2016 US Presidential Election Pt. III

[bono_212]

Yay! Not today, Satan.

[bobsaget77]

This paves the way for Jim Gilmore to make a deep run. That's who we'll all be talking about in the near future. Jim motherf*cking Gilmore.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[prbiker15]

Originally Posted by BoMac

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/firs...=tw-share&_r=0

Two down, many more to go.

[corianderstem]

Gosh, what a shame. I'll miss him so.

[Oregoropa]

Rogaine could have saved Walker

[Mrs. Garrison]

Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7

I'm arguing because I hate unnecessary insertions of bias in debate. Sorry if I can't read sarcasm from text, it's not always so obvious. And just because you're sarcastic, that doesn't necessarily explain what you were implying.

What are you even talking about...bias because i like Hillary? Seriously...that makes no sense whatsoever. I am as critical of her in this instance as anyone here, so unnecessary bias is a tad bit absurd.

It's obvious that you are arguing just for the sake of arguing.

If you didn't get the sarcasm in the carrier pigeon and drone comment, well, your on an island all by yourself. Enjoy!

[Mrs. Garrison]

Originally Posted by BoMac

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/firs...=tw-share&_r=0

good riddance to the soulless wonder. Don't let the door hit you on the way out prick!

Now i wonder which candidate will take his 6% or whatever it was he had.

[Oregoropa]

Goes to show that debates matter. There was a recent poll that showed his fall from grace to below 1%. Thinning the herd will be good for future debates. Here is a tracker over the past several months and you can see that Walker just evaporated.



There are a bunch of candidates on life support. Some of the kiddie table folks might stick around as they don't have a huge network of paid staffers to support.

[bobsaget77]

Originally Posted by Oregoropa

Goes to show that debates matter. There was a recent poll that showed his fall from grace to below 1%. Thinning the herd will be good for future debates. Here is a tracker over the past several months and you can see that Walker just evaporated.







There are a bunch of candidates on life support. Some of the kiddie table folks might stick around as they don't have a huge network of paid staffers to support.

Wow. Rubio had a huge jump in the polls.



Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Oregoropa]

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

Wow. Rubio had a huge jump in the polls.



Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

He had a strong debate performance. Wouldn't be surprised if he becomes the eventual nominee.

[LemonMelon]

Trump, Fiorina and Carson are the three most potentially harmful candidates, so of course they're at the top.

[bobsaget77]

Originally Posted by LemonMelon

Trump, Fiorina and Carson are the three most potentially harmful candidates, so of course they're at the top.

The three "non-politicians" who are, in fact, simply the best politicians of them all. Except for Carson, he's not really much of a politician. But Trump and Fiorina are much more of politicians than almost anyone on the stage imo.
I really need some pumpkin pie right now. Amirite?
Anyways, it's quite embarrassing how in seemingly every speech or interview, Trump is trying to appeal to the Veterans and Evangelicals.



Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[trojanchick99]

Hopefully for the nation, the crazy cancels itself out and the sane Republicans win out in the end.

[bobsaget77]

Originally Posted by trojanchick99

Hopefully for the nation, the crazy cancels itself out and the sane Republicans win out in the end.

Huckabee, Christie, and the ones who didn't even make the debate will be next. That'll bring the field down to 8.
Rubio, Trump, and Bush will be in it for the long haul. With Rubio eventually emerging as the winner.
Sadly, Kasich and Paul will continue to lag in the polls due to having too much common sense.
Carson and Fiorina will fizzle out.
And with Cruz, I really have no clue. He's a bit of a wild card.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[LuckyNumber7]

Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrison

What are you even talking about...bias because i like Hillary? Seriously...that makes no sense whatsoever. I am as critical of her in this instance as anyone here, so unnecessary bias is a tad bit absurd.



It's obvious that you are arguing just for the sake of arguing.



If you didn't get the sarcasm in the carrier pigeon and drone comment, well, your on an island all by yourself. Enjoy!

Jeez, what's your problem? Seriously? You act like I'm supposed to know your views. That's what you're missing here. You think I know that you're trying to be sarcastic, because I should just *know* instantaneously what you're thinking. It's totally inconceivable to you that someone who opposes Hillary Clinton (say, someone right wing?) might use such a comment as a metaphor for being critical?

You expect me to understand your viewpoints. Should I also know what you had for breakfast this morning? Of course you didn't have bacon, you're a vegetarian! I'm on that island all by myself believing you ate bacon.

The worst part about that post though is, despite the fact that you are getting mad at me for failing to decipher your humor, you tell me why I do what I do as though you *know* exactly what I think and why I chose to engage? Look how smug your message is. Really?

[Mrs. Garrison]

Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7

Jeez, what's your problem? Seriously? You act like I'm supposed to know your views. That's what you're missing here. You think I know that you're trying to be sarcastic, because I should just *know* instantaneously what you're thinking. It's totally inconceivable to you that someone who opposes Hillary Clinton (say, someone right wing?) might use such a comment as a metaphor for being critical?

Well...if you bothered to read my posts or had paid attention to these threads you would know. Perhaps you shouldn't have come in here half-cocked telling people "whats-what" and instead tried to understood what people were saying before you jumped in.

You expect me to understand your viewpoints.

Again, if you would have bothered to read what i have posted in here repeatedly, you would have known

Should I also know what you had for breakfast this morning? Of course you didn't have bacon, you're a vegetarian! I'm on that island all by myself believing you ate bacon.

Actually i did have bacon

The worst part about that post though is, despite the fact that you are getting mad at me for failing to decipher your humor, you tell me why I do what I do as though you *know* exactly what I think and why I chose to engage? Look how smug your message is. Really?

Who is mad? Certainly not me. Take care my friend

[LuckyNumber7]

Yeah, you were mad. So you acted like a dick, and you made me mad. That's how that works.

[Oregoropa]

Originally Posted by Mrs. Garrison

Well...if you bothered to read my posts or had paid attention to these threads you would know. Perhaps you shouldn't have come in here half-cocked telling people "whats-what" and instead tried to understood what people were saying before you jumped in.

[bobsaget77]

Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7

Yeah, you were mad. So you acted like a dick, and you made me mad. That's how that works.

Maybe in middle school


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[DaveC]

Hey guys, how about that jump Fiorina made in the last poll?