2016 US Presidential Election Thread - VII - Page 7 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-31-2016, 10:42 AM   #121
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hi, Violet
Posts: 10,253
Local Time: 01:05 PM
If Sanders is even close in New York, this could remain interesting.
__________________

Kieran McConville is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 11:07 AM   #122
Blue Crack Addict
 
prbiker15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 16,030
Local Time: 11:05 PM
2016 US Presidential Election Thread - VII

I also think that the chances of Bernie clinching the nomination are starting to get really slim. If he doesn't turn out to be the nominee, I'll gladly support Hillary.
__________________

prbiker15 is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 11:19 AM   #123
Blue Crack Addict
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the killerwhaletank
Posts: 23,075
Local Time: 10:05 PM
Why is the only option to pay for health care drastically raising taxes anyways?

There will never be another grand-army conventional war. Cutting the defense budget could easily pay for universal health care, or at least enough that the cost to the individual tax payer would be relatively low. It's insane that any country feels the need to maintain such a ridiculously overpowered military for no good reason.
DaveC is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 11:36 AM   #124
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 4,144
Local Time: 10:05 PM
Our allies should start contributing more to their own defense budgets so we aren't the World's Rent A Cops. Then again empowering certain actors in the Far East could lead to greater instability. Cutting the military budget to pay for Social programs sounds attractive on paper but has far reaching implications.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Oregoropa is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 11:37 AM   #125
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
BEAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7,337
Local Time: 03:05 AM
Agree. Think of what we could do just lowering the military expense by 25%

Surely we can still be safe


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
BEAL is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 11:49 AM   #126
Blue Crack Addict
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the killerwhaletank
Posts: 23,075
Local Time: 10:05 PM
A 25% cut would still leave the United States with more than double the defense budget of China.

$150 billion free to spend on Americans (theoretically).
DaveC is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 01:06 PM   #127
Forum Administrator
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: With the other morally corrupt bootlicking rubes.
Posts: 75,159
Local Time: 10:05 PM
Bingo. Let's start with getting our spending under control and get the most bang for our buck. Let's also work to close corporate loopholes and regulations on certain segments of financial industry who have gone unchecked.

Then, and only then, should we start talking about significant tax increases on the middle and upper middle class.
Headache in a Suitcase is online now  
Old 03-31-2016, 02:48 PM   #128
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 4,144
Local Time: 10:05 PM
Don't touch taxing the middle class as a whole right now. I know many people who haven't seen a raise in the past 5 years. Wages are stagnant. Health premiums keep shooting up. I know Bernie prefers a Scandinavian model of social spending. I think it's easier for those countries who's populations are under 10 million to get on board with and implement that spending regime. If the USA was 50 different countries I could see New England and Washington state able to pull it off.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Oregoropa is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 03:36 PM   #129
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,603
Local Time: 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveC View Post
A 25% cut would still leave the United States with more than double the defense budget of China.

$150 billion free to spend on Americans (theoretically).
'


China defense planning includes losing 30 per cent of their population as they ramp up eventually win the war. It's a good plan.
deep is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 03:40 PM   #130
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mack_Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: definitely Osaka
Posts: 7,124
Local Time: 10:05 PM
what's up?

Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
'


China defense planning includes losing 30 per cent of their population as they ramp up eventually win the war. It's a good plan.
hi deepster.
Mack_Again is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 05:18 PM   #131
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the West Coast
Posts: 34,470
Local Time: 11:05 PM
i swear i'm going to throw my computer out the window if i have to witness one more dumbshit argument between Bernie Bros and Clintonistas on FB.
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 05:33 PM   #132
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 64,498
Local Time: 08:05 PM
I had my first one (in my own FB post) last night! My Hilary supporting friend was civil and kept his cool. My Bernie supporting acquaintance was kind of a dick about it.

Like, way to keep that stereotype going.
corianderstem is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 05:45 PM   #133
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the West Coast
Posts: 34,470
Local Time: 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
I had my first one (in my own FB post) last night! My Hilary supporting friend was civil and kept his cool. My Bernie supporting acquaintance was kind of a dick about it.

Like, way to keep that stereotype going.


i feel like the Hillary folk hate the Sanders folk, whereas the Sanders folk hate Hillary.

as Sinead O'Conner once said: "fight the real enemy."

Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 05:50 PM   #134
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the West Coast
Posts: 34,470
Local Time: 11:05 PM
but take heart. our next president will not be Donald Trump.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ven-white-men/
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 06:12 PM   #135
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 20,774
Local Time: 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
as Sinead O'Conner once said: "fight the real enemy."
This. With the Republican Party imploding as it is right now, this is a great opportunity for the Democrats to show solidarity and try and combine the best of both Bernie and Hilary's messages into something worth voting for. If we want to have another Democratic president, we need to not be at each other's throats.

Obviously there's stuff worth criticizing in both Bernie and Hilary's campaigns or messages, and I appreciate that we're willing to have that discussion, and are actually thinking about what they have to say and offer. But in my eyes, that just means fans of one candidate have a great opportunity to go to events for the other and ask things like, "So what do you think about x or y issue? How would you address this or that situation? What's your plan to help _____ (insert whatever group of people you feel deserves a lot of focus here)" And so on. It doesn't have to be an either/or situation.

I get being upset if your favorite candidate doesn't get the nomination, but I don't get the refusal some people have to support the person who wins it instead. Considering who we're up against on the GOP side, we need as much support as we can get.
Moonlit_Angel is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 07:37 PM   #136
New Yorker
 
Bluer White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,668
Local Time: 10:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitize View Post
I would hazard a guess that the people in this thread who are worried about taxes are also probably not terribly insecure on the health insurance front.

I would also hazard a guess, for the upper middle class, a Bernie-like tax plan would be pretty unambiguously negative. That's not an argument that such a plan is necessarily bad, but it is an argument that a major segment of the American population that at least doesn't feel like it has a ton of extra disposable income would be hit in a noticeable way.
Great thoughts, digit.

My guess is that we all recognize tax rates need to be adjusted periodically. And every class, from fast food employees hoping for 15 bucks per hour, to the trendy upper middle class homes bringing in 225K+, to the millionaires and up....they all have very "nuanced" positions as to why their rates shouldn't be increasing much. It's a healthy discussion to have and Sanders is sparking it.
Bluer White is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 08:21 PM   #137
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hi, Violet
Posts: 10,253
Local Time: 01:05 PM
No mention of his proposed tax on financial transactions of the Wall Street variety. At a fraction of the rate of existing sales taxes (which it would be analogous to), that alone would help significantly in funding such things as university tuition. In the hypothetical future world where such things became law.
Kieran McConville is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 08:28 PM   #138
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mack_Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: definitely Osaka
Posts: 7,124
Local Time: 10:05 PM
I thought his tax pal would tax high frequency/high risk trades on the stock market. and that'll fund shit tons of money for his plans.
Mack_Again is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 09:54 PM   #139
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,603
Local Time: 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlit_Angel View Post
This. With the Republican Party imploding as it is right now, this is a great opportunity for the Democrats .
you can stop right there and add, and a decent chance to pick up? the senate (that will advise and consent)
deep is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 09:57 PM   #140
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,603
Local Time: 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack_Again View Post
I thought his tax pal would tax high frequency/high risk trades on the stock market. and that'll fund shit tons of money for his plans.
a tax pal? is this a socialist concept?
__________________

deep is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×