Acting like Democrats...

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Diemen said:
:yawn:

And this is supposed to produce meaningful dialogue how?

Yeah....................:wink: Joe Lieberman just plain shot himself in the foot. It's that simple. The real winners of that election were the people of Connecticut. We're going to win in November.
 
What You Need To Believe To Be A Republican:

Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals,
Arabs, and Hillary Clinton.

Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney and Rumsfeld did business with him, and a bad guy when Bush couldn't find Bin Laden.

Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is Communist,
but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony.

The United States should get out of the United Nations, and
our highest national priority is enforcing U.N. resolutions
against Iraq.

A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body,
but multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all
mankind without regulation.

The best way to improve military morale is to praise the
troops in speeches, while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay.

If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won't have
sex.

A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle and antagonize
our long-time allies, then demand their cooperation and money.

Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy, but
providing health care to all Americans is socialism.

HMOs and insurance companies have the best interests of the
public at heart.

Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science,
but creationism should be taught in schools.

A president lying about an extramarital affair is a
impeachable offense, but a president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy.

Government should limit itself to the powers named in the
Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and
censoring the Internet.

The public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades,
but George Bush's and Dick Cheney's driving records are none of
our business.

Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless
you're a conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers for your recovery.

Supporting "Executive Privilege" is imperative for every
Republican ever born, who will be born or who might be born ( in
perpetuity.)

What Bill Clinton did in the 1960s is of vital national
interest, but what Bush did in the '80s is irrelevant.

There's nothing wrong with supporting drunken hunters who
shoot their friends and blaming the friends for looking too much like quail.

:ohmy:

:wink:
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Once again Diamond, you bring so much to the table.:|

I think what Diamod posted is every bit as meaningful as "Conservative Republicans are whackos" and "Conservative Christians are scary" and "half of Americans [the half that think Saddam had WMD at the time of the invasion] are stupid", wouldn't you agree?
 
80sU2isBest said:


I think what Diamod posted is every bit as meaningful as "Conservative Republicans are whackos" and "Conservative Christians are scary" and "half of Americans [the half that think Saddam had WMD at the time of the invasion] are stupid", wouldn't you agree?

Were those threads? No, they were just entries by individuals within threads.

If someone had started a thread that way, and that individual is known for making asanine threads and comments and never really contributing, I'd call them out the same way.:|
 
I really don't want to perpetuate this, but wtf is going on here? Now you're going to bring up peoples' user names diamond? I think we can all attempt to interact on a much higher level than that, and that includes you diamond.

Anyway, I think that's Bob Hope. Who are the other people in the video? I like her dress, it's pretty. Dresses were so pretty back then.
 
:ohmy:

yes that is bob hope and the dresses were pretty back then.

don't know about the other perps.:wink:
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


Were those threads? No, they were just entries by individuals within threads.

If someone had started a thread that way, and that individual is known for making asanine threads and comments and never really contributing, I'd call them out the same way.:|
Is this really the first stupid thread you've ever seen?
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


What fair-minded question are you talking about? 80's?

If so I answered that.

What I asked you was if you would agree that what Diamond posted was as meaningful as "Conservative Republicans are whackos" and "Conservative Christians are scary" and "half of Americans [the half that think Saddam had WMD at the time of the invasion] are stupid". You never answered that.
 
80sU2isBest said:


What I asked you was if you would agree that what Diamond posted was as meaningful as "Conservative Republicans are whackos" and "Conservative Christians are scary" and "half of Americans [the half that think Saddam had WMD at the time of the invasion] are stupid". You never answered that.

I'll say it again. Show me what part didn't I answer.

"Were those threads? No, they were just entries by individuals within threads.

If someone had started a thread that way, and that individual is known for making asanine threads and comments and never really contributing, I'd call them out the same way."

So yes if someone started threads with those comments and that was the only content, and this was their continual behaivor, I would do the same thing.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


I'll say it again. Show me what part didn't I answer.

"Were those threads? No, they were just entries by individuals within threads.

If someone had started a thread that way, and that individual is known for making asanine threads and comments and never really contributing, I'd call them out the same way."

So yes if someone started threads with those comments and that was the only content, and this was their continual behaivor, I would do the same thing.

What part you didn't answer? You didn't answer any of it.

I didn't ask you "why are you calling him out" or even anything about you calling them out at all.

I simply asked you if you agreed that Diamond's post was meaningful as those others.
 
80sU2isBest said:


What part you didn't answer? You didn't answer any of it.

I didn't ask you "why are you calling him out" or even anything about you calling them out at all.

I simply asked you if you agreed that Diamond's post was meaningful as those others.

I'm sorry if I didn't make it black and white, but yes they are all just as meaningless. I thought that I made that clear when I said I would do the same thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom