LuckyNumber7
Blue Crack Addict
Left the debate thinking, if this were 2012 or any election year before it, Clinton won by a rather large margin. In this particular year, I thought she edged out a victory, and I anticipated a 1-3 point bump in the polls.
I learned my lesson about expecting the masses to judge Trump's debating style in the same way I do in the primaries, though.
2016 presidential debate snap polls show Trump beating Hillary Clinton by a landslide | Daily Mail Online
As these are online, and therefore unscientific, polls, take with a grain of salt. But they still say something, I suppose
Any poll, or sample, done anywhere says something, typically.
On the Internet, it's just harder to achieve simple random sampling. Or some other type of statistical random sampling. Because there's no real way or pseudo-way to randomly access people. Everything on the Internet tends to either have a very strong bias, or a very ineffective ability to reach a diverse audience.