LCK
Acrobat
jick said:
I disagree. Using your statement, what makes a live song different from the album version is that it isn't note-perfect and this is what you *like*.
I think what makes the live version different is that the band would use a different arrangement, and the song will have a different feel to it. To me, the band should always strive for note perfection, even on the live recordings. And even if they are note perfect and without mistakes, it won't make me like them any less --- maybe you won't like them as much because note-botching seems to be what you like in live recordings.
Cheers,
J
for heaven's sakes jick- all you are doing here is trying to wind people up. Numerous people here have made incredibly good points, which you won't even pause to consider as valid, and numerous other people have asked you direct questions which you fail to address. And now you make the totally illogical ASSumptoin that Joshua tree hugger *wants* botched versions simply because he doesn't obsess over them the way you do. Are you really so bored or attention starved that you continuously, in any thread I've ever seen you in at least, make derogatory remarks about U2. And LivLuv gave you an excellent reason for playing A Sort of Homecoming- as playing Slane WAS a homecoming for them- but you've totally ignored any reasonable answers that come your way, prefering instead to carry on with your own jickicisms.