on the other hand, who wouldnt?

the whole affair is shameful, for bush, really.

:wink:
 
I think Bush is a crummy president, but I wouldn't vote for Robbie Williams if he ran against him. Of course he can't since he's a British subject.
 
all_i_want said:


well.. yes :tsk:

thats sort of the point. the guy is right though, he would make a better president. on the other hand, who wouldnt?

the whole affair is shameful, for bush, really.

:wink:
I hope you weren't attempting a CONVINCING argument with this post. :wink: If Kerry couldn't beat Bush, there's no way in the seventh circle of hell that some celebrity clownball can do any better. Robbie Williams is about as convincing as Mary Carey. What do you know, even 99% California didn't vote for her. :ohmy:
 
Back
Top Bottom