It's a U2 forum? It's not just FYM. If you put the Election Poll out there in every sub-forum from Lemonade Stand to PLEBA and everything in between, I think it was balance a little more, but not much more. Obama would still dominate.
The majority of U2 fans I know are Republicans .
Considering we're on a board for a band that espouses generally liberal beliefs itself, yes, maybe it's not an accident.
The majority of U2 fans I know are Republicans and I only know of two that are even considering voting for Obama this fall. Although it may not be reflected in this forum, U2 has hundreds of thousands of Republican fans in the United States as well as those that are independent of either political party.
Is Christian faith considered more of a general conservative belief or a liberal belief? What about free trade, capitalism, multi-national corporations, big business, military intervention? All things that U2 has either supported or are deeply involved in that are not normally associated with liberal beliefs or ideals.
Is Christian faith considered more of a general conservative belief or a liberal belief?
What an utterly simplistic and misleading statement. There's a big difference between U2 the corporation and the personal beliefs of the members of U2.
Oh and just to clarify, it's neither.
IWhat about free trade, capitalism, multi-national corporations, big business, military intervention? All things that U2 has either supported or are deeply involved in that are not normally associated with liberal beliefs or ideals.
The point is that there are just as many things Republicans can identify with when it comes to the band, as Democrats can.
Even you wouldn't deny the reality that the membership of this forum is overwhelmingly liberal in political leanings.
If you are seriously trying to make the argument that Bono, Edge, Larry and Adam hold a more conservative world view than a liberal one, then I've got nothing else to say to you on this one.
Have you actually read U2 at the End of the World?
Or any of Bono's interviews in the last, oh, say 20 years??
And before you get too much into your victim role as the poor persecuted conservative
Sure have, and there are several qoutes in At the End of the world that completely contradict the notion that U2 are pacifist which some people in here had troubling handling when it was pointed out to them.
The membership in this particular forum is not representitive of all U2 fans in the United States.
Maybe its not an accident that there are only 10 or so people truely on the other side of the political fence in here.
The membership in this particular forum is not representitive of all U2 fans in the United States.
Actually, the law you're citing (18USC789) also applies to the VP, to Presidents-elect and VPs-elect, to "major candidates" for either office, and to immediate family members of all the above. It requires a credible threat of bodily harm, though, which Diemen's example certainly wouldn't constitute, and as far as it goes I very much doubt shouting "Kill him" at a rally would, either.that said whether a head of state democrat or republican, if a threat is made againgst him -it is a federal offense.
i found it humorus how some act like when/if a person is threatening pres. bush with it was big of them to tell them that they wouldn't stand for it, when in fact it's a federal offense.
Very niceWow, I leave for one evening of Cardinology and this thread has taken one of the most cringe worthy turns I've seen in a long while...
The membership in this particular forum is not representitive of all U2 fans in the United States.
I agree, it's an absurd tangent.