2016 US Presidential Election Pt. IV

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I really don't understand all the glee about Trump being a loser (well, ok, I do, he's an unbearable oaf) without acknowledgment that Ted Cruz is far, far worse. He's a true believer.

But I guess none of that matters now that the powers that be have annointed Rubio, who will look like a geeky 3rd grader debating Hillary Clinton.
 
The Electability Spin Machine | Rolling Stone

The most substantial claim is that Bernie Sanders has some fans on the Internet who are assholes. Which puts him in exclusive company with literally everything. The same thinkfluencers who argue that Bernie Sanders needs to take personal responsibility for people he's never met being rude to journalists on the Internet (who are already berated and ridiculed by fans of everything else) are also filling column inches by doing the human-dignity equivalent of reaching a whole arm through a buzzing garbage disposal to latch onto yet another slime-slicked take festering in the U-bend and explaining why Hillary Clinton does not need to explain anything further. She doesn't need to justify that Iraq War vote again, or the destabilization of Libya, or that desire to go hog wild in Syria, or that 1990s support for welfare reform that hit women hardest, or those 1990s tough-on-crime policies she endorsed along with private prisons, or those speaking fees at Goldman Sachs or that opposition to reinstating Glass-Steagall.

[...]

This is the dim path where a career pro-gay-rights feminist looms as a misogynist and an enemy to identity politics because some people with egg avatars sent some tweets. Where a candidate who personally earned millions in speeches and whose campaigns were significantly funded by Wall Street firms that nearly broke the world is equivalent to the candidate whose whole campaign opposes them because, apparently, he took money from a nurses' union. Where a legitimate candidate of the working class will be hammered over and over in an authenticity battle with a campaign that weekly releases some "How do you do, fellow kids?" embarrassment and whose Instagram manager is a woman with her own HBO series. Where the real progressive candidate has already pledged not to raise any middle-class taxes and once called people on welfare deadbeats.
 
I though that the substantial claim against Bernie Sanders is that his ideas bend too far to the left for some of his own party, let alone that any Republican in Congress will ever vote for anything he puts forward?
 
I though that the substantial claim against Bernie Sanders is that his ideas bend too far to the left for some of his own party, let alone that any Republican in Congress will ever vote for anything he puts forward?

That's pretty much the gist of it. But alas, some will spin anything to match their argument.
 
I really don't understand all the glee about Trump being a loser (well, ok, I do, he's an unbearable oaf) without acknowledgment that Ted Cruz is far, far worse. He's a true believer.


True, but for me it's the hypocrisy factor. Cruz' supporters, as uninformed as they are, are at least consistent and "principled" in their beliefs. Trump just representatives the racist hypocrites that called ACA socialism but now support someone who wants a single payer solution, and scream religious freedom but want Muslims monitored?!


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
I though that the substantial claim against Bernie Sanders is that his ideas bend too far to the left for some of his own party, let alone that any Republican in Congress will ever vote for anything he puts forward?
Well, there's greater context to what the "substantial claim" is in that article, which is more about how the campaigns were talking about one another in Iowa as opposed to the broader picture that you are talking about. But you are correct. There's a reason Clinton keeps saying "I get things done." The implication is that Sanders cannot because every idea he presents will be summarily dismissed due to his leftist leanings.

But again, my point is more about Clinton than it is about Sanders. Everyone keeps getting swept up in talking about what each candidate symbolizes. But for someone who spends so much time harping on her record and experience, very few people seem interested in actually talking about Clinton's record and experience. Painting her as the more centrist alternative to Sanders and thus the more electable option for the Democrats is an awfully friendly depiction of what she actually seems to be.
 
Last edited:
Hillary is actually not a very good candidate. She's highly unlikeable, has questionable ethics, and her experience and track record is incredibly overstated.

That she's even in a dog race with an actual socialist says more about her than it does about Sanders or the party.

I have to think Biden is kicking himself for not jumping in.
 
I really don't understand all the glee about Trump being a loser (well, ok, I do, he's an unbearable oaf) without acknowledgment that Ted Cruz is far, far worse. He's a true believer.


THANK YOU.

As bad as TRUMP! is, and oh boy.....anyway as bad as he is Ted Cruz666 is probably one thousand times worse. He is much much much much much much much much much much worse.

Also, it's only Iowa. Some people are acting like TRUMP! has lost the GOP nomination. He really wasn't supposed to win Iowa anyway was he? The evangelical candidates were always polling higher until very very recently when he pulled ahead, albeit not by much. Iowa hasn't picked the GOP nominee since when...Reagan? Bush?

I am starting to think that with Hillary being vulnerable the GOP could win. For that reason, i am terrified about some of these prospects. Most of the establishment guys don't terrify me so badly, but Cruz would our ultimate demise. Far worse than even a Huckabee or Santorum! I don't think there are even appropriate words available for me to describe the absolute HORROR it would be for us (and the ROW) if this awful mistake were to be elected. Let's not lose sight of that here.

Go Sanders/Clinton!!
 
Hillary is actually not a very good candidate. She's highly unlikeable, has questionable ethics, and her experience and track record is incredibly overstated.

That she's even in a dog race with an actual socialist says more about her than it does about Sanders or the party.

I have to think Biden is kicking himself for not jumping in.


:up:


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Not for nothing, but the idea that in the year 2016 we’re deciding who gets to run for the most powerful position in the western world by having people stand in groups in a gym, and/or folded slips of paper is fucking frightening.



