LemonMelon
More 5G Than Man
deep said:
Are you against the morning after pill?
No, because at that point the woman has no knowledge of whether or not she is actually pregnant.
deep said:
Are you against the morning after pill?
Justin24 said:
Rent Nova's The Miracle of life on video.
Life isn't sacred, we eat animals all the time, and as soon as our brains shut down were just meat.LemonMelon said:
Interesting question.
I would personally consider anything animated (re: growing, moving) to have life in it. (However, I would exclude plantlife from this) A fetus is growing, changing, and has certain genetic characteristics imprinted in it from conception. That's why I consider it life.
A_Wanderer said:Life isn't sacred, we eat animals all the time, and as soon as our brains shut down were just meat.
anitram said:
That fetus is not a child and there is some kind of embryologist out there that will support this claim?
randhail said:
It's cells dividing - making it life - nonliving things don't do this. I'm well aware of how many embryos never implant, but they're still dividing, living cells.
LemonMelon said:
1. Using abortion as birth control is wrong. This is a horrible thing. If the mother was too irresponsible to use birth control before sex (which I know does not work 100% of the time, but still) she deserves to deal with the pain of birthing a baby.
2. If a woman is raped, the situation is split in my mind. Personally, I think she should go through with having the child and if she can't deal with it, put it up for adoption so someone else can give the child love. If she aborts, however, I understand why she would, but I would have to say she made the wrong choice.
3. If the woman's life is in danger by going through with childbirth, the baby should be aborted. It hurts me to say that, but as I said before, a mother's life has greater weight in my eyes than a fetus's does.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Just link me one for goodness sake.
I guarantee you they will all be from pro-life sites and little to no true reference. The fact I told you before is just one reason. No scienctist in their right mind would consider conception the beginning of life.
deep said:
noooooooooooooo
it goes like this
life begins at conception
that is the mantra
LemonMelon said:
No, because at that point the woman has no knowledge of whether or not she is actually pregnant.
dazzlingamy said:so lets just agree to disagree
anitram said:
Seems to me a lot of people think the mantra is:
LIFE begins at conception
Except after rape, then it's something other than life.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Well how do we mourn for all these lost "lives"? Does that make god the ultimate abortionist?
Come on!!!
BonoVoxSupastar said:
So it's only wrong when it's a conscience effort?
80sU2isBest said:
That's not my mantra.
80sU2isBest said:
Here's one, from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-embryology.htm
(good luck calling that a "prolife" site...)
"Part of the problem lies within each embryology textbook. They all state that life begins at the moment of conception. While it is true that some form of life begins at conception, the degree, value and quality of such a life is not addressed."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's more, from
from http://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html
Yes, I know you'll balk at the word "prolife" in the URL path, but look past that at the quotes contained therein. And there's many many more form other web sites.
"Development of the embryo begins at Stage 1 when a sperm fertilizes an oocyte and together they form a zygote."
[England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
deep said:
When does the life of an apple tree begin?
LemonMelon said:
All I'm saying is I don't blame anyone for using birth control, and I have nothing personally against it. "Birth control" is for just that; to make sure you won't have to abort or go full term for a baby you didn't even want.
Actually, many embryologists think that "personhood" begins at conception, also.dazzlingamy said:So embreyologists and scientists think life begins at conception, well nah fucking dah. But "life" doesn't mean "person" it means living - like so many other things that are "living" but not conscious.
CTU2fan said:Is stabbing a pregnant woman in the belly & killing her unborn child murder? People have been tried & convicted of murder in that case.
So wanted fetuses are LIFE, but unwanted ones are not?
CTU2fan said:Is stabbing a pregnant woman in the belly & killing her unborn child murder? People have been tried & convicted of murder in that case.
So wanted fetuses are LIFE, but unwanted ones are not?
randhail said:
Depending on your point of view, yes it does. I don't view it that way however. For me, every embryo is living - you can't argue that it's not living. You can argue that it's not "human life" because it doesn't fit our definitions, but it certainly is living.
Knowing everything that can go wrong in development, it makes you truly appreciate what a miracle life really is.
deep said:
So 80s
life begins at conception
and the life of an apple tree begins when a seed is placed in soil, watered and the seed begins to germinate.
at the beginning stage of germination it is not an apple tree
it has the potential to grow into an apple tree
and yes apple tree life begins at germination
BonoVoxSupastar said:
But didn't you say life begins at conception? Do you know what the morning after pill does?
80sU2isBest said:
Actually, many embryologists think that "personhood" begins at conception, also.