A blatantly false assertions? - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-28-2004, 08:52 PM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
nbcrusader's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 11:46 AM
A blatantly false assertions?

The conventional wisdom for the last year was that there was absolutely no connection between Saddam and al Qaeda - usually offered to invalidate a basis for the Iraqi war.

Seem more evidence of a connection exists

And on it goes. This conventional wisdom--that our two most determined enemies were not in league, now or ever--is comforting. It is also wrong.

In late February 2004, Christopher Carney made an astonishing discovery. Carney, a political science professor from Pennsylvania on leave to work at the Pentagon, was poring over a list of officers in Saddam Hussein's much-feared security force, the Fedayeen Saddam. One name stood out: Lieutenant Colonel Ahmed Hikmat Shakir. The name was not spelled exactly as Carney had seen it before, but such discrepancies are common. Having studied the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda for 18 months, he immediately recognized the potential significance of his find. According to a report last week in the Wall Street Journal, Shakir appears on three different lists of Fedayeen officers.

nbcrusader is offline  
Old 05-28-2004, 10:30 PM   #2
love, blood, life
melon's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,782
Local Time: 03:46 PM
I find it doubtful. Bin Laden hated Saddam for running a secular government, so it would not have been to Saddam's benefit to support Al Qaeda. Shakir may have been part of Al Qaeda on his own. It appears that, in the dying years of Saddam's Iraq, he was just surrounded by "yes men" who told him what he wanted to hear, while many just did what they pleased.

It would not logically add up for Saddam and bin Laden to be friends, knowing bin Laden's known negative attitude against Saddam's secular Baathist government.


melon is offline  
Old 05-29-2004, 12:32 AM   #3
love, blood, life
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 02:46 PM
What if Hypothetically Bin Laden had people infiltrating Saddam's forces? Is it possible we are now misreading things or are we still hoping.

This is not enough to convince me Saddam was involved in 9/11. I am convinced Bin Laden would have loved to see Saddam go.
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 05-29-2004, 09:59 AM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
verte76's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 07:46 PM
I think quite possibly some people who happened to be Al-Qaeda were hanging out with Saddam, since he favored Sunni Muslims. I don't think Saddam and bin Laden were allies, however, since bin Laden hated Saddam because he was too "secular". In the Islamic world Islamic militants and secular-oriented leaders hate each other. It's a strange mix.
verte76 is offline  
Old 05-29-2004, 12:35 PM   #5
New Yorker
Sherry Darling's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,857
Local Time: 03:46 PM
I agree Dread and Verte. There is really not much evidence here, and the Weekly Standard (NBC's source) several times in the past has headlined "Case Closed" on the Saddam/9-11 link, but when you read the actual article, no such specific claim was made. No wonder so many folks believe there was a connection, and to the White House for behaving as if there was one. I agree, too, that the ME prolly wasn't big enough for both Saddam and UBL.

Sherry Darling is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com