Yes or No only: Do U2 have less integrity now than in 1987 (JT era)? - Page 8 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Your Blue Room > Everything You Know Is Wrong > Everything You Know Is Wrong Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-02-2005, 04:08 AM   #141
Acrobat
 
matt76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 475
Local Time: 10:54 PM
No
__________________

matt76 is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 04:20 AM   #142
Forum Moderator
 
ramblin rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 12,865
Local Time: 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by paulrg
No, in fact more.
__________________

__________________
ramblinrose[at]interference.com
ramblin rose is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 04:36 AM   #143
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
beau2ifulday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 5,512
Local Time: 09:54 PM
Yes.
beau2ifulday is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 07:42 AM   #144
New Yorker
 
digsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,853
Local Time: 09:54 PM
yes
digsy is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:38 PM   #145
War Child
 
Shaliz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 666
Local Time: 04:54 PM
no
Shaliz is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 01:47 PM   #146
The Fly
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 183
Local Time: 09:54 PM
No.

A band loses their 'intergrity' as soon as they sign a contract to a higher power. I'm not saying it's a good or bad thing, just a true thing.
TheFly84138 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 02:38 AM   #147
The Fly
 
z00ropean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 40
Local Time: 01:54 PM
Re: Yes or No only: Do U2 have less integrity now than in 1987 (JT era)?

Quote:
Originally posted by jick
Yes or No only: Do U2 have less integrity now than in 1987 (JT era)?

By integrity, I mean everything - not just artistic integrity or personal integrity. The whole broad all-eoncompassing definition of integrity in general.

If the question is too complicated to answer, just don't reply in this post.

No long explanations, just a yes or no. If the question is not clear to you, then just refrain from answering it.

My answer: YES.

Cheers,

J


you're an asshole jick!
z00ropean is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 07:18 AM   #148
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
doctorwho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My TARDIS - currently located in Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 6,367
Local Time: 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by U2girl
If you're asking if U2 is the same band that they were in 1987, no.

They haven't been the same since 1991.
I would contend they haven't been the same band since, oh, 1988. *snicker*

Seriously, the world changes - is it the same world as it was in 1987? Why, I recall seeing videos regularly on MTV back then. I recall radio actually playing a variety of music and taking chances on new artists. I recall singles being a big part of music.

However, while many things are the same, many more stay the same. The 80's also saw Michael Jackson and Madonna do Pepsi commercials (even though Madonna's was later yanked).

It just seems odd that when U2 do a commercial that essentually advertises how consumers can buy their song on a music site - people scream "sell out". Yet, when others let their music appear in car commercials or soda ads, it's more acceptable.

I think Iggy Pop once said that he doesn't care if one of his songs appears in a car commercial now - it wasn't written with that goal in mind. And that's the spirit I see in U2's music. But as U2 have a greater control over their songs than most artists, I'm proud that they haven't just sold their catalog to the highest bidders.

To me, that's integrity - it takes a lot to maintain it in today's world.
__________________
https://u2.interference.com/attachments/forums/signaturepics/sigpic11661_2.gifI always wanted to be somebody, but I should have been more specific.
doctorwho is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 07:49 AM   #149
The Fly
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 197
Local Time: 10:54 PM
Yes
jendzi is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:05 AM   #150
Forum Moderator
 
ramblin rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 12,865
Local Time: 03:54 PM
I want to be sure that people are understanding the question being asked here, as I'm a little surprised by some of the responses:

Question:
Yes or No only: Do U2 have less integrity now than in 1987 (JT era)?

Yes: U2 has less integrity now than in 1987

No: U2 does not have less integrity now than in 1987
__________________
ramblinrose[at]interference.com
ramblin rose is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:53 AM   #151
ONE
love, blood, life
 
MrBrau1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Verplexed in Vermont
Posts: 10,436
Local Time: 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by ramblin rose
I want to be sure that people are understanding the question being asked here, as I'm a little surprised by some of the responses:

Question:
Yes or No only: Do U2 have less integrity now than in 1987 (JT era)?

Yes: U2 has less integrity now than in 1987

No: U2 does not have less integrity now than in 1987
That should have been done on post #1, not page 10.
__________________
"If you needed my autograph, I'd give it to you." Bob Dylan
MrBrau1 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:16 PM   #152
Refugee
 
jick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,054
Local Time: 05:54 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by ramblin rose
I want to be sure that people are understanding the question being asked here, as I'm a little surprised by some of the responses:

Question:
Yes or No only: Do U2 have less integrity now than in 1987 (JT era)?

Yes: U2 has less integrity now than in 1987

No: U2 does not have less integrity now than in 1987
U2 fans are an intelligent bunch and I'm sure can understand the question. The running tally now is 21-17, still in favor of the YES votes.

Cheers,

J
jick is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 04:47 PM   #153
The Original
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
SkeeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,163
Local Time: 04:54 PM
yes
SkeeK is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 11:33 PM   #154
Refugee
 
thrillme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: <---over that'a way
Posts: 1,947
Local Time: 01:54 PM
No.

*another vote for "more so" too*
thrillme is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 11:36 PM   #155
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
RademR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,281
Local Time: 05:54 PM
no
RademR is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 11:58 PM   #156
Acrobat
 
mysticchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: N. Hollywood
Posts: 421
Local Time: 02:54 PM

I hate say this and it hurts to say it, Yes. There is a different energy i feel. JT came out at a perfect time. I feel that for me, it seems that salesl wise, it has gone down. But they are so huge now, it is sick. There was something so special back in the 80's about them. It felt so true to me and completely honest. It was the record that broke them mega rock stars. They have always had a following and it was nice. It just seems that things are different and I know we all have to change. That is part of life. Yes, again I do feel a big change and less integrity but I do stll love them and always will. it also seemed so simple and the concerts were not huge extravagant events.
mysticchild is offline  
Old 02-04-2005, 03:24 AM   #157
Refugee
 
jick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,054
Local Time: 05:54 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by mysticchild
I hate say this and it hurts to say it, Yes. There is a different energy i feel. JT came out at a perfect time. I feel that for me, it seems that salesl wise, it has gone down. But they are so huge now, it is sick. There was something so special back in the 80's about them. It felt so true to me and completely honest. It was the record that broke them mega rock stars. They have always had a following and it was nice. It just seems that things are different and I know we all have to change. That is part of life. Yes, again I do feel a big change and less integrity but I do stll love them and always will. it also seemed so simple and the concerts were not huge extravagant events.
Well put. There surely is a certain shift, but it doesn't really make their music any less enjoyable now.

Cheers,

J
__________________

jick is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×