I actually did it when I lived in Nevada in 2012. I thought it was a fun democratic exercise. You got to see live human beings express their views. Make friends with people in your neighborhood. Beats arguing with trolls on non-FYM Internet comment sections before going to vote on Election Day.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Not for nothing, but the idea that in the year 2016 we’re deciding who gets to run for the most powerful position in the western world by having people stand in groups in a gym, and/or folded slips of paper is fucking frightening.
That's right Iowa Hawkeye cauci is irrelevant, every once in awhile this blind pig finds an acorn, not this time.
Trump is hardly out of the picture.
Bernie can win two more states where white socialists makeup the democratic vote, that's it.
 
Last edited:
I actually did it whelctionsen I lived in Nevada in 2012. I thought it was a fun democratic exercise. You got to see live human beings express their views. Make friends with people in your neighborhood. Beats arguing with trolls on non-FYM Internet comment sections before going to vote on Election Day.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

cauci are not a true representations of elections, where people fill out a ballot in privacy and then are done. the participation is always much less that an election,

sure it can be fun, so are 'no pants' parties
 
When talking about how awful Cruz is, it should also be noted that he wears two watches. Both wrists have a watch. This guy's fucking out of his mind.

CaJyEViUMAAMB6u.jpg
 
THANK YOU.

As bad as TRUMP! is, and oh boy.....anyway as bad as he is Ted Cruz666 is probably one thousand times worse. He is much much much much much much much much much much worse.

Also, it's only Iowa. Some people are acting like TRUMP! has lost the GOP nomination. He really wasn't supposed to win Iowa anyway was he? The evangelical candidates were always polling higher until very very recently when he pulled ahead, albeit not by much. Iowa hasn't picked the GOP nominee since when...Reagan? Bush?

I am starting to think that with Hillary being vulnerable the GOP could win. For that reason, i am terrified about some of these prospects. Most of the establishment guys don't terrify me so badly, but Cruz would our ultimate demise. Far worse than even a Huckabee or Santorum! I don't think there are even appropriate words available for me to describe the absolute HORROR it would be for us (and the ROW) if this awful mistake were to be elected. Let's not lose sight of that here.

Go Sanders/Clinton!!

Trump is a troll, but Cruz is truly a despicable human being.

That said... There is a history of despicable Evangelicals winning Iowa and then flaming out. So Cruz winning is not as big a deal as if ClownCar McOrangeFace had won.
 
Hillary is actually not a very good candidate. She's highly unlikeable, has questionable ethics, and her experience and track record is incredibly overstated.

That she's even in a dog race with an actual socialist says more about her than it does about Sanders or the party.

I have to think Biden is kicking himself for not jumping in.

The Democratic party is kicking themselves for not having a reasonable viable national candidate under the age of 65.

May be 08 in reverse this time with a younger more vital candidate like Rubio beating a tired war horse like Hillary.
 
When talking about how awful Cruz is, it should also be noted that he wears two watches. Both wrists have a watch. This guy's fucking out of his mind.

CaJyEViUMAAMB6u.jpg

just use phone to look up time. he should realize that fact that phone is much more accurate and convenient.
 
When talking about how awful Cruz is, it should also be noted that he wears two watches. Both wrists have a watch. This guy's fucking out of his mind.

CaJyEViUMAAMB6u.jpg

Aside from the 2 watches, he just doesn't look right in flannel.

Makes his face seem even more punchable.
 
the one on the right is mostly likely a fitness tracker wristband.

they're great, I can do five miles without leaving my couch
 
Last edited:
and if this is true??

Carson accuses Cruz camp of spreading false rumors on campaign suspension | Fox News


and it could be, the nature of cauci, one could steal a few per centage points from Carson that would have put Cruz from two, up to number one and even have added to Rubio's numbers, that said the polling may have been correct if this was a conventional primary election and not a weird ass thing where a bunch of people get in a room and could have been lied to to change their vote.
 
Hillary is actually not a very good candidate. She's highly unlikeable, has questionable ethics, and her experience and track record is incredibly overstated.

That she's even in a dog race with an actual socialist says more about her than it does about Sanders or the party.

I have to think Biden is kicking himself for not jumping in.


Indeed, sadly. It irks me to be supporting her, but I am, because Bernie is way to the left of what I'm comfortable with, and the Republicans are all nutjobs.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Cruz appears to be getting dirty on his campaign, much like Dubya did in 2000. This is terrible news. I sincerely believe Donald Trump would make a better president than Ted Cruz. That's a scary thought. I hate Marco Rubio, but anything on the right over Ted is crucial.

As far as Clinton/Sanders goes, after continuing to read into Clinton's shadiness... I just can't do it. I wasn't going to register for a primary vote since I'm in a closed state, but I think I will now, for Sanders.
 
Trump is a troll, but Cruz is truly a despicable human being.

That said... There is a history of despicable Evangelicals winning Iowa and then flaming out. So Cruz winning is not as big a deal as if ClownCar McOrangeFace had won.

I am still going with the idea that Hillary's vulnerabilities could help the GOP win this....therefore im hoping whatever the GOP nominates is the least despicable pile of shit of the bunch. Currently i have to say that is TRUMP! since the non-despicable bunch (Jeb! Kasich, Christie, or Paul) really don't have much of a chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom